I had a fare once, where upon arriving at the destination, she wanted to go into her house for the money. I asked for something as security, and she handed me her custody discharge papers, as she had just been released from the police cells. I then asked if there was someone, I could call that would pay the fair on her behalf, and needless to say, there wasn't.
Next I phoned the police explaining the situation, and quoting her details directly from the custody papers. The police instructed me to bring her to the police station.
Upon my arrival at the station, I pointed to the CCTV, and told her that, if she bolted, it would mean arrest at a later date and being charged with taxi fraud. I opened the doors, and she was gone. And needless to say, some time later, she was arrested and charged.
The case went before the court three times before she was arrested and forced to appear.
However, despite all of this and because she maintained her position of intent to pay the fare, and as there was no evidence, to the contrary. The prosecutor explained that we lacked the necessary two independent forms of corroboration to convict on a charge of taxi fraud, and would I accept the £15 she now offered for the fare.
In short, to secure a conviction, I needed a refusal to pay or an admission of guilt.
