Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 3:17 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 4:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Quote:
toots wrote:
MR T wrote:
toots wrote:
gusmac wrote:
toots wrote:

I always thought it was a required trait of the job to be slightly if not fully insane :lol:


Not essential, but very helpful :lol:


It helps me do it, but, I'm only slightly insane :lol:


Do what..?


IT :lol:

Wtf do you think :wink:


Page 59 :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Quote:
Page 59 :shock:


Skippy I'm well past page 59 :D but this is a serious post so stop fooling around :wink:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Quote:
Wheelchair Charlie (David): we’re currently doing a disability survey. Everywhere I go I target taxi drivers. Not one taxi driver has anything good to say about the Govt or local authorities. Now they’re going to hit back. Every single local authority is committing discrimination against the disabled. Under the DDA all taxi ranks should be disabled accessible: ie. safe to load and unload wheelchair passengers. Councils are breaching the DDA because they’re not doing this. They’re doing it for bus stops, but not taxi ranks.

I’m partially sighted: in our travels I have discovered that tariff cards, driver badges etc should be tactile so passengers should be able to read them. This does not exist anywhere. This is a failure of licensing departments to do this for you. They are using disability law to punish the taxi trade. Picking and choosing – you can hit them back twice as hard as they are hitting you. It adds up to some £9,000 worth discrimination per taxi. If you want info I can supply it. mailto:wheelchaircharlie39@uwclub.net
There was a number of interesting statements made at this meeting, one such statement made by wheelchair charlie was that........ all Councillors by law should be made aware of this consultation document, and not just the local licensing officer.... it should be a full council reply... it might well be advisable to e-mail your local councillors and enclosing the consultation document and asking them for their opinion... also asking them whether or not your council will be able to reply In the time period permitted....

There is also the statement in Quote which is very interesting and could be extremely expensive... if true.. wheelchaircharlie39@uwclub.net

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
This whole exercise from start to finish has been farcical and mismanaged.

What should have been a straightforward exercise, has turned out to be an inept comedy of errors driven by political correctness and bias in favour of anyone and everyone except to those people who are required to bankroll these conditions, namely the taxi owner.

It would appear to me and probably everyone else in the cab trade that there has been a distinct lack of exclusive consultation between DfT officials and representatives of the taxi trade, or if indeed there has been such consultation then those that were consulted have failed to inform their own members and those people who work in the taxi trade as a whole of the detailed discussions that took place.

This issue has been ongoing on for some considerable time yet only recently has the collective taxi trade been given the opportunity to digest the proposals put forward by the DfT. These proposals should now be the first stage of a wider more exhaustive consultation with those who have to bear the cost. The disabled lobby were given ample time to add their input, it is now time for the taxi trade to be given the same opportunity to add theirs.

The meeting of minds group would probably be the best vehicle to act as the collective body for the taxi trade in this matter, providing they can get their act together and sing from the same hymn book?

There is however an element in this group namely NALEO that has demonstrated in the past that it sometimes has a conflicting agenda to that of the taxi trade. Taxi trade members in this group obviously outnumber those of NALEO therefore it is up to those people to lead the debate in the direction of the interests of the taxi trade while at the same time bringing on board NALEO members. If that cannot be achieved then a separate group within the meetings of minds should be set up to specifically carry forward the opinions and views of the taxi trade. NALEO has the option of registering an abstention or dissension from any proposals and future discussions relating to this particular issue.

There are other options that could be considered but the overall priority is a “coherent single united voice.”

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
JD wrote:
This whole exercise from start to finish has been farcical and mismanaged.

What should have been a straightforward exercise, has turned out to be an inept comedy of errors driven by political correctness and bias in favour of anyone and everyone except to those people who are required to bankroll these conditions, namely the taxi owner.

It would appear to me and probably everyone else in the cab trade that there has been a distinct lack of exclusive consultation between DfT officials and representatives of the taxi trade, or if indeed there has been such consultation then those that were consulted have failed to inform their own members and those people who work in the taxi trade as a whole of the detailed discussions that took place.

This issue has been ongoing on for some considerable time yet only recently has the collective taxi trade been the opportunity to digest the proposals put forward by the DfT. These proposals should now be the first stage of a wider more exhaustive consultation with those who have to bear the cost. The disabled lobby were given ample time to add their input, it is now time for the taxi trade to be given the same opportunity to add theirs.

The meeting of minds group would probably be the best vehicle to act as the collective body for the taxi trade in this matter, providing they can get their act together and sing from the same hymn book?

There is however an element in this group namely NALEO that has demonstrated in the past that it sometimes has a conflicting agenda to that of the taxi trade. Taxi trade members in this group obviously outnumber those of NALEO therefore it is up to those people to lead the debate in the direction of the interests of the taxi trade while at the same time bringing on board NALEO members. If that cannot be achieved then a separate group within the meetings of minds should be set up to specifically carry forward the opinions and views of the taxi trade. NALEO has the option of registering an abstention or dissension from any proposals and future discussions relating to this particular issue.

There are other options that could be considered but the overall priority is a “coherent single united voice.”

Regards

JD


Image

=D>

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 9:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 2596
Location: Hampshire (HC)
JD, maybe a rewording of that and submit it to the DfT?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
cabbyman wrote:
JD, maybe a rewording of that and submit it to the DfT?


Do you have any specific word in mind or all of them :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
Won't matter a stuff whatever happens in Edinburgh as the TramJam will have you all gridlocked until at least 2037... :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
http://www.fastblacks.com/newforum/inde ... 311.0.html

It seems that certain people in theTaxi Trade in Edinburgh do not realise that they will be affected to..... considering the Scottish Nat fed were involved at the beginning re DDA Act I find it surprising..... especially as the consultation paper states it is for England, Wales, and Scotland.....

The DfT “road show” meetings consist of three: London, Bristol and Edinburgh. ..... :idea: :idea: :idea: :idea: #-o #-o

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
MR T wrote:
The DfT “road show” meetings consist of three: London, Bristol and Edinburgh. ..... :idea: :idea: :idea: :idea: #-o #-o

The cab trade in Edinburgh are concerned about one issie, and one issue only. And that ain't the DDA.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 7:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
cabbyman wrote:
JD, maybe a rewording of that and submit it to the DfT?


My post is ok for brief criticism on a taxi forum but totally inadequet for anything else.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Paul Lawry will be unable to come to Liverpool on 25th. :shock: :shock:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
MR T wrote:
Paul Lawry will be unable to come to Liverpool on 25th. :shock: :shock:


Do they still do lynchings in Scouseland? :lol:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
MR T wrote:
Paul Lawry will be unable to come to Liverpool on 25th. :shock: :shock:

Gone up in my estimation. :roll:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
MR T wrote:
Paul Lawry will be unable to come to Liverpool on 25th. :shock: :shock:


It's you bloody scousers you'd scare anybody :lol:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 759 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group