Taxi Driver Online
http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Captain Cab a clot?????
http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4633
Page 1 of 4

Author:  skippy41 [ Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Captain Cab a clot?????

In this months taxi today on page 24, one Terence Flanagan branch secretary, :lol: :lol: :lol: :?: :-k is guilty of openly calling our captain a clot and his motley crew, what ever next gbc seen driving a PH on the side :lol:
www.Press Cuttings Monthly.com

Author:  GBC [ Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:25 pm ]
Post subject: 

In the worlds least seen and least read publication?

London has the biggest Taxi trade in Europe, Flannagan uses this paper to attack those a trade has immense jealousy over, ie; the real London Taxi trade, I've never in 21 years seen a hard copy of this paper in London nor has the hundreds of other Cabbies I know, so why does Flannagan get someone to write in it on his behalf? I think we know the answer! :wink:

Well I bet the Captains running for his lawyers now. . . :D

Author:  captain cab [ Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:03 pm ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
Well I bet the Captains running for his lawyers now. . .


I bet he isnt :wink:

I dont need to point out what a fool the GMB guy is, because everytime he writes on here he merely proves the point.

CC

Author:  MR T [ Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:39 pm ]
Post subject: 

Your own words point out what a fool your friend Terry is. He decrys the Queen, Prince Philip and the rest of the Royal Family, and makes a point of their ancestry, is he not a racist by your way of thinking?

He sleeps soundly at night and so does his family, but he uses the term police when referring to the police, the same people who protect his right to voice his opinion
and runs to them immediately he feels threatened.

He takes a sense of enjoyment at the thought of shooting British Army officers in the back, yet he forgets that the same British forces, the boys and girls who place their lives on the line so we can have the right to be free, belong to the same army, and in my opinion, deserve our gratitude and respect.

It should be relatively easy for the representatives of the mini-cab trade in London to implement rules and regulations that they feel are required. After all, the rest of the country, for the last thirty years, has been fighting for clarification regarding the 1976 Misc.Act, so nobody really needs to think too hard, they only have to look back at the work other people have done.

JD has spent a great deal of time researching and co-ordinating many, many cases that are relevant to both the hackney and p.h. trade and for this I commend him. :lol:

It is quite easy to form an opinion of your friend, I know what my opinion is... :mrgreen:

Author:  captain cab [ Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:44 pm ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
Captain Cab a clot?????


Deffo a typo, he put in a LOT instead of UNT :lol:

Quote:
Your own words point out what a fool your friend Terry is. He decrys the Queen, Prince Philip and the rest of the Royal Family, and makes a point of their ancestry, is he not a racist by your way of thinking?

He sleeps soundly at night and so does his family, but he uses the term police when referring to the police, the same people who protect his right to voice his opinion
and runs to them immediately he feels threatened.

He takes a sense of enjoyment at the thought of shooting British Army officers in the back, yet he forgets that the same British forces, the boys and girls who place their lives on the line so we can have the right to be free, belong to the same army, and in my opinion, deserve our gratitude and respect.

It should be relatively easy for the representatives of the mini-cab trade in London to implement rules and regulations that they feel are required. After all, the rest of the country, for the last thirty years, has been fighting for clarification regarding the 1976 Misc.Act, so nobody really needs to think too hard, they only have to look back at the work other people have done.

JD has spent a great deal of time researching and co-ordinating many, many cases that are relevant to both the hackney and p.h. trade and for this I commend him.

It is quite easy to form an opinion of your friend, I know what my opinion is...


jeez thats impressive MrT

CC

Author:  Sussex [ Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:47 pm ]
Post subject: 

Strange that some people can only write more than a few words when it's about someone rather than something. :-k

They can't work out that a) the person dosen't give a stuff, and b) how sad they are. :-s

Author:  MR T [ Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

I totally agree with you Sussex, but he will keep writing his nonsense no matter what you say. :wink:

Author:  Sussex [ Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:56 pm ]
Post subject: 

Image

Author:  captain cab [ Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:00 pm ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
They can't work out that a) the person dosen't give a stuff, and b) how sad they are.


It's especially galling when the person who wrote the initial article has no idea of whom or what he is writing about.

A catholic orangeman ffs

CC

Author:  MR T [ Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:00 pm ]
Post subject: 

Stupid may be , thick definitely, but I think you're going over the top calling him that :wink:

Author:  GBC [ Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:12 am ]
Post subject: 

Sussex wrote:
Image



And you were going to join, you'll never get an application form if you behave like that. [-(







Nope, you'll get the convenors job instead . . . . . . :lol:

Author:  JD [ Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:35 am ]
Post subject: 

MR T wrote:


He sleeps soundly at night and so does his family, but he uses the term police when referring to the police, the same people who protect his right to voice his opinion.


Our common law protects freedom of speech, not as you say, the "police". The police are employed by the state to enforce the law any protection of the law comes from our common law by way of the judiciary and our elected members of parliament who make the law.

JD

Author:  GA [ Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:02 pm ]
Post subject: 

JD wrote:
MR T wrote:


He sleeps soundly at night and so does his family, but he uses the term police when referring to the police, the same people who protect his right to voice his opinion.


Our common law protects freedom of speech, not as you say, the "police". The police are employed by the state to enforce the law any protection of the law comes from our common law by way of the judiciary and our elected members of parliament who make the law.

JD


But the Police protect his rights as they are the enforcers of the Law, the judiciary punish those who try and take that freedom from you and the elected members of parliament agree the acts that form the law.

JD's post shows he will oppose a persons opinion because of the person and not the opinion.

MrT's post observed that the member known as GMB (or as I prefer Wolfie Smith) had made an accusation when he was in fact the greater perpetrator of racism and religious hatred.

All of his post was relevant to the fact that our own Wolfie Smith is indeed "the clot" but as he has a hatred of MrT comparable to JD's, JD decided to further berate MrT and support "the clot" making himself look a "clot". I don't understand why a man of JD's obvious intellect would do such a thing, but it seems he is as committed to a war of words against MrT as Wolfie Smith.

B. Lucky :?

Author:  GBC [ Fri Oct 20, 2006 2:44 pm ]
Post subject: 

[-X

Author:  JD [ Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:46 pm ]
Post subject: 

GA wrote:

But the Police protect his rights as they are the enforcers of the Law, the judiciary punish those who try and take that freedom from you and the elected members of parliament agree the acts that form the law.


I would stick to what you know best before you make yourself out a biggger fool than what you demonstrated here.

JD

Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/