Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 5:27 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: fit cctv in phv
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
GMB Branch secretary wrote:
In the recent past met with PCO reached heads of agreement on CCTV quite simple Props orgs unsuccesfull for years.
LTDA of course oppose any form of advertising on PHV in the interest of piblic safety of course.So at the moment ads wont pay for CCTV howeversoon coming limited ads for companies vehicles,ie Ace motors 12846509 When that arrives GMB says restriction of trade does deal with multi national too livery entire vehicle,thereby eliminating company and earn the vehicle owner more than enough too pay for CCTV snd in vehicle protection [shields],Yes I know were useless.


Aye, thats one of your best entries yet Terry. :wink:

Do you drink?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Quote:
Is Gaelic your first language?


classic :lol:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
Firstly there are strict conditions under which cctv evidence can be accepted in court in general terms it means that you musn't be able to view the images yourself but only a police officer can as part of an investigation and if they decline to investigate the crime e.g. a runner or minor criminal damage to the vehicle you cannot use the image as part of a private prosecution or so i was told when i looked into it

secondly the quality of the images may not be good enough to be acceptable as evidence anyway

I think they have improved a fair bit over the last few years.

As for the tapes not being used as evidence, I'm too not sure about that. Pretty sure tapes are used by the 1000s in court. Can't see why ours would be different.

Spoke to a chap recently who's ex-boss got attacked this year. The CCTV was vital in getting a conviction, and I think the scum that attacked him was sent away for a very long time.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 974
Location: london
I agrre with cameras in cars.
As for GMB, I am glad you don't represent me, you can't string two words together correctly!.

_________________
stressed controller!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
I put CCTV in all my cab's three or four years ago, they have been worth their weight in gold ,better still is when you have a monitor that the passengers can see themselves in, if it is any use to anyone a few of the drivers have made up their own systems, they simply used a power converter that plugs into the cigarette lighter and a cheap household video-recorder with the mike and camera, I am sure they said it only cost them between 100-£150 :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
Sussex wrote:

As for the tapes not being used as evidence, I'm too not sure about that. Pretty sure tapes are used by the 1000s in court. Can't see why ours would be different.



I believe that a sign must be clearly visible advising people that a CCTV system which records is fitted inside the vehicle.

I also think that as much could be achieved by having the stickers on the cars anyway.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
GA wrote:
Sussex wrote:

As for the tapes not being used as evidence, I'm too not sure about that. Pretty sure tapes are used by the 1000s in court. Can't see why ours would be different.



I believe that a sign must be clearly visible advising people that a CCTV system which records is fitted inside the vehicle.

I also think that as much could be achieved by having the stickers on the cars anyway.

B. Lucky :D

GA. cameras are much better than stickers when someone drives into your vehicle and claims it's your fault


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20858
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
I have heard of cases where cctv evidence is challenged in court if it has been pre viewed by anyone other than the officer conducting the investigation i'm not saying that that would always be the case but was told by one company selling in car cctv installations that the recordings should not be viewable by anyone other than the police as this is a loophole to have evidence thrown out of court ALLEGEDLY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
edders23 wrote:
I have heard of cases where cctv evidence is challenged in court if it has been pre viewed by anyone other than the officer conducting the investigation i'm not saying that that would always be the case but was told by one company selling in car cctv installations that the recordings should not be viewable by anyone other than the police as this is a loophole to have evidence thrown out of court ALLEGEDLY


I think thats exacty right.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 5:37 pm
Posts: 809
Location: Cheshire
Ive got it fitted, did it myself the cheapo way but it works perfect.
The police used it once to do a woman who had an accident in front of me.

I checked it out and as long as a sign is displayed in the vehicle warning that cctv is operating it's ok.
Everythings challenged in court these days. It's ok in shops etc to have it and it's used succesfully in court.

I must admit it's more of a deterrent, as soon as punters see the sign any sign of larking about of thoughts of running goes out of the window.

I did it for about £160. Lads at work have the hard disc type fitted and it's no better than mine but costs £600+


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: cctv
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 4:10 pm
Posts: 78
Location: costa clyde
I just have the sticker over my glove compartment it reads cctv recording 24hours in this vehicle. It is the talking point when they come in to the vehicle so if it acts as a detterent thats good. But glasgow city council should help towards the cost of cctv in our vehicles by allowing us to put adverts on our phv. Afterall they rip us of for thousand,s of pounds over the years :evil: :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 4:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
I've resurrected this thread because I feel the issue of driver safety is paramount.

I can go back many years and highlight countless fatal incidents that have taken place throughout the country. Sadly, many of these authorities where these incidents have taken place, have still done nothing to assist the plight of drivers faced with immediate danger.

This state of affairs is now untenable and its high time it was remedied. The solution as per usual is going to have to come through the persistent lobbying of MP's and ministers who have responsibility in ensuring the safety of Taxi drivers.

Local councils have had more than enough time to implement the safety measures we ask for but sadly the majority have been found wanting.

If anyone wants to bring the issue to the attention of the DfT and their local MP you can write to them at the following links.

Find your MP by postcode or name.

http://www.upmystreet.com/commons/l/

Alphabetical list of MP's

http://www.parliament.uk/directories/hciolists/alms.cfm

House of Lords Members

http://www.parliament.uk/directories/ho ... embers.cfm

David Alton is one of the few Lords with an email address. Perhaps David could assist us in highlighting the security problems associated with driving a Taxi and the abysmal record of local authorities in allowing security cameras in Taxis?

David can be contacted at altond@parliament.uk his website is at http://www.davidalton.com/ and his blog is at
http://www.dodonline.co.uk/engine.asp?l ... y&id=26959

DfT Junior Minister Gillian Merron can be contacted here merrong@parliament.uk and her website is here
http://www.gillianmerron.labour.co.uk/V ... ?Page=6034

David Farmer head of Taxi Division at the DfT can be contacted here. David.Farmer@dft.gsi.gov.uk

It is worth reminding everyone that contrary what Captain Cab may think the DfT are in favour of any security measure that protects All Taxi Drivers. Here is what they said in their best practice document.

The owners and drivers of vehicles will often want to install security measures to protect the driver. Local licensing authorities may not want to insist on such measures, on the grounds that they are best left to the judgement of the owners and drivers themselves. But it is good practice for licensing authorities to look sympathetically on - or actively to encourage - their installation. They could include a screen between driver and passengers, or CCTV. Licensing authorities may want to encourage the taxi and PHV trades to build good links with the local police force, including participation in any Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships.

The DfT are asking local councils to be sympathetic in granting security measures but as we all know many councils have a politically correct agenda, even when it comes to Taxi driver safety. Therefore, it is up to ourselves to lobby on behalf of our own safety because it is patently obvious that no one else is going to do it for us.

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 4:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 974
Location: london
Maybe the only answer is the TX/fiat where the passengers sit behind you.

_________________
stressed controller!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Perhaps the answer is JD why a driver has to apply at all for CCTV?

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
captain cab wrote:
Perhaps the answer is JD why a driver has to apply at all for CCTV?

CC


I agree and I've often thought a refusal of this kind could be met with a successful legal challenge. However the outcome is not certain but if cases can be won on conditions attached to vehicle colour then there is no reason why they can't be won on the grounds of driver safety.

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 644 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group