NTTG
- a critique
(4/3/2004) Opinion:
A driver offers a critique of the
recently formed National Taxi Trades
Group.
The
advent of a new national body for the
taxi trade is an opportunity to look at
their policies and offer a critical
examination; obviously, this critique
evolves from the advert placed in
Taxitalk’s February issue and commonly
known activities within the Northwest.
“The
NWTA was formed in 1994 to fight the
conservative governments proposals to
deregulate the taxi trade nationally”
Not
a good start really, the 1985 Transport
Act enabled local authorities to
effectively de-limit at any time, even
if they consider that their area has no
significant unmet demand. Starting in 1994 is perhaps a tad late, but as the saying
goes “better late than never”.
Obviously,
with such a good and worthy cause, you
should have worked wonders within the
national trade, but I cannot seem to
remember a significant victory by you
off the top of my head.
“We
are an association whose purpose is to
bring together other associations and
related groups to fight under one banner
with the precise purpose of unity in any
fight against any threat to our trade”
Hang
on, you’ve just told us you’ve been
around since 1994, yet I didn’t see
you making any view or taking any action
on either the 1995 DDA or Working Time
Directives. Weren’t these direct
threats to our trade?
You’re a unifying body, so why
are you so interested in unity now? It
wouldn’t be because if you were a mere
member of a national body you wouldn’t
be able to dictate and manipulate your
views as much to people would it?
“The
NTTG does not work in the same way as
other taxi associations or National
Associations”
As
far as I’m aware almost all local
associations use a “one man-one
vote” system, if you mean you’ve
found a new system fairer than that one,
you must really advise someone of these
new democratic principles.
“We
do listen to the views of our members,
because only by debate can one arrive at
the correct course of action”
Hmmmmm,
implying that other associations don’t
listen to members is not going to win
you any friends here! And by debate, I
take it that you mean everyone agreeing
that your right?
“We
collect plate levies to fund the fights
we take on, by doing so spreads the cost
evenly over the trade”
Can’t
really remember a fight so far, but if
you start one, please involve me, I like
a good punch up! But you know if you
hang on a few months I hear the
government are going to issue more
licenses or summat, just think of the
money we could get then!
“When
our trade is not being attacked we go
back to sleepy hollows and continue
earning a living in our businesses
within the trade”
I
don’t know where you’ve been, but
the trade has constantly been attacked
since 1976, perhaps you overslept?
Could
you not be more precise and state, when
“I’m not being attacked on a
local level”, because it would be
more accurate and truthful.
“When I’m not being attacked, I
don’t give a hoot what happens to the
rest of you I’m Okay Jack!” Would
be a far more honest statement.
Your
reference to your willingness to return
to “Sleepy Hollow” is
indicative of the whole problem of the
hackney trade, though you show honesty
by being willing to admit it.
“The
question has been asked why, as separate
entities, we do not belong to a national
association or group. The answer is that
some do, some don’t as is our right”
Quite
right to, it is my right to be critical,
but please remember this before you
email Taxi Driver Online and give them grief for my
right to reply.
In
all seriousness, do you not think that
the £200 per year membership of at
least one national body would have been
at least a commitment to a national
cause, snippets of information that you
could have given freely to other people
to help them would surely have been
appreciated.
Perhaps
it is a good job that some people in
your body had the foresight to join some
national body, otherwise you wouldn’t
have been aware of the first deadline.
“We
have read what other associations have
done since gaining knowledge of the OFT
report, we will not criticise the
efforts they have made”
You
mean like point out that groups will be
formed so that a better response from
the trade will be given? A little bit of
a hypocritical statement don’t you
think?
Especially
in view of the fact that despite all the
effort and money you’ve spent the
transport select committee were that
interested in your view that they
didn’t think you should be a witness
during the hearing of 28th
January 2003.
“On
22nd November one of our
members was informed through his
national association that the ministry
of transport has contacted certain
stakeholders within the trade giving
them 30 days to respond”
As
previously stated, it’s a good job
some of your members had foresight, if
they didn’t you would not have been
aware of the 30 day period. It’s a
real shame that your group isn’t a
stakeholder though, would have been nice
to see you getting grilled by the House
of Commons select committee.
“While
the majority of the trade knew nothing
of this time period”
Again
as previously stated, the position you
would have been in because as is your
right you choose not to join national
bodies.
In
the back window of our members taxis
there is a sticker with the slogan
don’t fix it – its not broken, this
clearly shows all our drivers who are
prepared to stand up and fight for their
livelihoods”
Only
a small point really, but if I was a
card carrying member of a national body
I show commitment or a member of
a local association who didn’t want a
sticker because I show my commitment by
my windscreen sticker, annually, by
being there, when there’s no OFT
report, would you not consider me to be
a person who was not prepared to stand
and fight? Because if you are, I really
take exception to this.
With
all due respect, a bumper sticker saying
those words will achieve two things,
firstly, the public wont understand what
the hell it means and secondly mechanics
across the North West will not repair
taxis.
Other
points
There
are two serious National Bodies in the
country, well two that are treated
seriously by the government, the T&G
and NTA. Both of whom, as stakeholders,
have responded to the OFT report and
indeed met with government on 28th
January 2004 as witnesses. Neither
association went out and took money from
people, neither association has paid
vast amounts of money to assist in their
responses to government, yet as stated
both have been listened to by government
due to their continued commitment to the
taxi trade.
It
is therefore fair to presume that in
spite of collections of many thousands
of pounds, the consideration by the
government of your efforts has been nil.
None
of the MP’s that were contacted have
been able to obtain an input into the
select committee for non stakeholders,
these of course are facts that will not
be welcomed by some nor the fact that
its being highlighted, the tendency to
speak the truth does tend to get people
into trouble.
People
are preaching to the converted when they
call for unity, the T&G and NTA have
made these same calls for years, to
little response. The fact simply is, the
vast majority of the trade isn’t
bothered unless a direct threat is close
by, they don’t deserve the dedicated
few, who work for the trade through
thick and thin.
The
setting up of a new national body tells
people that they don’t trust the
current national bodies. Obviously to
gain a voice in either body you have to
all intents and purposes show a continued
commitment. This could not happen in the
short timescale, so they have set up
their own body to create a voice,
obviously by voice, I mean their voice.
The
fact of the matter is that they are only
interested in their own welfare and not
that of others, this has been proved
when locally they ignored the pleas of
taxi associations in districts adjacent
to their own when they were in trouble.
Eyes being open when it suits to see is
a commonly used phrase that is pretty
useful in this case.
There
was a very relevant point in last months
magazine regarding the OFT and
de-limitation, made by a gentleman who
needs congratulated for both his honesty
and foresight, but will no doubt be
condemned for his opinion.
No
association has won a court case against
de-limitation
of some kind, in despite of local
tradition and any amount of money raised
locally or nationally. Simply
throwing money at the situation does not
work, it merely costs more money and
creates false hope.
Where
our money is precious, the government
print the stuff.
The
Hackney trade are backing a serious
loser if they think that the
shortsighted policies of limitation will
prevail after the OFT report. Those
reading this who will in no doubt
disagree with the points made, however
living in a fantasy land where nothing
matters except what occurs locally has
led to this situation, it has merely
been allowed to fester.
It
is no good blaming either the T&G or
NTA for this, as some will attempt to
do. If anything, these bodies need the
eternal thanks from some of the trade
for keeping the inevitable back for so
long. But will they be thanked? The
answer is of course a emphatic no, if
anything they will be blamed for being
unable to stop the OFT, which is a bit
like blaming that boy with his finger in
the dyke for allowing the torrents of
water to flood by.
You
cannot stop progress, we should all be
aware of this, you can delay it, but
eventually it is impossible to stop.
If
by some miracle the trade manage to get
out of the hole that it’s dug for
itself, there will be two bodies to
thank, namely the T&G and NTA,
however I feel that this is more down to
the OFT incompetence than a robust
attack by the trade. A case of more good
luck than judgement. However, as
you’ve already admitted, by this stage
you will have returned to sleepy hollow
for some more valium, but never mind,
I’m sure that you’ll wake up in time
for the next crisis.
Click
here to read views on this topic or post
your own
|