Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun Sep 13, 2026 10:15 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Sep 12, 2026 4:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 19277
Oddly, this is on the Glasgwow Herald newspaper's webisite, as opposed to the Inverness Courier and P&J which led the charge last time round.

But, again oddly, this piece refers to the 'Courier', which is presumably the Inverness Courier. So looks like that's the source of this, but hasn't been edited appropriately. And it looks like a shared LDRS piece anyway :?


Calls for licensing review following rapist taxi driver scandal

https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/265 ... r-scandal/

Seven female councillors have called for an external review into Highland Council’s licensing committee following the recent scandal over a rapist taxi driver.

Ahead of a full council meeting on Thursday (September 17) a motion has been proposed by councillors Jackie Hendry, Emma Knox, Lyndsey Johnston, Kate MacLean, Sarah Atkin, Morven Reid and Kate Willis, calling on Highland Council to commission an external independent review of licensing.

It comes after the Courier revealed that convicted rapist David Brown was allowed to keep his taxi operator’s licence after a majority decision of the committee made behind closed doors.

Four of the seven women behind the motion are members of the licencing committee – Councillors Knox, Johnston, MacLean and Hendry. All four voted against the decision to allow the licences in Brown’s name to be continued.

The fall out after the result of the vote was made public saw four male councillors who voted in favour of Brown retaining his license resign from the committee, with plans for a vote of no confidence in the members later announced by Highland Council. This vote is also set for the full council meeting.

llr Atkin said “we have to do more to deal with it” beyond that vote of no confidence.

The motion calls for a review to be led by a qualified person independent of the council, with a review possibly considering the licensing committee’s operation and governance and the consistency in which the “fit and proper person” test is applied as well as safeguarding for women and the treatment of Police Scotland objections.

It could also look at “whether there are lessons to be learned regarding equality, unconscious bias, organisational culture or other factors that could potentially influence decision making.”

Cllr Atkin said: “I was more than happy to offer my support (to the motion) in how it was shaped.

“This is not kicking it in the long grass – we have to know how we got to where we got to for the public to have confidence in licensing again.”

Of the David Brown decision she said the “level of outrage” that followed was like “nothing I have known”.

If granted the motion would see the independent review initiated by the end of December, with a report to be brought back to the council by the end of March 2027.

The motion, however, also proposes that a review would not prevent the council from undertaking a shake-up of licensing committee membership and operations meantime, concluding with a wish “to reaffirm Highland Council’s commitment to public safety, equality, transparency and continuous improvement in licensing decision-making”.

In a joint statement from all seven councillors they said the motion “is about restoring and strengthening public confidence in Highland Council’s licensing system.”

They add: “Licensing exists first and foremost to protect the public. Residents and visitors alike should have confidence that licensing decisions place public protection, safeguarding and the prevention of harm at their centre.

“Recent events have understandably prompted questions about how licensing decisions are made, the consistency of decision-making and whether existing arrangements remain fit for purpose.

“This is not about relitigating previous cases and it is not about reaching predetermined conclusions. It is about asking reasonable questions, identifying lessons, sharing good practice and ensuring public confidence in one of the council’s most important regulatory functions.”

Highland Council will vote on whether to not to agree the motion at the meeting next week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 12, 2026 4:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 19277
Quote:
It could also look at “whether there are lessons to be learned regarding equality, unconscious bias, organisational culture or other factors that could potentially influence decision making.”

If it's to be a thorough and unbiased review then I don't think they want to go there :-s

Particularly the 'unconscious bias' thing :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 12, 2026 5:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 19277
This is the full motion here.

Certainly plenty of fine words :-o

(The numbering seems to be a bit odd at one point (literally a rogue odd number...), but it's as per the council document.)


Public Safety, Licensing Decision-Making and an Independent Review


Council notes:

1. The significant public interest generated by the Highland Licensing Committee's
decision of 23 June 2026 in relation to the taxi operator licences held by David
Brown and the subsequent referral of that decision for reconsideration.

2. That discussion arising from the decision has extended beyond the circumstances
of a single case and has prompted wider debate regarding public confidence in
the Council's licensing processes, particularly in relation to public safety,
safeguarding, transparency and the application of the statutory "fit and proper
person" test.

3. That licensing is fundamentally a public protection function and that public
confidence is strengthened when licensing decisions are seen to place safety,
safeguarding and the prevention of harm at their centre

4. That a number of questions have been raised by elected members and members
of the public regarding:

    • consistency of decision-making;
    • the weight attached to Police Scotland objections and public protection
    information;
    • the treatment of offences involving violence against women and girls;
    • the application of the fit and proper person test;
    • the balance between transparency and confidentiality in licensing
    proceedings;
    • the nature and extent of information available to members in cases involving
    ongoing criminal proceedings, including sub judice considerations; and
    wider public confidence in licensing outcomes.

5. That Highland Council has responsibilities under the Equality Act 2010 and has
publicly committed itself to promoting equality, challenging discrimination and
advancing the safety and wellbeing of all communities.

1. That understanding how different groups experience licensing services, including
women and girls, can help inform effective policy and decision-making.


Council believes:

1. That public confidence is enhanced where licensing decisions are demonstrably
fair, transparent, consistent and grounded in public protection.

2. That residents and visitors should be able to use licensed services and premises
with confidence that safeguarding considerations are being given appropriate
weight.

3.That where questions have arisen regarding decision-making processes,
governance arrangements, organisational culture or the consideration of equality
and safeguarding issues, it is beneficial for these matters to be examined
independently and objectively.

4. That an independent review would provide an opportunity to identify lessons,
share good practice, strengthen public confidence and support elected members
in carrying out their licensing responsibilities.


Council therefore agrees:

1. To commission an independent external review of Highland Council licensing.

2. That the review should be led by a suitably qualified individual independent of
Highland Council and that, where appropriate, the review will engage with
individuals, organisations or professional bodies with relevant expertise in:

    • licensing law;
    • public protection and safeguarding;
    • violence against women and girls;
    • equality and human rights; and
    • governance and ethical decision-making.

3. That the review may wish to consider:

    • the operation of the Highland Licensing Committee;
    • arrangements relating to the appointment of the Chair of Licensing,
    • recognising the Committee's quasi-judicial role;
    • the adequacy of governance, advice and support arrangements available to
    • members in supporting lawful, consistent and evidence-based decision
    making;
    • consistency in the application of the fit and proper person test;
    • the treatment of Police Scotland objections and public protection evidence;
    • decision-making in cases involving violence, sexual offending, domestic
    abuse and safeguarding concerns;
    • the extent to which issues relating to women's safety and lived experience
    are reflected in licensing decision-making;
    • whether there are lessons to be learned regarding equality, unconscious
    bias, organisational culture or other factors that could potentially influence
    decision making;
    • the adequacy of member training and support;
    • decision-making culture, governance arrangements and accountability
    mechanisms; and
    • opportunities to strengthen public confidence, transparency and public
    understanding of licensing decisions.

4. That the review should, where appropriate, engage with elected members, Council
officers, Police Scotland, licensing professionals, equality organisations, women's
organisations and other relevant stakeholders.

5. That the Chief Executive is requested to bring forward to the next meeting of the
Council detailed proposals for commissioning the review, including proposed
governance arrangements, terms of reference, resource implications and
estimated costs, for consideration and approval by Council.

6. That subject to approval as described at para 5 above, the Review Chair will be
appointed and review initiated by the end of December 2026.

7. That an interim report will be presented to Highland Council by 31 March 2027,
setting out progress to date, any emerging themes or findings, and the Review
Chair's proposed timetable for completion of the review, including arrangements
for the presentation of any final report and recommendations to Council.

8. That the review does not prevent the Council from instigating interim changes to
the operation and membership of the Licencing Committee pending the final
report and recommendations.

9. To reaffirm Highland Council's commitment to public safety, equality, transparency
and continuous improvement in licensing decision-making.


Signed:
Mrs J Hendry
Mrs K MacLean
Mrs E Knox
Ms S Atkin
Ms L Johnston
Mrs M Reid
Mrs K Willis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 12, 2026 5:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 19277
Quote:
3. That the review may wish to consider:

• recognising the Committee's quasi-judicial role

:lol: :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 12, 2026 7:15 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57907
Location: 1066 Country
If those licensing councillors want a licensing review, why don't they get the licensing committee to agree to one?

It happens in dozens of councils each year, and none of them make a song and dance about it.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 13, 2026 12:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 19277
Quote:
Signed:

Mrs E Knox

Good job these people are such fine upstanding citizens. This is from 2015 :-o


Former Highland fiscal set to contest council seat in by-election

https://www.ross-shirejournal.co.uk/new ... on-156884/

A FORMER Highland procurator fiscal who lost her job after a devastating accident is set to contest a council by-election as an SNP candidate.

Emma Knox has been chosen by the party to compete in next month’s by-election to replace Drew Henry as SNP councillor for Aird and Loch Ness.

Ms Knox was among three candidates vying for selection to stand in the forthcoming poll, sparked by Drew Hendry’s elevation to Westminster.

The mother of two who suffered serious skull, neck and rib fractures plus brain and nerve damage, after a car crash on the A862 Inverness to Beauly road days before Christmas in 2012, was so badly injured she spent months learning to walk again.

The driver of the oncoming van was left with a broken neck but has since recovered.

Ms Knox was banned from driving for two years and was sacked from her job as a senior fiscal in Inverness after being convicted of dangerous driving, but won her case for unfair dismissal.

Ms Knox said she has been involved in SNP politics for some time since recovering from her accident and recently helped in the Yes campaign and the 2015 General Election campaign.

Also vying for selection were Bill Boyd, who unsuccessfully contested the Inverness South council seat in 2012, and 20-year-old Invernessian Matthew Friess.

She said: “I am delighted to have been selected by my fellow SNP members in Aird & Loch Ness to stand as their candidate in the up and coming by-election.

"Thank you to all the SNP members who voted for me. I enjoyed a great camaraderie with the other nominees, Matt and Bill, and I loved meeting members across the ward during the SNP candidate election process.

"Now the work continues to persuade the residents of Aird and Loch Ness that I am the best person to represent their needs and aspirations on the Highland Council.

"After my serious car accident, I decided I wanted to spend my time helping others and having spent the last 18 months working with young adults with learning disabilities at Cantraybridge College, I decided to stand for Council so that I can use my skills and life experience to help the people in my local communities reach their potential and make their lives better.”

Leader of the SNP Group in Highland Council, Maxine Smith (Cromarty Firtth) said she was impressed by Ms Knox’s determination to move forward with life and not sit back and become depressed about what happened.

She added: “Emma has received so much bad press over the bad accident that she was involved in and yet it devastated her life, causing severe and lasting physical disabilities, as well as the mental damage of coming to terms with the harm she had done to others.

"Not only did Emma almost lose her own life, but she lost the job she adored. She has had to rebuild her life and try to move forward, learning from this tragic mistake.

“In the SNP, we believe people deserve a second chance if they have truly tried to make amends. Emma realises she did wrong, she admitted this and is still suffering the consequences of that disastrous day a few weeks before Christmas three years ago, both physically and mentally.

"We should allow her to use her many talents to help others and this is exactly what she would do if she became a Highland Councillor.”

A by-election to elect a councillor to serve the Aird and Loch Ness (Ward 13) will be held on October 8.

Nominations will close at 4pm on Monday, 7 September 2015 and unless the by-election is uncontested, voting will take place on Thursday, 8 October.

The count will take place the following day in the Phipps Hall, Beauly at 10am.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 13, 2026 8:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 19277
For balance, this is the other side of the story.

And an interesting scenario in terms of parallels with taxi licensing, and in particular because she's now a licensing councillor. I mean, it's primarily about a driving offence, and stuff about a civil process and proportionality etc :-o

Lots more that could be said...

(And, to be fair, although I don't know the legal ins and outs, I'm surprised her offence was dangerous rather than careless driving...)


Belief in Justice: Emma Knox’s story

https://www.fda.org.uk/news/emma-knox/

Katie Lazell talks to former Inverness District Procurator Fiscal Emma Knox about how the FDA helped her through a life-changing event.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Sussex and 597 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group