Taxi Driver Online
http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Complaint against Chief Constable David Strang 21/10/2009
http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=15792		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Jasbar [ Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:15 am ]
Post subject:  Complaint against Chief Constable David Strang 21/10/2009
I charge that the system, as administered by the Law officers involved, is intent on negating the rights of taxi drivers to operate under the protection of the Law, because of institutional laziness and possibly even a desire not to record crimes which would have an adverse effect on crime statistics.

In adopting this position and the flawed operational procedures which support it, not only is Lothian and Borders Police negating the rights of individuals to the protection of the Law, and allowing thieves to get off Scot free, but it is also potentially placing at risk members of the public whose conduct could incite a violent response from those whom they refuse to pay for a legitimately incurred taxi fare.

The cops ignored the warning.

A cabbie is now in jail

Next time - a fatality?
Author:  LongshanksED [ Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:00 pm ]
Post subject: 
Here's an idea

Why not make an appointment with said inspectors and officals or even go to chap their doors and air your comments to them in person instead of creating a plethora of threads that they'll never answer


Then come back and report your feedback
Author:  Jasbar [ Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:36 pm ]
Post subject: 
LongshanksED wrote:
Here's an idea

Why not make an appointment with said inspectors and officals or even go to chap their doors and air your comments to them in person instead of creating a plethora of threads that they'll never answer


Then come back and report your feedback


Wanna come with me?

:lol:

Problem is we know how they operate. We've engaged with the council, gone along to meet with them - twice.

We've sat in from of agent smith. The face of the cops is no less palatable.

An inspector investigating the Chief Constable.

That's taking the pash.

Anyway, we've always been available for sensible discourse. :wink:
Author:  Skull [ Wed Jan 12, 2011 8:52 pm ]
Post subject: 
LongshanksED wrote:
Here's an idea

Why not make an appointment with said inspectors and officals or even go to chap their doors and air your comments to them in person instead of creating a plethora of threads that they'll never answer


Then come back and report your feedback



Let's assume someone makes a malicious complaint against you longshanksED, how do you handle it?

Do you keep schtum, or do you spill your guts in some vain hope this will garner you favour with Frank, or possibly the Regulatory Committee (RC) at a later date?

“Oh Frank, I'm a good little cabby, and I would never say or do anything like that. Frank, why are you dropping your trousers and taking your dick out?” :shock:


:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

:lol:
Author:  Jasbar [ Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:16 pm ]
Post subject: 
How does a dick take out a dick?

Oh, you ARE a card Skull.

And, garner? Garner for fecks sake.

Sound's to me like Grasshopper's now better than the master :lol:
Author:  Private Reggie [ Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:56 pm ]
Post subject: 
Jasbar wrote:
How does a dick take out a dick?

Oh, you ARE a card Skull.

And, garner? Garner for fecks sake.

Sound's to me like Grasshopper's now better than the master :lol:

Are you admitting your BLINDed by your own views masser :?: Grasshopper was eventually found in a wardrobe!!! Don't w-nk yourself to death Skull, i'm sure masser would give you his BLINDing advice on how not to w-nk yourself to death :lol: Although he did end up Blind :lol:
Author:  Jasbar [ Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:27 pm ]
Post subject: 
Private Reggie wrote:
Jasbar wrote:
How does a dick take out a dick?

Oh, you ARE a card Skull.

And, garner? Garner for fecks sake.

Sound's to me like Grasshopper's now better than the master :lol:

Are you admitting your BLINDed by your own views masser :?: Grasshopper was eventually found in a wardrobe!!! Don't w-nk yourself to death Skull, i'm sure masser would give you his BLINDing advice on how not to w-nk yourself to death :lol: Although he did end up Blind :lol:


:roll:
Author:  captain cab [ Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:40 pm ]
Post subject: 
Private Reggie wrote:
Are you admitting your BLINDed by your own views masser :?: Grasshopper was eventually found in a wardrobe!!! Don't w-nk yourself to death Skull, i'm sure masser would give you his BLINDing advice on how not to w-nk yourself to death :lol: Although he did end up Blind :lol:


pmsl
Author:  Skull [ Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:43 pm ]
Post subject: 
captain cab wrote:
Private Reggie wrote:
Are you admitting your BLINDed by your own views masser :?: Grasshopper was eventually found in a wardrobe!!! Don't w-nk yourself to death Skull, i'm sure masser would give you his BLINDing advice on how not to w-nk yourself to death :lol: Although he did end up Blind :lol:


pmsl



For someone who thinks "rape is reasonable" you are easily amused. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Author:  captain cab [ Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:52 pm ]
Post subject: 
Skull wrote:

For someone who thinks "rape is reasonable" you are easily amused. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


I dont think rape is reasonable, but I do think Edinburgh's policy of regulation is.

CC
Author:  Jasbar [ Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:55 pm ]
Post subject: 
captain cab wrote:
Skull wrote:

For someone who thinks "rape is reasonable" you are easily amused. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


I dont think rape is reasonable, but I do think Edinburgh's policy of regulation is.

CC


You didn't understand Lady Smith then?

Put more water in your whisky CC.

:wink:
Author:  Skull [ Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:55 pm ]
Post subject: 
captain cab wrote:
Skull wrote:

For someone who thinks "rape is reasonable" you are easily amused. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


I dont think rape is reasonable, but I do think Edinburgh's policy of regulation is.

CC


Oh yes, you do think "rape is reasonable" and Edinburgh's policy of regulation is a joke, a bit like your NTA. :lol:
Author:  captain cab [ Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:04 am ]
Post subject: 
Are you still not quoting the Judge correctly Jim?

But as I stated;

I dont think rape is reasonable, but I do think Edinburgh's policy of regulation is.

CC
Author:  Skull [ Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:08 am ]
Post subject: 
captain cab wrote:
Are you still not quoting the Judge correctly Jim?

But as I stated;

I dont think rape is reasonable, but I do think Edinburgh's policy of regulation is.

CC


CC, you blew it big style and within the context of a thread on rape. For you "Rape will always be Reasonable".
:roll: :lol:
Author:  captain cab [ Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:10 am ]
Post subject: 
But as I stated;

I dont think rape is reasonable, but I do think Edinburgh's policy of regulation is.

CC
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/