charles007 wrote:
Blackburn ex-member agree
What just the one of them?
| Taxi Driver Online http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| Blackburn ex-member http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=14247 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | charles007 [ Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Blackburn ex-member |
Blackburn ex-member agree suject to impact assessment the E7 and other alternative purpose built Hackney vehicls in Blackburn after a long battle. |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Blackburn ex-member |
charles007 wrote: Blackburn ex-member agree
What just the one of them?
|
|
| Author: | charles007 [ Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | No |
No All of them, even after Mr Overton asked them not two subject to a positive Disability Impact Assessment. |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No |
charles007 wrote: No All of them, even after Mr Overton asked them not two subject to a positive Disability Impact Assessment.
Haven't got a f***ing clue what you are on about.
|
|
| Author: | toots [ Mon Jun 14, 2010 6:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No |
Sussex wrote: charles007 wrote: No All of them, even after Mr Overton asked them not two subject to a positive Disability Impact Assessment. Haven't got a f***ing clue what you are on about. I was going to say that but then thought better of it  I think maybe they've agreed what is to be included in an assessment of the E7 and other alternative WAV's, perhaps
|
|
| Author: | skippy41 [ Mon Jun 14, 2010 6:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I would have thought that after the Liverpool judgment there should be no assessment needed, just the quick implementation |
|
| Author: | dagger [ Mon Jun 14, 2010 6:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
skippy41 wrote: I would have thought that after the Liverpool judgment there should be no assessment needed, just the quick implementation I wouldn't spend money on any assesment judging on the Liverpool E7 fiasco as up to now the number of them I've seen is a big fat zero, except Taxifix struggling to flog them.
|
|
| Author: | toots [ Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
dagger wrote: skippy41 wrote: I would have thought that after the Liverpool judgment there should be no assessment needed, just the quick implementation I wouldn't spend money on any assesment judging on the Liverpool E7 fiasco as up to now the number of them I've seen is a big fat zero, except Taxifix struggling to flog them.I'm sure I've seen one, but, only one 
|
|
| Author: | gusmac [ Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Is anyone buying brand new WAVs at the moment? |
|
| Author: | skippy41 [ Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
dagger wrote: skippy41 wrote: I would have thought that after the Liverpool judgment there should be no assessment needed, just the quick implementation I wouldn't spend money on any assesment judging on the Liverpool E7 fiasco as up to now the number of them I've seen is a big fat zero, except Taxifix struggling to flog them.But cab owners now have the freedom of choice and can save money on buying and fuel, and the RFL and possibly insurance |
|
| Author: | dagger [ Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
toots wrote: dagger wrote: skippy41 wrote: I would have thought that after the Liverpool judgment there should be no assessment needed, just the quick implementation I wouldn't spend money on any assesment judging on the Liverpool E7 fiasco as up to now the number of them I've seen is a big fat zero, except Taxifix struggling to flog them.I'm sure I've seen one, but, only one 
|
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
gusmac wrote: Is anyone buying brand new WAVs at the moment?
The converters of the new WAV mercs have increased production by a third. 
|
|
| Author: | toots [ Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
dagger wrote: toots wrote: dagger wrote: skippy41 wrote: I would have thought that after the Liverpool judgment there should be no assessment needed, just the quick implementation I wouldn't spend money on any assesment judging on the Liverpool E7 fiasco as up to now the number of them I've seen is a big fat zero, except Taxifix struggling to flog them.I'm sure I've seen one, but, only one Well whilst I'm in full swing it's 'you're'
|
|
| Author: | charles007 [ Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No |
Sussex wrote: charles007 wrote: No All of them, even after Mr Overton asked them not two subject to a positive Disability Impact Assessment. Haven't got a f***ing clue what you are on about. sorry the my limited posting are are not of words that you can understand may be some one will tell you. 
|
|
| Author: | toots [ Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No |
charles007 wrote: Sussex wrote: charles007 wrote: No All of them, even after Mr Overton asked them not two subject to a positive Disability Impact Assessment. Haven't got a f***ing clue what you are on about. sorry the my limited posting are are not of words that you can understand may be some one will tell you. Charles have you acquired a stutter Anyway perhaps if you tried to explain it more fully it would help us, please
|
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|