Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 2:45 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2018 8:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 13896
Taxi driver convicted after overcharging wheelchair using passenger

http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/161 ... passenger/

A TAXI driver who twice overcharged a passenger who used a wheelchair has been convicted of an offence under the Equality Act.

A taxi capable of carrying the wheelchair had been booked to take Peter Kelly, with his wife Tracy and her daughter Kerry Battersby, from their home in Westhoughton to a restaurant in Blackrod for Mrs Kelly's 50th birthday celebration.

But Bolton Magistrates' Court heard that driver Pervez Sajid, who had been sub-contracted by Timewise, charged them £17.50 for the five-and-a-half-mile journey.

Peter Horgan, prosecuting, told the court that Mr Kelly, who is disabled, and his family thought the ride, on May 19 last year, was expensive but became concerned when they learned that Mrs Kelly's son, Cllr Ryan Battersby, had made a similar journey to the restaurant in a different cab and only been charged just over £9.

After the meal 58-year-old Sajid arrived to take the Kellys back to their home in Greenfold Lane and, again, charged them £17.50.

Cllr Battersby decided to complain to Bolton Council about the charging and, on May 31, Sajid was questioned by a licensing enforcement officer.

Sajid, of Gilnow Road, Heaton, told the investigator that he had a double-sided card listing the charges for journeys. One side was the rate for carrying up to four passengers and on the other was the charges for a minibus used for four to eight passengers.

He claimed he had looked at the wrong side of the card when asking for payment from the Kellys and told the enforcement officer he would apologise and refund the overpayment.

Mr Horgan told the court that, in total, the Kellys were overcharged by £13.35.

"It is a small amount but it is, of course, the principle to ensure there is no discrimination towards anyone who is wheelchair-bound," said Mr Horgan.

Sajid pleaded guilty to failing to comply with a duty to carry people using wheelchairs without making an additional charge, an offence under Section 165 of the Equality Act 2010, which came into force in April last year.

In a prepared statement read out in court Sajid told magistrates that this was the only complaint about him in the 31 years he has been a taxi driver.

"This has upset my reputation which I am very proud of," he said.

"I am sorry for the mistake and reading the wrong side of the fare card.

"I had no intention of overcharging passengers because one person had access needs."

Magistrates sentenced him to a conditional discharge for 12 months and ordered him to pay £200 towards prosecution costs, plus £13.35 in compensation.

Chairman of the bench David Hendry told him: "You have to understand that taxi drivers are under a duty of care to all their passengers and that, of course, includes disabled passengers."

However, he added: "It is important to recognise that you, Mr Sajid, have been a taxi driver in Bolton for 31 years without a blemish and you offered to apologise and reimburse the monies."

Mr Kelly has been wheelchair-bound for four years after having a leg amputated.

His wife welcomed the outcome of the court case and said she hopes it deters other drivers from overcharging and encourages more wheelchair users to complain if they are being treated unfairly.

"It is more the principle," she said.

"Why should we be charged double for the same journey?"

It is the first time Bolton Council has brought such a prosecution and executive cabinet member for environmental services, Cllr Nick Peel said: "We wrote out to every private hire and taxi driver last year to forewarn them about the new regulations contained in the Equality Act, and that we would not hesitate to enforce its provisions.

"We have now demonstrated our resolve, supported by the magistrates' court, and I hope that this sends a clear signal, to that minority of drivers who may be tempted to flout the law, that will we not hesitate to protect the rights of disabled passengers.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2018 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54020
Location: 1066 Country
I wonder if a Councillor wasn't involved this would have made court.

The driver was a tit, but in my view this should never had made court.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 13896
Sussex wrote:
I wonder if a Councillor wasn't involved this would have made court.

The driver was a tit, but in my view this should never had made court.


Show trial [-(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 19180
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
make an example of someone and hope the rest fall into line :roll:

always works......................................




........................................oh look a flying pig

_________________
Taxis Are Public Transport too

Join the campaign to get April fools jokes banned for 364 days a year !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 7:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 13896
Five week suspension for Bolton driver convicted of overcharging wheelchair-user

http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/162 ... hair-user/

A TAXI driver who overcharged a wheelchair user has been suspended by licensing chiefs.

Bolton Council’s licensing and environmental regulation committee banned the hackney carriage driver from operating for five weeks.

Last week councillors considered a report by the authority’s director of place which set out allegations of misconduct against the driver, Pervez Sajid.

They heard the driver made his disabled passenger pay almost twice the fare his firm charged a relative travelling to the same venue — despite the journey only being “marginally longer”.

The complainant also told the licensing unit that the driver had failed to strap the wheelchair in place. This resulted in another passenger having to secure the chair by grabbing it whenever the vehicle turned a corner.

During an interview with the licensing unit, the Mr Sajid claimed he had mistakenly looked at the minibus fares, offered to pay the difference and insisted the wheelchair had been properly strapped in.

However the committee did not “fully accept the driver’s explanation of the circumstances” — partly on the grounds the he had “held a licence for many year and should have been experienced enough to know that it was a long fare for that journey.”

Minutes from the hearing, which was held in private, state: “Members of the public and in particular, the elderly, infirm and children or vulnerable adults entrust their personal safety and wellbeing to hackney carriage drivers whenever they take a journey.

“Passengers often travel alone and are vulnerable to inappropriate behaviour and dishonesty. The committee’s primary duty is of concern for the safety and wellbeing of the public.”

Mr Sajid pleaded guilty to the offence at the Bolton Magistrates Court in April. He received and a 12 month conditional discharge. He was also ordered to reimburse the customer and pay costs of £200. Under the Equality Act 2010 drivers are obliged to charge wheelchair users the same as other passengers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 4:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2468
Sussex wrote:
I wonder if a Councillor wasn't involved this would have made court.

The driver was a tit, but in my view this should never had made court.



If it was a TAXI(hackney carriage) that was sub-contracted to do the job and he charged the hackney carriage tariff for the 5.5 miles what if anything has the guy done wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 5:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 19651
heathcote wrote:
Sussex wrote:
I wonder if a Councillor wasn't involved this would have made court.

The driver was a tit, but in my view this should never had made court.



If it was a TAXI(hackney carriage) that was sub-contracted to do the job and he charged the hackney carriage tariff for the 5.5 miles what if anything has the guy done wrong.

He admitted using the rate for 5-8 passengers instead of the up to 4 passengers. Now he says it was a mistake but he did it twice so make your own mind up.

_________________
Grandad,
To support my charity text MAYORWALK to 70085 to donate £5


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 13896
heathcote wrote:
Sussex wrote:
I wonder if a Councillor wasn't involved this would have made court.

The driver was a tit, but in my view this should never had made court.



If it was a TAXI(hackney carriage) that was sub-contracted to do the job and he charged the hackney carriage tariff for the 5.5 miles what if anything has the guy done wrong.


It presumably wasn't an HC, or the meter would have been on rather than calculating the fare from a mileage card.

If it was an HC then presumably he was breaching the rules by not using his meter?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54020
Location: 1066 Country
heathcote wrote:
Sussex wrote:
I wonder if a Councillor wasn't involved this would have made court.

The driver was a tit, but in my view this should never had made court.



If it was a TAXI(hackney carriage) that was sub-contracted to do the job and he charged the hackney carriage tariff for the 5.5 miles what if anything has the guy done wrong.

If he hasn't done anything wrong then a) it wouldn't have made court, and b) he wouldn't have pleaded guilty.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 109 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group