Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat Apr 04, 2026 5:50 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57242
Location: 1066 Country
Anonymous wrote:
So SM can get himself a plate, but he could have to spend £35k+ to get a vehicle to put it on. Then he would have to pay higher insurance and higher running costs. I believe that the cost to enter the trade would be beyond the average driver, similar to the way the premium restricts now. This will no doubt lead to more people with money to invest buying vehicles and putting them out to rent, I didn't realise that "leech" was a term of affection on the south coast.

But that's what happens in many big cities now, and only a few drivers in those cities appear to object.

It all goes back to the standards issue. A limit, albeit an un-official one, can be maintained by having tight standards.

Alas in your manor weak, in-effective enforcement has led to sheds being licensed.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 12:54 am 
Sussex wrote:
Alas in your manor weak, in-effective enforcement has led to sheds being licensed.


And that is exactly why change to policy will "appear" to be drastic, when in fact the council should have implimented then enforced quality standards instead of quantity.

The thing is though that you have consistantly banged on about drivers choice, implimenting a WAV only HC fleet limits the choice of the driver, so you should see why I consider your recent posts as contradictionary.

It has also been suggested that MPV WAVs be considered as an alternative however if you are refering to the VW Sharan or any other similar type where wheelchairs are loaded through the rear door, I would question their safety for the passenger should the vehicle be involved in a rear end collision.

Preferably only vehicles with European Full Body M1 specification should be considered, however I would concede the use of any professionally converted vehicle of a similar standard providing it allowed an alternative exit route following a collision.

It is strange here in Gateshead at the moment, we are probably the first to attempt to change policy following all the investigations and government reccomendations, Brighton & Hove have been singled out as the correct way to form taxi policy and I believe that every council should use it as a model on which to form their own policy.

B. Lucky


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 7:16 am 
Anonymous wrote:
Brighton & Hove have been singled out as the correct way to form taxi policy and I believe that every council should use it as a model on which to form their own policy.

How strange then it is that the T&GWU fought so hard aginst thisd proposal.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 11:57 am 
Cgull wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Brighton & Hove have been singled out as the correct way to form taxi policy and I believe that every council should use it as a model on which to form their own policy.

How strange then it is that the T&GWU fought so hard aginst thisd proposal.


Two points Cgull,

Firstly B&H have a policy of restricting numbers and managed growth, is this not what the T&G have consistantly called for.

Secondly, why do people constantly percieve all of my posts to be from the T&G. I, believe it or not, DO NOT WORK FOR THE TGWU therefore when I write and I believe that every council should use it as a model on which to form their own policy. I refer to my own opinion.

B. Lucky


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57242
Location: 1066 Country
Anonymous wrote:
Two points Cgull,

Firstly B&H have a policy of restricting numbers and managed growth, is this not what the T&G have consistantly called for.

Since when? :shock:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 5:25 pm 
So restricting numbers primarily and allowing a set number of new licenses on a yearly basis is not managing growth, particularly when the new licenses, all 5 of them, are specifically for WAVs.

Or does your quote question the T&G's calls for managed growth.


B. Lucky


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1085 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group