Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 5:52 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Carlisle taxi driver [sic] must re-take test after being caught using mobile phone

Thursday, 10 February 2011

A Carlisle private-hire car driver who has twice been caught using a mobile phone at the wheel has been ordered to re-sit the taxi driving test.

Stephen Oliphant, 62, of Aglionby, was first spotted in December 2007 when he was issued with a fixed-penalty notice and three points on his driving licence.

He was caught again in February last year.

On both occasions he failed to notify Carlisle City Council within seven days as he is supposed to.

The offences came to light only when he renewed his taxi licence.

Mr Oliphant appeared before the council’s regulatory panel yesterday.

Councillors decided against revoking or suspending his licence.

But panel chairman David Morton said: “We are asking the licensing manager to issue a stern letter of warning and require you to take the Driving Standards Agency [taxi] test within 26 weeks.

“If you fail to pass your licence will be automatically revoked.”

Mr Oliphant told councillors that his failure to report the offences had been an “oversight”.

He said: “In the first instance I was in a queue of traffic and the phone rang.

“I answered because I knew it was the office. I was spotted and owned up to it. It was a pure oversight not reporting it.

“There were no passengers in the vehicle.

“The last occasion I was in my van, I checked my phone and there was a message. Why I put it to my ear I don’t know because I wasn’t making a call.

“As for not reporting it, I had my wife and mother in hospital and there was a lot going on in my mind. I can assure you this will not happen again.”

Source; http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/carli ... rPath=news

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
How will re-taking the test help in this instance?

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57358
Location: 1066 Country
grandad wrote:
How will re-taking the test help in this instance?

It wont, the committee wanted him punished but didn't want to suspend or ban him.

This is just a silly compromise.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Sussex wrote:
grandad wrote:
How will re-taking the test help in this instance?

It wont, the committee wanted him punished but didn't want to suspend or ban him.

This is just a silly compromise.


Maybe the use of bluetooth is covered in the test. :mrgreen:

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
grandad wrote:
How will re-taking the test help in this instance?

It wont, the committee wanted him punished but didn't want to suspend or ban him.

This is just a silly compromise.


I agree.

But.....he was either fit and proper.....or not fit and proper?

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57358
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
But.....he was either fit and proper.....or not fit and proper?

Clearly he is not now, equally clearly he will be by the end of the month. [-(

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
Clearly he is not now, equally clearly he will be by the end of the month. [-(


I may be alone here, but I dont actually think a council has the power to make a punishment.......they only license on the basis of their interpretation of propriety.

Clearly......these councils may be better running taxi forums.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 11:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
captain cab wrote:
Clearly......these councils may be better running taxi forums.

They'd have to learn about Taxis to do that wouldn't they? eusasmiles.zip

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 11:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Chris the Fish wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Clearly......these councils may be better running taxi forums.

They'd have to learn about Taxis to do that wouldn't they? eusasmiles.zip


I wouldnt say that would affect certain sections of the website.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 11:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
captain cab wrote:
I wouldnt say that would affect certain sections of the website.

It might affect some future decisions they make. :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Chris the Fish wrote:
captain cab wrote:
I wouldnt say that would affect certain sections of the website.

It might affect some future decisions they make. :lol: :lol: :lol:


You are sooooooo right.

Have you checked out your councils policy on 'Habitual or Vexatious complainant’s'.

I have, and I think Jim Taylor could be classified under the section described as;

“Some complainants may have a mental health disability and there is a need to be sensitive in circumstances of that kind.”

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
Only in my Councils'. :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Chris the Fish wrote:
Only in my Councils'. :lol: :lol: :lol:


:?:

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
captain cab wrote:
You are sooooooo right.

Have you checked out your councils policy on 'Habitual or Vexatious complainant’s'.

I have, and I think Jim Taylor could be classified under the section described as;

“Some complainants may have a mental health disability and there is a need to be sensitive in circumstances of that kind.”

CC

It would seem from your use of language that you, CC, have checked my Councils policy.

I would surmise from that, that you have not necessarily checked your Councils policy.

I thought someone else could not detect sarcasm.

It seems that you can't either. :wink:

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
Chris the Fish wrote:
captain cab wrote:
You are sooooooo right.

Have you checked out your councils policy on 'Habitual or Vexatious complainant’s'.

I have, and I think Jim Taylor could be classified under the section described as;

“Some complainants may have a mental health disability and there is a need to be sensitive in circumstances of that kind.”

CC

It would seem from your use of language that you, CC, have checked my Councils policy.

I would surmise from that, that you have not necessarily checked your Councils policy.

I thought someone else could not detect sarcasm.

It seems that you can't either. :wink:


Perhaps your wit needs some work.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 745 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group