Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 9:13 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
LongshanksED wrote:
Why? It's to me that Caledonian and Jasbar are the same person!

Same views, same style of writing, same style of posting in threads and quoting in threads.

Be surprised if they are 2 different people


Nidge wrote:
Clicked on days ago.


LongshanksED wrote:
Twigged the first post Caledonian made after Taylor was "taking a break"

Who's hiding under pseudaniums and false names now Jim?


Frank Lay wrote:
Be fair, The only way they will find someone to agree with them in to make someone up.

Sad but predictable.


In other words, I was right about the Best Practice Guidance, and you guys haven't got a clue :D

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
LongshanksED wrote:
Why? It's to me that Caledonian and Jasbar are the same person!

Same views, same style of writing, same style of posting in threads and quoting in threads.

Be surprised if they are 2 different people


Nidge wrote:
Clicked on days ago.


LongshanksED wrote:
Twigged the first post Caledonian made after Taylor was "taking a break"

Who's hiding under pseudaniums and false names now Jim?


Frank Lay wrote:
Be fair, The only way they will find someone to agree with them in to make someone up.

Sad but predictable.


In other words, I was right about the Best Practice Guidance, and you guys haven't got a clue :D


Where in any of those treads does it say that, apart from you?

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
toots wrote:
Where in any of those treads does it say that, apart from you?


Not quite sure if I'm reading you right, Toots, but my point was that the fact that these guys ignore the issues under discussion and instead post their misguided conspiracy theories seems to suggest they've got nothing to say about the BPG.

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
toots wrote:
Where in any of those treads does it say that, apart from you?


Not quite sure if I'm reading you right, Toots, but my point was that the fact that these guys ignore the issues under discussion and instead post their misguided conspiracy theories seems to suggest they've got nothing to say about the BPG.


Just cos they haven't got anything to say about it doesn't make you right :roll: It could possibly be that they are truly bored of reiterating the same stuff over and over again. It's like being on the Buddhist wheel of life, ffs

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
toots wrote:

Just cos they haven't got anything to say about it doesn't make you right :roll: It could possibly be that they are truly bored of reiterating the same stuff over and over again. It's like being on the Buddhist wheel of life, ffs


They want selective best practice......just like LA's ffs

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
toots wrote:

Just cos they haven't got anything to say about it doesn't make you right :roll: It could possibly be that they are truly bored of reiterating the same stuff over and over again. It's like being on the Buddhist wheel of life, ffs


Swanee made a point, I answered it the best I could, then we get the silly conspiracy theories starting, so I made a slightly sarcastic response, but essentially the point was that they ignored the central issue and started bitching, as you are now.

You say it's boring, but that didn't stop you in the other thread, which I flagged up, so I can't see your problem. :roll:

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
toots wrote:
ffs


captain cab wrote:
ffs


Sums your input up nicely :wink:

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
toots wrote:
ffs


captain cab wrote:
ffs


Sums your input up nicely :wink:


Yeah, I tend to agree, the Scotch section has that type of affect.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:04 am
Posts: 507
Aw jimmy,

Yawn Yawn Yawn.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:25 am
Posts: 190
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
swannee wrote:
Have you actually read the best practice guide?

We're not actually expected to read it, surely :lol:
Quote:
Sections 43 to 49 and annexe A refer specifically to numeric controls, as opposed to the sections you quote which refer to other requirements or conditions which may unnecessarily limit the type of vehicle which can be licensed or indeed make it too expensive to operate a taxi in an area with little trade.


The paragraphs referred to earlier are headed:

THE ROLE OF LICENSING: POLICY JUSTIFICATION

Thus that refers to the whole range of what the council does licensing wise, and therefore could refer to vehicle and driver conditions, numerical controls etc.

Each of the prominent policy areas also has its own section, which you refer to above in relation to numerical controls.

Thus you're comparing the general to the particular. The general refers to the justification of all policies, whereas the particular provides information relevant to particular areas.

Quote:
Perhaps Caledonian Cabbie could have a meet with jasbar and skull to refine the argument and base it on FACTS


I think it's TPTB that should get their house in order.


If you have never read the BPG then you are being stupid trying to quote from it.

I am not confusing the general with the particular, rather you are trying to use a few paragraphs which outline the aims of the whole BPG to argue against the specifics of quantity regulation.

You also omit to mention that it is made abundantly clear that the Scottish Government takes no side on quantity regulation neither does it make any recommendation.. The guide is crystal clear that local authorities are best placed to decide on this issue and merely suggests points to consider before reaching a decision.

Your poorly researched argument is similar to the Jasbar modus operandi of frequent misquotes from documents, comments taken out of context and conclusions reached without valid or logical reasoning.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 6:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
swannee wrote:
If you have never read the BPG then you are being stupid trying to quote from it.


It was a joke, hence the smilie. :roll:

Quote:
I am not confusing the general with the particular, rather you are trying to use a few paragraphs which outline the aims of the whole BPG to argue against the specifics of quantity regulation.


And why not? It was you who was trying to say that the general points were irrelevant, but my point is that the general and particular points should be considered and the document read as a whole.

Which accords with common sense, surely?

Quote:
You also omit to mention that it is made abundantly clear that the Scottish Government takes no side on quantity regulation neither does it make any recommendation.. The guide is crystal clear that local authorities are best placed to decide on this issue and merely suggests points to consider before reaching a decision.


Isn't that just stating the obvious?

The clue is in the words "best", "practice" and "guidance".

I haven't claimed it was set in legal stone, and transgressions punishable by hanging.

Quote:
Your poorly researched argument is similar to the Jasbar modus operandi of frequent misquotes from documents, comments taken out of context and conclusions reached without valid or logical reasoning.


For example?

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 523 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group