http://www.scotborders.gov.uk/life/appl ... 25406.html
they did not have a clue of how a taxi works
| Taxi Driver Online http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| tariff increase passed http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11418 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | skippy41 [ Tue May 12, 2009 12:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | tariff increase passed |
http://www.scotborders.gov.uk/life/appl ... 25406.html
they did not have a clue of how a taxi works |
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Tue May 12, 2009 8:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tariff increase passed |
skippy41 wrote: http://www.scotborders.gov.uk/life/applyingfor/licences/25406.html
they did not have a clue of how a taxi works That makes two of them then 
CC |
|
| Author: | toots [ Tue May 12, 2009 8:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tariff increase passed |
captain cab wrote: skippy41 wrote: http://www.scotborders.gov.uk/life/applyingfor/licences/25406.html they did not have a clue of how a taxi works That makes two of them then CC Who's the other one 
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Tue May 12, 2009 9:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tariff increase passed |
toots wrote: captain cab wrote: skippy41 wrote: http://www.scotborders.gov.uk/life/applyingfor/licences/25406.html they did not have a clue of how a taxi works That makes two of them then CC Who's the other one blonde moment? CC |
|
| Author: | toots [ Tue May 12, 2009 9:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tariff increase passed |
captain cab wrote: toots wrote: captain cab wrote: skippy41 wrote: http://www.scotborders.gov.uk/life/applyingfor/licences/25406.html they did not have a clue of how a taxi works That makes two of them then CC Who's the other one blonde moment? CC You can't possibly mean me cos I don't need to know. You wouldn't mean skippy would you 
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Tue May 12, 2009 9:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: tariff increase passed |
toots wrote: You can't possibly mean me cos I don't need to know. You wouldn't mean skippy would you Obviously, he's retarded 
CC |
|
| Author: | skippy41 [ Fri May 15, 2009 5:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
|
|
| Author: | Smoked Glass [ Fri May 15, 2009 6:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
skippy41 wrote: but what about the 25% night rate?? The council should be sent a bunch of roses not moaned to by short-sighted operators. All I heard for the last 5 years has been shouting all over the country for the rates should go up.
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Fri May 15, 2009 9:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Whats wrong with charging more for unsociable hours? The reason we have extra charges for unsociable hours is to encourage cab drivers to work. CC |
|
| Author: | cabbyman [ Fri May 15, 2009 9:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
We have a 50% uplift for 'unsocial' hours. |
|
| Author: | Smoked Glass [ Fri May 15, 2009 10:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
captain cab wrote: Whats wrong with charging more for unsociable hours? sounds good to me
The reason we have extra charges for unsociable hours is to encourage cab drivers to work. CC |
|
| Author: | skippy41 [ Sat May 16, 2009 12:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
captain cab wrote: Whats wrong with charging more for unsociable hours?
The reason we have extra charges for unsociable hours is to encourage cab drivers to work. CC I have just come in for a coffee, and there are 62 cabs doing nothing, 8 on the rank the rest waiting to get on in a car-park 300 yards away,most of the borders working population are on the minimum wage, so they don't have the finances most only ever go out one night a week as that's all they can afford. If we accept this rise it will kill us all, it bad enough now for most of them |
|
| Author: | toots [ Sat May 16, 2009 2:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
skippy41 wrote: captain cab wrote: Whats wrong with charging more for unsociable hours? The reason we have extra charges for unsociable hours is to encourage cab drivers to work. CC I have just come in for a coffee, and there are 62 cabs doing nothing, 8 on the rank the rest waiting to get on in a car-park 300 yards away,most of the borders working population are on the minimum wage, so they don't have the finances most only ever go out one night a week as that's all they can afford. If we accept this rise it will kill us all, it bad enough now for most of them Does it matter if you accept the rise, you don't have to charge it, that's the maximum charge. The fare can be discounted so what's the problem
|
|
| Author: | gusmac [ Sat May 16, 2009 6:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
toots wrote: skippy41 wrote: captain cab wrote: Whats wrong with charging more for unsociable hours? The reason we have extra charges for unsociable hours is to encourage cab drivers to work. CC I have just come in for a coffee, and there are 62 cabs doing nothing, 8 on the rank the rest waiting to get on in a car-park 300 yards away,most of the borders working population are on the minimum wage, so they don't have the finances most only ever go out one night a week as that's all they can afford. If we accept this rise it will kill us all, it bad enough now for most of them Does it matter if you accept the rise, you don't have to charge it, that's the maximum charge. The fare can be discounted so what's the problem Thin end of the wedge, toots. Start doing that on the rank and the guys will end up cutting each others' throats for every job. |
|
| Author: | Smoked Glass [ Sat May 16, 2009 11:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
captain cab wrote: Whats wrong with charging more for unsociable hours? No one has said there is anything wrong with charging more for unsociable hours. It seems only the taxi operators in the paper extract[Quote Graham Grey] But when you get a council who are leading on it they should be supported by their own licensed taxis. The operators just give out the work they aren't the ones who are out there at 2am taking the drunks home.
The reason we have extra charges for unsociable hours is to encourage cab drivers to work. CC |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|