Taxi Driver Online
http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Attacked taxi driver gets speeding fine
http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5857		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  JD [ Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:25 am ]
Post subject:  Attacked taxi driver gets speeding fine
Lancashire Evening Post

March 26, 2007

HEADLINE: Attacked taxi driver gets speeding fine

A taxi driver was fined for speeding while he was being attacked in his cab by a drunken passenger.

Cabbie John Anthony was flashed by a camera doing 38mph as he sped towards his taxi base for help after the passenger started making threats and kicking John's seat.

The 40-year-old, of Westgate, Leyland, reported the terrifying incident to police - but still had to pay £85 for a speed awareness course.

The incident happened at Fox Lane, Leyland, as John, a cabbie of eight years' experience with a clean licence, desperately tried to reach the Leyland Taxi base on Hough Lane to get help. After arriving back at base he called the police, who attended and allowed the unruly passenger to walk home after a warning.

John admitted he was speeding but was advised to appeal due to the circumstances of the incident. However, officers have refused to overturn the ticket, saying the situation did not "excuse the offence".

The furious dad-of-three, who is appealing against the decision in court on April 5, said: "The passenger was threatening to bite my ear off amongst other things, so I was anxious to get to safety. "I couldn't go to the police station as it closes at night.

"What does a person have to actually endure to be let off I wonder? "How, under the circumstances, was I even to think of the speed camera - let alone slow down for it?

"I defy the person that made the decision to stand under the same pressure as I was at the time. "Police can go through speed traps in emergencies and not get fined, so why can't I?"

The incident happened in the early hours of October 8 last year. John added: "The person who threatened me was allowed to walk home after the incident as long as he didn't come back to base and cause further trouble.

"I have not only been threatened, I have paid £85 to attend a speed awareness course to avoid three penalty points. I am the one being punished." John's boss Phil Briggs added: "Personal safety must be at the top. If he felt in danger John was well within his rights to get help, even if he had to speed."

The letter, from the manager of the Lancashire Constabulary's fixed penalty department says: "Whilst I understand your situation at the time of the offence it does not excuse the offence of speeding and the notice stands." A Lancashire Constabulary spokesman said: "We can't comment further until we know the results of any court case."

John added: "I pleaded guilty originally because I'm not denying it was me. But now I am pleading guilty with mitigation because I think it is more appropriate."

The case has been slammed by motoring groups.

Director of the RAC Foundation, Edmund King, said: "One of our biggest criticisms about cameras is inflexibility. At least traffic officers could judge the situation themselves, and prosecute if they thought necessary.

"But the transition to cameras means commonsense has gone out of the window and is replaced by robotic and deflexible enforcement."

Steve Johnson, from Drive and Survive, an advanced driving organisation, commented: "I would class it as an emergency situation - he was obviously fearing for his safety."
__________________________
Author:  Sussex [ Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:53 pm ]
Post subject: 
Well I never, he has got away with it. :shock:

http://www.lep.co.uk/lancashire-news?articleid=2721071
Author:  badger [ Wed Apr 25, 2007 5:23 am ]
Post subject: 
Someone hit lucky,which is rare =D> But the best thing to do in that situation is stay cool 8) and not let the arsohole win :evil: They normally are testing you and end up backing down. Hopefully
Author:  Tulsablue [ Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:08 pm ]
Post subject: 
:shock: omg
common sense at last
Author:  Skippy71 [ Thu Apr 26, 2007 12:42 am ]
Post subject: 
If his base are anywhere near modern then there will be at least a computer data report to show that he called a "13" and his location; failing that the Op would surely remember a driver calling a "13" as they would have asked other driver to attend / called the Police and then there will be a recorded version of events.

I am sure that this was a genuine situation; however, all too often this is the easy way out - driver claims to have been under attack and wants to get three less points on his licence, and cheaper insurance next year. Unforuntaly this defence seems to back fire on those who are genuinely in need of assistance or those travelling (perhaps over the speed limit) to assist them.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/