| Taxi Driver Online http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| Central's Murray Fleming ..... http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=15741 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Jasbar [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 1:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Central's Murray Fleming ..... |
How come he's been in "power" for so long? Who does Central Radio Taxis really belong to? The members? Or Fleming? |
|
| Author: | toots [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 1:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
|
|
|
| Author: | Stationtone [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 1:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Toots that's to solid to be Jasbar he is the liquid you get rid of when you are sick with food poison. He is the irritable dog shxt that your neighbours do not pick up 
|
|
| Author: | Jasbar [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
stationtone wrote: Toots that's to solid to be Jasbar he is the liquid you get rid of when you are sick with food poison. He is the irritable dog shxt that your neighbours do not pick up
Aye, that shows your linguistic skill 
NOT!!!! Now, let's ask another question. Members drive taxis. Murray's supposed to be a member. When was the last time Murray drove a taxi? 
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ahhh so you do know the STF
ffs that took no doing whatsoever. Its a good job you aint the crook in Miss Marple........the f*cking show would be over in 5 minutes
CC |
|
| Author: | Jasbar [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 6:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
captain cab wrote: Ahhh so you do know the STF
ffs that took no doing whatsoever. Its a good job you aint the crook in Miss Marple........the f*cking show would be over in 5 minutes CC Quality. You gotta explain this one Mr "Reasonable Rape". This should be a lesson in logic for us all
|
|
| Author: | Jasbar [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 6:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
QUESTION: If there were no proxy votes, and the members actually had to turn out to vote, would Fleming still be in place? |
|
| Author: | grandad [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 6:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Jasbar wrote: QUESTION:
If there were no proxy votes, and the members actually had to turn out to vote, would Fleming still be in place? Who cares? |
|
| Author: | LongshanksED [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Why do you care mr Taylor Are trying to lead us all down your path like "the pied piper" |
|
| Author: | Jasbar [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Members own taxis and pay radio dues. Question: Given the devious lengths Fleming went to in order to hide Colky's lack of taxi ownership,. contrary to the clear rules of the Company, does the esteemed Secretary Fleming really own a taxi and, if so, does he pay radio dues for it? Thanks to the Pied Piper on the fanny forum for reminding me
http://www.thetaxiforum.com/index.php?topic=1484.0 BTW Really Snanksy. You think I would be so obvious
But no, I'm NOT The Pied Piper He's obviously just yet another who can see the scandal and who's playing a pretty tune.
|
|
| Author: | LongshanksED [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 1:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Jasbar wrote: Thanks to the Pied Piper on the fanny forum for reminding me
http://www.thetaxiforum.com/index.php?topic=1484.0 BTW Really Snanksy. You think I would be so obvious But no, I'm NOT The Pied Piper He's obviously just yet another who can see the scandal and who's playing a pretty tune. Really The pied piper just happens to post about this and within 2 mins of his post going up, on a site that has had little traffic on it recently, you happen to post a thread on here about the same matter as "he reminded you" Ok then, I'll give you that one as circumstantial evidence doesn't prove guilt |
|
| Author: | swannee [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Jasbar wrote: Members own taxis and pay radio dues.
Question: Given the devious lengths Fleming went to in order to hide Colky's lack of taxi ownership,. contrary to the clear rules of the Company, does the esteemed Secretary Fleming really own a taxi and, if so, does he pay radio dues for it? Thanks to the Pied Piper on the fanny forum for reminding me http://www.thetaxiforum.com/index.php?topic=1484.0 BTW Really Snanksy. You think I would be so obvious But no, I'm NOT The Pied Piper He's obviously just yet another who can see the scandal and who's playing a pretty tune. Right Mr Knowall, maybe you could tell us which "clear rules of the company" were breached? I doubt you even know any of that company's rules, since all you repeat is hearsay and innuendo. Surprise us all with some factual information for a change. Bet you don't have any facts to quote. |
|
| Author: | Jasbar [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
swannee wrote: Jasbar wrote: Members own taxis and pay radio dues. Question: Given the devious lengths Fleming went to in order to hide Colky's lack of taxi ownership,. contrary to the clear rules of the Company, does the esteemed Secretary Fleming really own a taxi and, if so, does he pay radio dues for it? Thanks to the Pied Piper on the fanny forum for reminding me http://www.thetaxiforum.com/index.php?topic=1484.0 BTW Really Snanksy. You think I would be so obvious But no, I'm NOT The Pied Piper He's obviously just yet another who can see the scandal and who's playing a pretty tune. Right Mr Knowall, maybe you could tell us which "clear rules of the company" were breached? I doubt you even know any of that company's rules, since all you repeat is hearsay and innuendo. Surprise us all with some factual information for a change. Bet you don't have any facts to quote. Are you saying Fleming didn't know that Colky had sold his taxi to him, retaining a directorship which he used to justify his position on the board? Fleming knew nothing of this ruse? And, if it wasn't a breach of rules, why the need to be devious, why not just declare the position? Would the members have voted onto their board someone who didn't have a stake in a taxi? Dearir me. Poor old Coolky. According to you there was no need for him to jump ship taking company data with him. What a massive error of judgement, eh?
Fact is in any normal Company the stench of Coolky's jumping ship would have only been cleansed by a full enquiry. Of course, those on the board would have held such an enquiry and wouldn't they have had to know also. Dominoes come to mind here. BTW Aly boy kindly gave us a copy of your rules and regulations while we were stiffing him and his process.
Shall I dig them out - publish them. As a record of the proceedings of course. I would be in my right to do so.
Which is why any sensible counsel would have taken our offer of silence for financial settlement. But you ersepiece leaders refused. That's the wisdom of your boys, Fleming included. Which suggests to me that he, and they, are not fit for office. |
|
| Author: | Nidge [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 6:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
It's a wonder you've not been done over yet Jasbar. Your not making any Friends with your tirade of abuse towards Taxi Drivers in your "OWN" City. If you were doing the same round here you would have been shut up months ago. |
|
| Author: | Jasbar [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Midlander wrote: It's a wonder you've not been done over yet Jasbar. Your not making any Friends with your tirade of abuse towards Taxi Drivers in your "OWN" City. If you were doing the same round here you would have been shut up months ago.
Not that it's any of your concern, but I don't concern myself with "threats". Just know that once the genie's bottle is open there won't be anyone going back in. Get it?
BTW If that's how YOU conduct yourself then you're NOT fit and proper.
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|