Taxi Driver Online

The headline in this official Stoke City Council is short and to the point.

But, surprise, surprise, isn't entirely accurate, as indeed is confirmed a couple of paragraphs down

The actual fine is just 16% or so of the headline figure.

Anyway, I wonder if the council here would be as holier-than-though if the driver had been badged locally.

In fairness, the press release doesn't really labour the cross-border point in any way. On the other hand, maybe that's the whole subtext to it all, but who knows?

Of course, the usual PR/soundbite stuff from 'Councillor Amjid Wazir OBE, cabinet member for enforcement and city pride at Stoke-on-Trent City Council' in the latter paragraphs. But an unusual addition from the prosecuting lawyer as well


Taxi driver fined £1280

https://www.stoke.gov.uk/news/article/2 ... %C2%A31280

A taxi driver has been sentenced following a council investigation into his refusal to carry guide dogs accompanying disabled passengers.

Mr Pouya Tajari, licensed by Wolverhampton City Council, was found guilty at North Staffordshire Magistrates Court and ordered to pay a £200 fine, £80 victim surcharge and £1000 costs.

In March 2024, the driver refused two residents with guide dogs for a journey from Abbey Hulton to Basford, claiming the dogs would dirty his vehicle.

When the passengers challenged him, he attempted to charge a fee to cover the cost of cleaning his car. The fare was £8.20 and Mr Tajari attempted to charge £15.

The case comes as the council has introduced new rules to make the city’s taxis safer and fairer. Last year, the city council’s cabinet approved changes that will mean all taxi owners must have DBS checks for unspent convictions and cautions.

Councillor Amjid Wazir OBE, cabinet member for enforcement and city pride at Stoke-on-Trent City Council, said: “It is a serious offence under the Equality Act for a taxi driver to refuse assistance or guide dogs accompanying a disabled passenger.

“Let this be a clear warning – we will not tolerate discrimination against those with disabilities in our city. We have robust checks in place to make sure taxi companies in the city are operating legally and fairly and we will pursue those who break the law through the courts where necessary.”

“We don’t want people to just get from ‘A to B’, we want passengers to feel safe and comfortable on their journey. The taxi firms play a vital part in building a safer city for all, with more than 1,870 city council licensed vehicles now operating in the city each year.”

Josef Cannon, Cornerstone Barristers, representing Stoke-on-Trent City Council said “It was great to help Stoke-on-Trent secure this outcome, and in particular encouraging to see the two victims attend, give evidence and be believed, despite the long time it has taken to bring this matter to court. The victims showed exceptional bravery to do so.”

I suspect the total costs requested by the council far exceeded the amount the court granted.

_________________
IDFIMH

It sounds like he was doing the council a favour. I doubt very much he was doing it for sweet FA.

_________________
IDFIMH