What a vvanker.

I take it you mean the d*khead ars*hole on the council who thought he was a judge who could hand out punishment sentences?

Is this what our nation has come to?

Fact is that the council is not mandated to hand out punishments lke this to licence holders.

There are no punishment powers provided for in the CGSA.

All punishments handed down by our judicial processes require clear guidelines, acknowledgement of precedent, set penalties for specific transgressions and a right of appeal. Because of this, those who find themselves explaining their actions to have no Equality before the Law, which is enshrined in the European Convention of Human Rights and which is adopted by the Human Rights Act 1998, superior legislation to the CGSA.

Coumcillors have no formal training to deal with punishments.

They do this because they are not challenged and they hold the hearings in camera, so that the rest of us can't see how dictatorially and unreasonably they behave.

And of course because taxi drivers are stupid. They think that they are never going to fall foul of these draconian rules so they don't concern themselves with what's going down. Of course to consider that your fellow cabbie is being treated in this way is bad for all doesn't even cross they mind. That's how truly stupid they are.

And of course, the bloodsuckers and self-illusionists in organisations like the NTA and STF wouldn't contemplate raising the issue, lest it imperils their cosy relationship with those who are shafting us.

So, why should some bus driver, or grocer, or other tradesmen be able, without formal training or qualification, to judge others and punish them?

The law is clear. The council has the power to determine whether it believes someone is unfit to hold a licence. Any decision to remove a licence is appealable to the Sheriff Court.

The council has the power to suspend licences to protect the public. There is no provision for temporary suspensions.

So the four month suspension, if the period was specifically stipulated at the outset, is illegal and a breach of human rights.

Edinburgh's council knows this. They have adopted the practice of suspending licences until normal renewal, when they allow those whom they are shafting to reapply and be granted. We know this. This is also an abrogation of the Act and a breach of Human Rights.

No doubt councillors get their rocks off as they salivate while stiffing licence holders. That's the paucity of these individuals. Why they are scumbags

I refer to the Sheriff in Dumfries, specific case details forgotten but a lawyer could find it, who stated that such temporary suspensions were "illogical".

So Midlander, I trust that this is what tinled over your brain when your your mind meandered over the border and you punched the epithet "vvanker" on your keyboard.

I take it you mean the d*khead ars*hole on the council who thought he was a judge who could hand out punishment sentences?

Is this what our nation has come to?

Fact is that the council is not mandated to hand out punishments lke this to licence holders.

There are no punishment powers provided for in the CGSA.

All punishments handed down by our judicial processes require clear guidelines, acknowledgement of precedent, set penalties for specific transgressions and a right of appeal. Because of this, those who find themselves explaining their actions to have no Equality before the Law, which is enshrined in the European Convention of Human Rights and which is adopted by the Human Rights Act 1998, superior legislation to the CGSA.

Coumcillors have no formal training to deal with punishments.

They do this because they are not challenged and they hold the hearings in camera, so that the rest of us can't see how dictatorially and unreasonably they behave.

And of course because taxi drivers are stupid. They think that they are never going to fall foul of these draconian rules so they don't concern themselves with what's going down. Of course to consider that your fellow cabbie is being treated in this way is bad for all doesn't even cross they mind. That's how truly stupid they are.

And of course, the bloodsuckers and self-illusionists in organisations like the NTA and STF wouldn't contemplate raising the issue, lest it imperils their cosy relationship with those who are shafting us.

So, why should some bus driver, or grocer, or other tradesmen be able, without formal training or qualification, to judge others and punish them?

The law is clear. The council has the power to determine whether it believes someone is unfit to hold a licence. Any decision to remove a licence is appealable to the Sheriff Court.

The council has the power to suspend licences to protect the public. There is no provision for temporary suspensions.

So the four month suspension, if the period was specifically stipulated at the outset, is illegal and a breach of human rights.

Edinburgh's council knows this. They have adopted the practice of suspending licences until normal renewal, when they allow those whom they are shafting to reapply and be granted. We know this. This is also an abrogation of the Act and a breach of Human Rights.

No doubt councillors get their rocks off as they salivate while stiffing licence holders. That's the paucity of these individuals. Why they are scumbags

I refer to the Sheriff in Dumfries, specific case details forgotten but a lawyer could find it, who stated that such temporary suspensions were "illogical".

So Midlander, I trust that this is what tinled over your brain when your your mind meandered over the border and you punched the epithet "vvanker" on your keyboard.

Shut up

He's grouchy, he and gary have been on holiday, they've just returned.

CC

The picture's missing again

I can see it now!

What a sh*te answer ffs.

CC

By the way, why is it that when I repeated a huge post and added a couple of words just to show how ignorant that was it was deleted by admin, but when it's done by those who do it just because they can't be arsed and enjoy spoiling the threads it's left in situ?

FFS

PMSL

I wish you'd use a comma.

CC