captain cab wrote:
Its the dates that bug me tbh.....as you correctly mentioned, both statements effectively say the same thing - either geniuses think alike or ones read the other - the point is - the point is completely daft - the public aint ever gonna know if the vehicle is safe and the driver has been vetted - whether the vehicle is hailed or on a rank - and that goes for pre-booked PH too - its a stupid f*cking point entirely - and completely irrelevant to the entire debate - as no system can cure it......although it does prove that the google search engine in the LC's offices is working well

After Biggar's statement the LC says:
Unlike the other failures we outlined above, this problem affects both the taxi and private hire markets.Which is why they advocate safety and character tests for both HC
and PH to address the problem. Of course, you're correct to the extent that it can't "cure it" entirely, but clearly no system is perfect and it's better than no safety regulation at all.
As for the American statement, that's more about quality rather than
safety and
criminality.
Thus if Cowboy Joe is at the front of the rank in his dirty teenage Astra then customers have no choice but to take it, normally.
But perhaps where the LC fall down is that some LAs do licence Cowboy Joe in his dirty teenage Astra as HCs.
And the LC say that if Cowboy Joe in his dirty teenage Astra is working in the PH sector then that's fine because if he is then that's because customers demand it. Of course, in reality if you're on holiday and Cowboy Joe turns up in his dirty teenage Astra when you phone for a PHV and you're hoping for something better than that's little better than the HC street hire scenario.