Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat Apr 04, 2026 12:36 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 05, 2026 1:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18359
Nothing particularly groundbreaking here, but an interesting section about prosecutions, which of course is relevant to recent discussions on here :-o


Councillors back stronger taxi licensing rules to improve passenger safety in Milton Keynes

https://www.miltonkeynes.co.uk/news/peo ... es-5621083

City Liberal Democrats are backing new laws to improve taxi safety for passengers in MK.

They have welcomed a new Government consultation on reforming taxi and private hire vehicle licensing, calling it an important step towards improving passenger safety and tackling the long-standing issue of out of area working.

The consultation, which closes on 1 April, is exploring changes to national legislation to address the problem of drivers being licensed by one local authority but operating in another.

In Milton Keynes, around 1,500 drivers are licensed by the City Council. However, once licensed, drivers can operate anywhere in England as long as they’re registered with an operator.

This means a significant number of taxis working in Milton Keynes are licensed by other authorities, often in areas with different licensing standards and enforcement practices.

In addition, drivers licensed outside of Milton Keynes don’t have to pass the local knowledge test, that drivers licensed by the City Council must do.

Lib Dem councillors say this creates inconsistent standards and makes local enforcement more difficult.

Last year, twelve drivers were prosecuted by Milton Keynes City Council. Of those, only two were licensed locally, while the remaining ten were licensed by other authorities including Buckinghamshire, Transport for London, West Northamptonshire and Cambridge.

For residents, the Lib Dems say reform would mean:

Greater confidence that taxis are properly inspected and roadworthy

    • Consistent safeguarding standards across all drivers

    • Stronger action against poor practice

    • Fairer rules for drivers who already meet high local standards

    • A safer night-time economy

Reforming taxi licensing is a key commitment in Milton Keynes Liberal Democrat’s local election manifesto this year. The group have pledged to work with Government to change the law so Milton Keynes City Council can properly regulate taxis operating in the city, including addressing out of area working.

Councillor Paul Trendall, Vice Chair of Milton Keynes City Council’s Licensing Committee, said: “We have been calling for reform in the sector for years, because without changes to law, local councils’ hands are tied. Residents expect taxis operating in Milton Keynes to meet our standards. At the moment that isn’t always the case. Some vehicles working in our city are licensed elsewhere, often where it is cheaper and monitoring may be less. This makes it harder for our Council to enforce consistent safety and vehicle standards.”

Campbell Park & Old Woughton Councillor Graham Eaton, added: “For many women, older residents and people with mobility difficulties, taxis are not a luxury –they’re essential. Whether it’s getting home safely at night, attending hospital appointments, or travelling where buses don’t run, residents deserve to feel safe and confident. We will work with the Government to ensure Milton Keynes has the powers it needs.”

The Liberal Democrats are encouraging residents, safety groups and drivers to take part in the consultation and help to shape stronger rules.

Almost two years ago, the Lib Dems invited local taxi drivers to become White Ribbon Ambassadors following reports from women across the city about inappropriate behaviour. As a result, additional safeguarding was introduced to ensure all licence holders understand that verbal, physical and emotional abuse will not be tolerated. Mandatory safeguarding training has since been strengthened to included domestic abuse and equality awareness.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 05, 2026 1:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18359
The MK response to the FOI discussed last week actually suggests 18 prosecutions in 2025, and that's just for the first six months of the year.

But most of the details are redacted (most obviously the licensing authority of the 'offender' in question), and there's lots marked TBC/'under investigation' and the like, so presumably at the stage of the FOI just a few months after the end of the relevant period, a lot of those were still up in the air, and many won't have actually proceeded to prosecution.

The 2024 list is a bit more complete, but again many are marked 'first [court] hearing scheduled' or 'awaiting trial', or similar.

But the 'offenders' licensing authority are clearly marked, and of the ten in 2024, three are local cars, one is Cambridge City Council, while five of the others are Buckinghamshire Council drivers. While the tenth doesn't have a licensing authority, because it was an unlicensed driver :-o

But which all makes me wonder, will a council like MK be more inclined to prosecute cross-border drivers for an offence they might deal with differently regarding a local driver? Not, perhaps, because of double standards or favouritism, or whatever, but because they might think that otherwise a cross-border driver would get off scot-free by the relevant licensing authority?

Anyway, a quick butcher's at the MK spreadsheet underlines how difficult it would be to draw compelling comparisons between authorities. And I wouldn't want to be the one analysing MK's full enforcement log, or whatever :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 05, 2026 1:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18359
Not sure if this link to the MK spreadsheet will work, but if not the second (indirect) link below should be OK, and the file is available via a spreadsheet attachment (.xlsx) about halfway down the page. And, unlike some of the other responses I've looked at, the staff at MK council have obviously spent a *lot* of time compiling this :-o

(Note there are two different tabs on the spreadsheet, namely one for 2024 and one for 2025.)

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ ... sthrough=1

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ ... utions_177


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 05, 2026 7:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20806
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
I would say par for the course as the sort of drivers most willing to take a risk are also the ones who will go to the most effort to save money

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 960 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group