Sussex wrote:
Yes he shouldn't have done what he did, and maybe the LO is spot on.
But there's something that makes me think he should have had another chance as it's now down to the tax payer to fund his life.
And I pay enough as it is.

I'm a firm believer in giving everyman a chance depending on what the crime is of course?
Its up to councillors to decide whether he is a fit and proper person but we shouldn't forget that we have some convicted murderers driving Taxis, so under those circumstances where does the sliding scale of justice begin and end?
Regards
JD