Taxi Driver Online

Toots writes:




What are you wittering on about now, what legal aid? Are you completely off your head?

The council needs only to grant the licence applications and no court case would be necessary in the first place.

At this moment in time there is no court case being supported by legal aid.

If legal aid was to be applied for and granted. It would be as a direct consequence of the council's decision and your right to challenge that decision through the courts.

I thought you carried someone's bags in and out of court for a number of years?

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!

Sorry Mr T. I got to the bit at the start proclaiming that ITS was back and I binned it. The thought of the scumbag Greenhalgh returning to the taxi trade was just too much for me

2627 views for COOLKY 1?

What drove this topic's popularity?

Fear of COOLKY?

Or the manic blandness of Toot's offerings?

Who can point out the oxymoron?

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related

My comment about the legal aid was a sarcastic reference to your previous court case which adjourned several times. I could be wrong but I think you were hoping to obtain legal aid then. Anyway back to my point of the £8,000. Why didn't you apply for a licence and when refused take the council to court whilst you had the cash to do so? Perhaps you've already had a plate issued then sold it? Perhaps you prefer to just moan about the injustices of the system as you see them?

Whatever the case if and when they do de-restrict you'll be wishing you'd kept hold of that cash cos you'll be needing it

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!

Why?

And with yet another court victory today, why would I have ny fear of due process?





BTW Better luck next time Gladys

victory?

Apparently he posted on the dark side site earlier in the year, that his plate case was due in November

Never said you did

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!

Sure, I proved that the CCTV cameras being used by British Transport Police and Network Rail in Waverley station are being used illegally.

I also proved that the pedestrian crossing in the station is not a legal Zebra crossing. Pedestrians have no special right to be on it under the Road Traffic Act or Pelican Puffin and Zebra crossings legislation other than that accorded them when crossing a normal road.

That's quite a victory, eh?

I've just proved that the state and police are oppressive and incompetent.

I'm chuffed that I've been able to do this while you guys would just have rolled over and taken it up the choccy.

Word on the grapevine is that Gladys is beilin



Now tell me. Should I do my public duty and tell the public about this now or wait and see how the authorities react to the decision?

After all, any convictions secured which depended on these cameras for corroboration would be unsafe and would be quashed on an appeal?

And, this wouldn't just apply to Edinburgh, but to every statiuon on the network which has no signage that cameras are being deployed or proper permission hasn't been sought.







I could be handing out "Get out of jail free" cards with zealous impunity


BTW I am also satisfied, and this should be a warning to us all, that cops are inveterate liars. They may have been tutored by the Tulliallan charm school, but they're only interested in compromising you. That's what gets the notch on their belt to justify their existence in the numbers game policing that poses as a public service.

In my case I am satisfied that the officer claimed alleged statements which were allegedly made before a caution was issued and wrote them up in his complaint as if they had been made after the caution was issued in order to create mens rea - intent.

The watchword is that if a cop is going to charge you there is nothing you can say that will alter this. So say absolutely NOTHING.

Just make sure he supplies you with his collar number before the matter proceeds so that you may make an informed complaint about him should you wish to do so. And let's all make as many complaints as we can, if only because we're all fed up of being rousted by cops just because we're cabbies.

_________________
Skull, "You are a police inspector, aren't you?"
Cab Inspector Smith, "Yes."
Skull, "So, are you going to tell Mr Taylor what his rights are?"
Smith, "And ... What rights?"

What you asking us for? You don't care what we think, I suggest you do what makes you happy

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!

Sorry Toots, I know it's hard for your ego to comprehend, but I wasn't asking you. As I don't value any of the tripe you spout you should perhaps now realise that you are irrelevant.

Now please don't destroy this thread like you caused the other one to be locked.

Go away and let debate happen.

_________________
Skull, "You are a police inspector, aren't you?"
Cab Inspector Smith, "Yes."
Skull, "So, are you going to tell Mr Taylor what his rights are?"
Smith, "And ... What rights?"

Pardon me for breathing. Go feck yourself yer tit

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!

As you start in the quote with "Now tell me" and as you end with a question mark, perhaps you could in future list all those who may or perhaps list those who may not be allowed to answer a question you pose. Otherwise, surely, all may respond.

My own answer is, you must do what you feel is right, whether or not it makes happy is purely coincidental. (If I am allowed to answer that is.)

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related