Taxi Driver Online
http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ???????????
http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=21256
Page 1 of 2

Author:  trotskys twin [ Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:58 pm ]
Post subject:  to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ???????????

Weve seen 2 threads locked presumably because that guttersnipe wannabrain has on 2 occassions used the expression n0nce, now i aint bothered about it being directed at me by such as him! And i dont mind slinging about the verbals meself but to see debate stopped by such activity seems to be presenting this cretin with an easy option to stop debate when hes made A COMPLETE MUG OF HIMSELF which hes does regularly . SO WHY ALLOW HIM THIS ESCAPE :?: :?: :?: :?: :?:

if n0nce is being used to insinuate PEDOPHILIA IS IT ACCEPTABLE :?: :?:

IF ITS BEING USED TO SAY YER STUPID BURKE ETC THATS NOT A PROBLEM BUT THE AMBIGUITY IS IN MY OPINION :?:

Author:  grandad [ Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ??????

I watched Only Fools and Horses a couple of days ago. Delboy refered to Grandad and Rodney as n0nces. that was considered to be funny at the time.

Author:  Sussex [ Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ??????

Isn't this why we have the little red exclamation mark?

I find it much better than the 'look at me' type of thread such as this.

Author:  captain cab [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ??????

Sussex wrote:
Isn't this why we have the little red exclamation mark?



cant we just ban only fools and horses?

sorry grandad :lol: :lol: :lol:

Author:  trotskys twin [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ??????

Sussex wrote:
Isn't this why we have the little red exclamation mark?

I find it much better than the 'look at me' type of thread such as this.


COULDNT FIND THE FEKKING THING WHERE THE FEKK IS IT :?:

AND LET'S MAKE IT CLEAR I AM NOT LOOKING FOR ANYONE TO BE BANNED :D

Author:  gusmac [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ??????

Bottom right corner of every post, just above the quote button

Author:  captain cab [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ??????

gusmac wrote:
Bottom right corner of every post, just above the quote button



just reported you Gus.......Alex will be pleased

Author:  gusmac [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ??????

captain cab wrote:
gusmac wrote:
Bottom right corner of every post, just above the quote button



just reported you Gus.......Alex will be pleased


Again? PMSL :lol:

Author:  trotskys twin [ Tue Feb 12, 2013 12:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ??????

gusmac wrote:
Bottom right corner of every post, just above the quote button


you sheep shaging dick head its at the TOP of the page :p :p

Author:  gusmac [ Tue Feb 12, 2013 9:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ??????

trotskys twin wrote:
gusmac wrote:
Bottom right corner of every post, just above the quote button


you sheep shaging dick head its at the TOP of the page :p :p


Get some new glasses 8) ya blind old git. It looks like this Image and it's down thereImage

Author:  Chris the Fish [ Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ??????

Subtle enough?

Author:  captain cab [ Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ??????

Chris the Fish wrote:
Subtle enough?



not really - unless it was a scots nasty arrow :lol: :lol: :lol:

Author:  trotskys twin [ Thu Feb 14, 2013 3:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ??????

me screen must be australian #-o #-o #-o #-o

Author:  Chris the Fish [ Fri Feb 15, 2013 1:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ??????

I just want to say that I very rarely agree with TT's positions, but I do like to see what his position is. Equally I like to read the input from the other side, which can be too extremely to the right for me personally.

I am finding that the deliberate miss-spelling by beginning with a "K" when a "C" is the obvious letter that has been removed by several contributors is becoming tiresome and is lowering the tone of the whole site. I don't even object to the word per se, but use of it to denigrate the "opposition" is turning it all far too personal.

All those that are doing this are actually making themselves look like missbehaving school children and their valid (if extreme) points are being lost.

I suggest that those that simply want to rant at each other use the PM facility (or get a room) and leave the intelligent conversation areas to the grown-ups.

Author:  captain cab [ Fri Feb 15, 2013 1:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: to [edited by admin] or not too [edited by admin] ??????

Chris the Fish wrote:
I just want to say that I very rarely agree with TT's positions, but I do like to see what his position is. Equally I like to read the input from the other side, which can be too extremely to the right for me personally.

I am finding that the deliberate miss-spelling by beginning with a "K" when a "C" is the obvious letter that has been removed by several contributors is becoming tiresome and is lowering the tone of the whole site. I don't even object to the word per se, but use of it to denigrate the "opposition" is turning it all far too personal.

All those that are doing this are actually making themselves look like missbehaving school children and their valid (if extreme) points are being lost.

I suggest that those that simply want to rant at each other use the PM facility (or get a room) and leave the intelligent conversation areas to the grown-ups.



I personally find tt's mis-spellings a lot easier to understand than Charley's correct spellings :wink:

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/