Well done JD. We're on the threshold. You've put us there.
Congrats.
| Taxi Driver Online http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| The shadow knocks out the boxer - victory over CEC http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5836 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | jasbar [ Sat Mar 24, 2007 1:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | The shadow knocks out the boxer - victory over CEC |
http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS ... IH_22.html |
|
| Author: | jasbar [ Sat Mar 24, 2007 1:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Well done JD. We're on the threshold. You've put us there. Congrats.
|
|
| Author: | Skull [ Sat Mar 24, 2007 1:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think a Special thanks has to go to JD and to everyone on TDO who supported us 
|
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Sat Mar 24, 2007 6:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Skull wrote: I think a Special thanks has to go to JD and to everyone on TDO who supported us
But what about those that didn't? Have you not any kind words of commiseration for them? 
|
|
| Author: | Skull [ Sat Mar 24, 2007 6:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sussex wrote: Skull wrote: I think a Special thanks has to go to JD and to everyone on TDO who supported us But what about those that didn't? Have you not any kind words of commiseration for them? Well all I can say is they are lucky this country has laws against exterminating owners who wanted us to lose
Of course this is a Joke 
|
|
| Author: | JD [ Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I understand the time limit on the appeal of this case could be three months but I'll find out tomorrow. Regards JD |
|
| Author: | NF [ Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
JD wrote: I understand the time limit on the appeal of this case could be three months but I'll find out tomorrow.
Regards JD What appeal?? My understanding is that their only course of appeal is to the House of Lords, but they can't take it there without permission from the Court of Session - and even if that is granted the House of Lords can choose whether to hear it or not. Surely the Court of Session won't entertain this, and the Lords wouldn't waste their time even if they were asked. If there is even a scrap of intelligence in CEC licensing and/or legal services then they have to realise they are at the end of the road. How much more public money are they prepared to squander? They'd be better off writing to Santa Claus.
|
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think the Lords would p*** themselves laughing if asked to hear this.
Not exactly their top priority methinks. 
|
|
| Author: | NF [ Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sussex wrote: Not exactly their top priority methinks.
Precisely. |
|
| Author: | JD [ Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
NF wrote: What appeal?? I was referring to the House of Lords but as I said I will find out tomorrow. They can apply direct to the House of lords appeals committee and they will decide whether or not the case has enough public interest to merit a Lords hearing. In England and Wales they wouldn't be given leave to appeal. In Scotland they don't need permission from the courts, so I believe. That is my understanding. You are right in everything else you say. Regards JD |
|
| Author: | JD [ Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Civil appeals An appeal lies to the House of Lords: (1) from any order or judgment of the Court of Appeal in England and Wales, with the permission of that court or, if refused, by leave of the House of Lords, subject to restrictions in respect of specific matters; (2) subject to statutory restrictions, direct from a decision of the High Court of Justice in England and Wales by leave of the House of Lords; (3) from any order or judgment of the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland, with the permission of that court or, if refused, by leave of the House of Lords, subject to restrictions in respect of specific matters; (4) subject to statutory restrictions, direct from a decision of the High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland by leave of the House of Lords, (5) from the Inner House of the Court of Session in Scotland against a judgment on the whole merits of a cause. No leave required; (6) from the Inner House of the Court of Session against an interlocutory judgment where there is a difference of opinion among the judges. No leave required; (7) from the Inner House of the Court of Session where the interlocutory judgment is one sustaining a dilatory defence and dismissing the action. No leave required; 8. from the Inner House of the Court of Session against any other interlocutory judgments (excluding those listed in (6) and (7) above) with the leave of the Inner House of the Court of Session; (9) from an interlocutor of the Court of Session granting or refusing a new trial. No leave required; (10) from an interlocutor of a Lord Ordinary after review by the Inner House of the Court of Session; (11) from judgments of the Court of Session under section 27 of the Court of Session Act 1988 relating to special cases (subject to certain restrictions); and (12) from any order or judgment of any court in Scotland from which error or appeal lay on or immediately before 1 November 1876 by common law or by statute. ______________________________--- |
|
| Author: | luke [ Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
hi brow stuff how do you guys get into all this mind bogling stuff. luke |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
luke wrote: hi brow stuff how do you guys get into all this mind bogling stuff. luke
Someone's got to.
|
|
| Author: | luke [ Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sussex wrote: luke wrote: hi brow stuff how do you guys get into all this mind bogling stuff. luke Someone's got to. glad it aint me. luke |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|