Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat Apr 04, 2026 6:19 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
It would appear that the whole Impact Assessment is now being revised as it is temporarily unavailable on the Law Commission's website, having been replaced by the following wording;

'Following feedback we are revising the draft of the impact assessment, stripping out the data that appears unsatisfactory or not robust, and asking more questions. We welcome further comment on the data and would be grateful for any information'.

Check by clicking onto;

http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/are ... rvices.htm

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
What would YOU think the wording, 'stripping out the data that appears unsatisfactory or not robust' really means.

Answers on a postcard please and in layman's language only!!

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
What would YOU think the wording, 'stripping out the data that appears unsatisfactory or not robust' really means.

Answers on a postcard please and in layman's language only!!


In People Speak it means " It's not what we want to see"..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
Our figures are shecht and were going to make up some more

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
gusmac wrote:
Our figures are shecht and were going to make up some more

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
gusmac wrote:
Our figures are shecht and were going to make up some more



:lol:

true.......so we have a consultation based upon a completely dodgy impact assessment......now is that legal?

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
So does this mean that the revised version is being revised, or what?

The revised version that I linked to the other day is still available on the website:

Dusty Bin wrote:
Sussex wrote:
My betting is they might have by then revised our earnings. :wink:


Well indeed it seems they have issued a revised Impact Assessment document.

The relevant page on the LC's website says:

"Following feedback we produced a revised draft of the impact assessment stripping out the data which appears unsatisfactory or not robust and to ask further questions. We welcome further comment on the data and would be grateful for further information."

http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/con ... s/1804.htm

The Impact Assessment itself is at:

http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/doc ... ssment.pdf

It seems that for industry revenue they've used the updated version of the figure that the OFT used around a decade ago. Thus it's Office of National Statistics figures for consumer spending, and this excludes fare revenue from business and tourists.

So the updated figure is £2.585 billion, as compared to £1.4 billion previously.

Of course, while previously this was referred to as 'industry revenue' it's now described as 'spent by UK households on taxis', to reflect the fact that it doesn't include all the trade's income.

The 'industry employment' figure has been increased from 37,311 (the IBIS figure) to 250,000, and a footnote to the latter says that "Industry evidence suggests this to be a reasonable estimate of those actively engaged".

So since there are around 300,000 badges in issue they're essentially saying that one sixth of them belong to inactive badge holders.

Which seems to overestimate the number of inactive drivers in my opinion, but certainly more realistic than the previous figure.

Of course, this will impact on the other figures that they've computed using the revised stats, and the brief statement on the website seems to suggest that they've made other changes, but quite what they might be I'm not too sure at this stage.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57242
Location: 1066 Country
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
What would YOU think the wording, 'stripping out the data that appears unsatisfactory or not robust' really means.

Answers on a postcard please and in layman's language only!!

Getting rid of the dodgy stats.

Which is why we have the month extension.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Sussex wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
What would YOU think the wording, 'stripping out the data that appears unsatisfactory or not robust' really means.

Answers on a postcard please and in layman's language only!!

Getting rid of the dodgy stats.

Which is why we have the month extension.


According to the Mr RP at the LC the reason we have an extension is because so many people asked for it :?

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
toots wrote:

According to the Mr RP at the LC the reason we have an extension is because so many people asked for it :?


Since when did you expect them to say.....'we f*cked up ?'

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
captain cab wrote:
toots wrote:

According to the Mr RP at the LC the reason we have an extension is because so many people asked for it :?


Since when did you expect them to say.....'we f*cked up ?'


Not any time soon :wink:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 710 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group