As for the rest of the stuff, there seems little point in addressing things in detail since you're clearly trying to obfuscate

, but one or two further points could well be usefully clarifed.
As regards the Galaxy/Touran and VOSA, yes taxis and PH are different, but the question is why should they be treated differently in different areas?
As regards my analogy with misscarriages of justice, your retort is that the response of the authorities is merely that there's a right to appeal.
On the contrary; for example, the Police and Criminal Evidence Act was enacted to prescribe procedures for the detention and questioning of suspects. The Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act was introduced to ensure that the defence in a criminal case had all the details of the prosecution case available. More recently, the Criminal Cases Review Commission was set up to investigate alleged miscarriages.
Thus I think this underlines the point I'm trying to make - if the law is in need of clarification, is outdated and doesn't really address the needs of those aggrieved then it should be changed - don't you agree? And it's no use merely saying that there's a right to appeal in the process, because this is just avoiding the issue.
And there's no point in saying that things can't be changed because there's no detailed blueprint to hand, because if you can't even see that change is required, what's the point of producing one - that's getting the cart before the horse a bit?