Taxi Driver Online :: View topic

what the bloody hell is thaty? :shock:

dose anyone no the outcome of the appeal.
please?

And you boys moan about limos :lol:

I,ll get me coat.

http://www.theargus.co.uk/display.var.1263959.0.tuktuk_company_has_fine_reduced.php

Frances Burton, chair of the tribunal, commented in her ruling: "We are however concerned at the conduct of the public inquiry which permitted party status to known hostile competition to both the concept and the actual operation of the Appellant's company's service, namely the taxi company lobby."

Sussex wrote:

I don't think the size of the fine really matters, what does matter is that this outfit has one black mark against its name in respect of not keeping to timetables. The traffic commissioner won't allow many more incidents of this nature before it revokes the operators license.

Regards

JD

Author:	Guest [ Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:45 pm ]
Post subject:	tuks tuks again
looks like they are comingg back to brighton after there little holiday. but this time they are looking to run a flexi bus service. what the bloody hell is thaty?

Author:	GMB Branch secretary [ Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:20 pm ]
Post subject:
Do you have any specific info on this????????????????????????? ORGANISE AGITATE EDUCATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Author:	Sussex [ Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:12 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: tuks tuks again
Cgull wrote: what the bloody hell is thaty? Well thaty (:D ) Mr Cgull is; http://www.vosa.gov.uk/vosacorp/flexibl ... nsnote.htm The rules and regs are very complicated, but can be found in detail on this link. Fifth item down. http://www.vosa.gov.uk/vosacorp/publica ... guides.htm

Author:	Guest [ Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:00 pm ]
Post subject:
dose anyone no the outcome of the appeal. please?

Author:	Downtown Cab [ Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:31 pm ]
Post subject:
Has anyone heard yet?

Taxi Driver Online http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

tuks tuks again http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5573	Page 1 of 2

Author:	Blue Nose [ Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:17 pm ]
Post subject:
Tuk Tuks have applied to run as taxis in the great city of Birmingham. Help !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Author:	MR T [ Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:04 pm ]
Post subject:
The great city of Birmingham

Author:	Guest [ Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:19 pm ]
Post subject:
Cgull wrote: dose anyone no the outcome of the appeal. please? it was due today. any news pleaees.

Author:	Blue Nose [ Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:07 pm ]
Post subject:
Spoke to my licensing official last week and they have applied to run 5/6-seater wheel-chair acceptable tuk tuks. Has anyone seen one?

Author:	Sussex [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 7:35 pm ]
Post subject:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/sussex/6455717.stm

Author:	Graduate [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:19 pm ]
Post subject:
And you boys moan about limos I,ll get me coat.

Author:	Sussex [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:34 pm ]
Post subject:
Graduate wrote: And you boys moan about limos I,ll get me coat. To a degree the Tuk Tuk are now trying to run a service not that far from the type of service the 16 seater limos are. But I've got a funny feeling in my blood that the B&H taxi/PH trade wont let them succeed.

Author:	Sussex [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 9:02 pm ]
Post subject:
http://www.theargus.co.uk/display.var.1 ... educed.php Frances Burton, chair of the tribunal, commented in her ruling: "We are however concerned at the conduct of the public inquiry which permitted party status to known hostile competition to both the concept and the actual operation of the Appellant's company's service, namely the taxi company lobby."

Author:	JD [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 9:36 pm ]
Post subject:
Sussex wrote: http://www.theargus.co.uk/display.var.1263959.0.tuktuk_company_has_fine_reduced.php Frances Burton, chair of the tribunal, commented in her ruling: "We are however concerned at the conduct of the public inquiry which permitted party status to known hostile competition to both the concept and the actual operation of the Appellant's company's service, namely the taxi company lobby." I don't think the size of the fine really matters, what does matter is that this outfit has one black mark against its name in respect of not keeping to timetables. The traffic commissioner won't allow many more incidents of this nature before it revokes the operators license. Regards JD

Page 1 of 2	All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	brightonbreezy [ Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:28 pm ]
Post subject:
JD wrote: Sussex wrote: http://www.theargus.co.uk/display.var.1263959.0.tuktuk_company_has_fine_reduced.php Frances Burton, chair of the tribunal, commented in her ruling: "We are however concerned at the conduct of the public inquiry which permitted party status to known hostile competition to both the concept and the actual operation of the Appellant's company's service, namely the taxi company lobby." I don't think the size of the fine really matters, what does matter is that this outfit has one black mark against its name in respect of not keeping to timetables. The traffic commissioner won't allow many more incidents of this nature before it revokes the operators license. Regards JD When this mob return down here they will be running on Flexi-bus licences and they won't have to stick to time tables. :sad ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Join The GMB - PH Driver Representation