Dusty Bin wrote:
Yes Mick, but do we need to keep on reminding you that you got a free WAV plate from Gateshead council not that long ago, then you asked them for one of the surrendered saloon plates for free, on a non-transferable basis.
As far as I know Andy would gladly take up the first option, as you did when given the chance.
Dusty

Oh dear me Dusty, another example of selective posting.
I have had a saloon plate (which I bought).
I have had a WAV plate (which I got for free).
The saloon plate I was able to sell (for the same price I bought it for).
The WAV plate was non-transferable.
TOTAL RESULT = NO PROFIT FROM EITHER PLATE.
Now my saloon plate cost me £5,500 and the car cost £5000, total cost for PAYING A PREMIUM FOR A PLATE £10,500.
The so called FREE plate needed to go onto a WAV which cost me £15,000.
DO THE MATHS, A FREE PLATE COST ME £4,500 MORE THAN A SALOON PLATE FOR WHICH I PAID A PREMIUM.
With regard your statement about asking the council for a surrendered/revoked saloon plate on a non-transferable basis, what bull$hit, what I actually enquired about was the reason that plate had NOT been re-issued to the person who was top of the councils waiting list. When I was told there was no longer a waiting list I asked for another to be started in order to re-allocate any plates returned to or revoked by the council and for the re-issuance to be on a non-transferable basis to stop anyone from profiteering from the plate itself, and of course I asked for my name to be included on the list.
You are, both Suspect and yourself Dusty masters of mis-quotation, you both read selectively and then look for ways to re-arrange the words to be-little the original writer.
B. Lucky