mattyboy wrote:
Just to field the point about price comparison/bringing down prices
Would you rather have 100 airport taxi customers a year paying a £80 fare, or 200 paying a £60 fare?
On a simple profits comparison then it would depend on costs - unless costs were greater than £40 then the 200 paying £60 would be preferable.
If your costs were £30 (say) then with the dearer runs you'd make £50 a run, thus profits of £5k. But with the cheaper runs you'd make £30 a run, but this would yield a profit of £6k, thus you'd be £1k better off with the cheaper runs.
However, you might be making a grand more in profits, but you're taking twice the time to make only 20% more profit, so is the extra time expended really worth it?
However, I think the problem that some firms may have with your system is that (going on the ones I've looked at) then if you have two similar firms offering the same service then it's a no-brainer - the £60 firm gets all the work, while the £80 firm gets jack.
So the £80 firm goes down to £55, so the first firm goes down to £50 and so on, and a price war develops and no one wins.
Likewise, if you have two firms competing for the same job on your site and both are offering the same price then they will both be reluctant to raise their prices, because if you assume that with the same price then they each get half the work, then if one raises its prices then it will end up with jack and the other will get all the work.
Of course, it's not as straightforward as that, but my first impression on looking at your system is that it would be attractive to customers, but not to the trade because it makes price comparisons too easy.
One presentational point - why aren't your URLs and email addies to external sites active?