Taxi Driver Online
http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Kicked Out Again
http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11141
Page 1 of 5

Author:  chipper [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Kicked Out Again

just had a wee phone call saying no de-reg and 1 application refused.

The Forum should be buzzing the night :wink: :wink: :wink:

Author:  LongshanksED [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:06 pm ]
Post subject: 

no doubt its all part of the masterplan

each time it gets kicked out its always a plan in their scheme


surely now its time to end this boys

Author:  captain cab [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:08 pm ]
Post subject: 

LongshanksED wrote:
no doubt its all part of the masterplan

each time it gets kicked out its always a plan in their scheme


surely now its time to end this boys


Never underestimate a complete idiot.

CC

Author:  grandad [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:53 pm ]
Post subject: 

We are in it for the long haul. The game is not won in the first 5 minutes. This was not unexpected but all part of the process.
There are a whole manner of cliche's that can be dragged up.

Author:  ALI T [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 4:49 pm ]
Post subject: 

heres the links to

http://cpol.edinburgh.gov.uk/getdoc_ext ... cId=124708

http://cpol.edinburgh.gov.uk/getdoc_ext ... cId=124642

http://cpol.edinburgh.gov.uk/getdoc_ext ... cId=124710

ffs are these muppets being taking for a a ride by mr mcentegart,or what?
did this guy explain anything to them ??????
fools and thier money eh
and fools and other peoples money .......even worse.

Author:  ALI T [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:15 pm ]
Post subject: 

chipper ive been looking back and doing some unrelated research i came across some posts by you not so long ago.

its ok to change youre opinion.i have no problem with that.

btw have you just bought in or summit. :lol: :lol:

http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtop ... 33&start=0


you and tc best o pals now :lol: :lol: :lol:

Author:  ALI T [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:17 pm ]
Post subject: 

just realised thats all old news
ffs am well oot o touch :lol: :lol: :lol:

Author:  Jasbar [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:41 pm ]
Post subject: 

Now, let me see.

A demand is identified. The only reason a licence can be refused if there is no significant demand.

Methinks Cllr Keir has just broken the Law. I wonder whether a flagrant breach of the Law is a criminal offence. Certainly worth a look.

Cllr Keir is certainly corrupt. Whatever game he isplaying it doesn't involve political truth, honesty or any semblance of the alleged democratic political accountability we're supposed to enjoy.

Now we wait for two things. First the appeal. It was always going to go to appeal. The sooner the better.

And second? The second gentlemen is the next assault, rape or even murder. The sword of Damocles is hanging over Keir's head. It's only a matter of time.

Meanwhile, there is a stirring in the political process .....




:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Author:  captain cab [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:45 pm ]
Post subject: 

Jasbar wrote:

Cllr Keir is certainly corrupt.



ffs.....you then wonder why these people wont communicate with you?

CC

Author:  chipper [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:55 pm ]
Post subject: 

ALI T wrote:
chipper ive been looking back and doing some unrelated research i came across some posts by you not so long ago.

its ok to change youre opinion.i have no problem with that.

btw have you just bought in or summit. :lol: :lol:

http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtop ... 33&start=0


you and tc best o pals now :lol: :lol: :lol:


yes changed my view in some ways and no i have not bought in and i have no intention of either.
my view is i just dont see why more plates should be put on the work is not out there right now and this would kill the trade forget the vested intrests stuff iam talking about the normal bloke who jockys his earnings would go down the pan

oh and another thing that helped was the constant insult and P1ss that jim posts that man is off his rocker big time.
i have no problems with others views as you dont with mine but i just cant stand the playground bully boy stuff.

i bet the insults will start soon

Author:  chipper [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:58 pm ]
Post subject: 

captain cab wrote:
Jasbar wrote:

Cllr Keir is certainly corrupt.



ffs.....you then wonder why these people wont communicate with you?

CC


makes you wonder why we do either or could it be that we are still waiting for the master plan to kick in :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Author:  ALI T [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 6:02 pm ]
Post subject: 

captain cab wrote:
Jasbar wrote:

Cllr Keir is certainly corrupt.



ffs.....you then wonder why these people wont communicate with you?

CC

why whats wrong with honesty
these people should communicate no matter what is said,thier elected representatives after all.
you may prefer to suck up to these people i certainly wouldnt.and mr taylor must feel the same.
these people are an affront to decency imo.
as are most of the so called establishment from top to bottom.
dont you watch the news.
thier all the same.
from bankers to politicions
if they were on fire id make sure i took a pash doon wind.

Author:  chipper [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 6:04 pm ]
Post subject: 

just a wee thought were you boys playing a april fools joke or what :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Author:  chipper [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 6:09 pm ]
Post subject: 

ALI T wrote:
why whats wrong with honesty
these people should communicate no matter what is said,thier elected representatives after all.


1. he has no proof that anyone is corrupt if he does post it here now or even inform the police.

2.sorry ali but no you can not insult people and expect them to communicate with you come on man get a grip.

Author:  gusmac [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 6:14 pm ]
Post subject: 

Jasbar wrote:
A demand is identified. The only reason a licence can be refused if there is no significant demand.

Methinks Cllr Keir has just broken the Law. I wonder whether a flagrant breach of the Law is a criminal offence. Certainly worth a look.

Cllr Keir is certainly corrupt. Whatever game he isplaying it doesn't involve political truth, honesty or any semblance of the alleged democratic political accountability we're supposed to enjoy.



The CGSA is quite clear on this.
There must be No SUD for an authority to refuse a licence application. Proof of SUD is not required for a grant, proof of No SUD is for a refusal.
Refusing one without proof of No SUD is not in accordance with the act, and the application would most likely either be remitted back or granted by the Sheriff on appeal.

CEC have travelled this road several times now, and must be well aware of the requirements. so it could be considered deliberate flauting of the act. Whether that in itself is a criminal act, I will leave for others to debate. I'm just not sure.

Is there any case law on this?

Page 1 of 5 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/