Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 2:33 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 10:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54072
Location: 1066 Country
Taxi drivers fined for unlawfully soliciting fares

Four taxi drivers have been slapped with fines totalling over £6,000 for unlawfully soliciting fares at Henley Regatta.

Tahir Mehmood Awan, 53, from Maidenhead, admitted to illegally offering taxi services in Henley on June 30.

Mr Awan was brought before the Oxford Magistrates’ Court on February 23, where it was revealed that he had claimed to be working a pre-booked job that fell through.

Awan, who was not licensed by the South Oxfordshire District Council, took the opportunity to transport another rider back to his hometown for cash.

At the hearing, Mr Awan explained: "I had taken the customer’s number incorrectly and couldn’t make contact with them, and as I was going back to Maidenhead I might as well earn some money."

Despite Mr Awan's reasons, his unlicensed operation was seen as a threat to public safety and a move that undermined legal taxi drivers.

The court considering his early guilty plea and personal means, fined him £310, along with a victim surcharge of £120 and costs of £1,100.

On the same day, Yassar Mahmood, 39, also from Maidenhead, faced similar charges referring back to July 1.

Despite initially disputing the claims, Mr Mahmood also pleaded guilty in court and was ordered to pay a total of £1,358.

A third defendant, Haroon Qayyum, 39, from High Wycombe, was convicted on February 23 in his absence.

The court heard how Mr Qayyum had instructed a "passenger" to pretend they had pre-booked his service, unaware that the "passenger" was a South Oxfordshire licensing officer.

Mr Qayyum was subsequently fined £660, with a victim surcharge of £264 and costs of £1,100.

Mohammed Siddeeque, 46, from Reading, also admitted to illicit operation and was given a conditional discharge for 12 months and £1,126 in costs.

In court, Mr Siddeeque said: "I had a clean driving licence and held licences with TfL, and both Reading and Fareham councils and had never had problems previously."

Cllr David Rouane expressed serious concerns over the safety of residents.

The Leader of South Oxfordshire District Council stated: "We take the safety of our residents very seriously and our officers work hard to make sure unlicensed taxis are stopped from operating in our district.

"For your safety, I cannot stress the importance of pre-booking private hire vehicles.

"Pre-booking means there is a record of the journey, the driver, and the vehicle used, so in the event of any problems, the driver and vehicle can be traced."

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 13914
Haven't got the time today, but it's sometimes useful to compare press rehashes to official council press releases. But if I can only read one, then I'd generally choose the official version (of course, local press stuff sometimes add a few quotes from the trade, or whatever, and to that extent can be more worthwhile than the official version, but I doubt that's what happened in this case).

Anyway, this is the official version, and is obviously different from the version above because of the unusually long paragraphs :-o

Unless, of course, Sussex did post the same version, but split the paragraphs up for readability :?


Taxi drivers pay price for operating illegally at Henley Regatta

https://www.southoxon.gov.uk/uncategori ... y-regatta/

Four taxi drivers have been ordered to pay a total of over £6,000 for illegally plying for hire at Henley Regatta.

Tahir Mehmood Awan, 53, of Shepherds Close, Hurley, Maidenhead, pleaded guilty to unlawfully plying for hire at Henley on 30 June 2023. At a hearing at Oxford Magistrates’ Court on 23 February, the court heard that Mr Awan had told South Oxfordshire enforcement officers he was in Henley to pick up a pre booked fare but that the customer did not show up. Mr Awan was not licensed by South Oxfordshire District Council and therefore was not permitted to ply for hire in Henley. However, he did agree to take another passenger to Maidenhead, only accepting cash for that booking so that it didn’t go through his private hire operator. The court were told that Mr Awan or the vehicle that he was driving would not have been through the council’s fit and proper tests, and any unlicensed journey would undermine public safety. Furthermore, his actions were for personal gain and would take business away from properly licensed hackney carriage drivers who rely on an event like Henley Regatta. In mitigation, Mr Awan said he had taken the customer’s number incorrectly and couldn’t make contact with them, and as he was going back to Maidenhead he might as well earn some money. He told the court that since his arrival in the UK in 1993, he had never been in trouble and that he didn’t want to lose his taxi licence. The court took into account Mr Awan’s early guilty plea and his means and imposed a fine of £310, victim surcharge of £120 and costs of £1,100.

On 23 February at Oxford Magistrates’ Court, Mr Yassar Mahmood, 39, of Abercrombie Road, Maidenhead, was convicted of illegally plying for hire at Henley on 1 July 2023. Mr Mahmood had originally disputed that he had plied for hire because he maintained that he had told the “passenger” to book on the app before the journey could take place and he’d never invited the “passenger” to sit in the car. However, on 23 February he pleaded guilty to the charge against him. Magistrates took into account his early guilty plea and as a result of his actions Mr Mahmood was ordered to pay a fine of £184, victim surcharge of £74 and costs of £1,100.

In another separate case, on 23 February at Oxford Magistrates’ Court, Mr Haroon Qayyum, 39, of Benjamin Road, High Wycombe was ordered to pay a fine of £660, victim surcharge of £264 and costs of £1,100 after being convicted of illegally plying for hire in Henley on 1 July 2023. Magistrates found Mr Qayyum guilty in his absence after hearing how when a South Oxfordshire licensing officer approached Mr Qayyum, Mr Qayyum told the “passenger” to tell the officer that he had pre-booked the journey but unbeknown to the driver the passenger was in fact also a licensing officer.

Mohammed Siddeeque, 46, of Torcross Grove, Calcot, Reading also pleaded guilty to illegally plying for hire at Oxford Magistrates’ Court on 23 February. In mitigation, Mr Siddeeque told magistrates that he had a clean driving licence and held licences with TfL, and both Reading and Fareham councils and had never had problems previously. He was sorry for his actions and understood that when acting as a private hire driver he must make sure that anybody he carries is pre-booked. As a result of his actions, Mr Siddeeque was given a conditional discharge for 12 months and £1126 in costs.

Cllr David Rouane, Leader of South Oxfordshire District Council, said “We take the safety of our residents very seriously and our officers work hard to make sure unlicensed taxis are stopped from operating in our district. For your safety, I cannot stress the importance of pre-booking private hire vehicles. Pre-booking means there is a record of the journey, the driver, and the vehicle used, so in the event of any problems, the driver and vehicle can be traced.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 13914
Quote:
Magistrates found Mr Qayyum guilty in his absence after hearing how when a South Oxfordshire licensing officer approached Mr Qayyum, Mr Qayyum told the “passenger” to tell the officer that he had pre-booked the journey but unbeknown to the driver the passenger was in fact also a licensing officer.

Oops :oops: :lol:

Quote:
In mitigation, Mr Siddeeque told magistrates that he had a clean driving licence and held licences with TfL, and both Reading and Fareham councils and had never had problems previously.

Eh? He's badged and plated by three different licensing authorities? :-o

Now that's what I call cross-bordering :lol: (If I had to put money on it I'd guess that's more a historical thing than the current position, and it's just badly phrased. But certainly reads like he's currently licensed by two different councils, and TfL :? )


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 19223
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
there's always two events guaranteed to catch drivers out Henley and Cheltenham Gold cup week !

every year :lol:

_________________
Taxis Are Public Transport too

Join the campaign to get April fools jokes banned for 364 days a year !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 7:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 13914
In fact, I should have read just a few words of the piece posted by Sussex to realise it's not actually the official council press release divided into shorter paragraphs :-o

I mean, while council pressers aren't without fault, check out the first line of the press article:

A journalist wrote:
Four taxi drivers have been slapped with fines totalling over £6,000 for unlawfully soliciting fares at Henley Regatta

- Not 'taxi drivers' [-(

- Councils don't normally use phrases like 'slapped with fines' in official discourse [-(

- Not fines totalling over £6,000 anyway. Can't be bothering adding up the numbers, but I'd guess the £6,000 is mostly costs rather than fines [-(

- The drivers were illegally plying for hire rather than soliciting. Correct me if I'm wrong, but soliciting is more akin to actively touting fares rather than passively plying for hire, thus a different criminal offence, and one that's not so often featured in press articles [-(

- And, of course, the word 'soliciting' isn't used by the council here - it's been introduced by the journalist. But, ironically, the councillor quoted in the Market Harborough case the other day used the term 'unsolicited fares' with regard to the out-of-town cars, thus implying that soliciting was OK in certain circumstances. But since in my opinion soliciting is effectively touting, that's always a criminal offence. And it wasn't what the drivers at the Henley Regatta were doing [-(

But apart from all that in the first paragraph of the press article, I'm sure the rest of it is hunky dory [-(


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group