I explained that before asking the question - stop avoiding the point jimbo
| Taxi Driver Online http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| No Lincoln de-limit http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=570 |
Page 2 of 2 |
| Author: | TDO [ Thu Oct 20, 2005 3:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No Lincoln de-limit |
jimbo wrote: Now, now, you are just spinning the plate. Could you please explain this Jimbo? All I said is that you're clearly anti-derestriction, but at the same time you're trying to say that no one wants a plate in any case, so what's the problem and how am I spinning? Quote: You may not like it much, I really don't know why you care, unless you want a plate in Lincoln, but I am happy with the retention of the status quo. But why do you want to see de-limiting in Lincoln?
That's maybe a pertinent question in the normal restricted numbers scenario, but since you say no one wants a plate in Lincoln anyway, then surely the more relevant question is why derestriction seems to worry you so much? |
|
| Author: | jimbo [ Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: No Lincoln de-limit |
TDO wrote: jimbo wrote: Now, now, you are just spinning the plate. Could you please explain this Jimbo? All I said is that you're clearly anti-derestriction, but at the same time you're trying to say that no one wants a plate in any case, so what's the problem and how am I spinning? Quote: You may not like it much, I really don't know why you care, unless you want a plate in Lincoln, but I am happy with the retention of the status quo. But why do you want to see de-limiting in Lincoln? That's maybe a pertinent question in the normal restricted numbers scenario, but since you say no one wants a plate in Lincoln anyway, then surely the more relevant question is why derestriction seems to worry you so much? Why do you answer a question with a question? |
|
| Author: | TDO [ Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I explained that before asking the question - stop avoiding the point jimbo
|
|
| Author: | jimbo [ Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
TDO wrote: I explained that before asking the question - stop avoiding the point jimbo
What is the point? |
|
| Author: | jimbo [ Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
jimbo wrote: TDO wrote: I explained that before asking the question - stop avoiding the point jimbo What is the point? You say why not de-restrict, if no one wants a plate, I say why deristict if no one wants a plate. Shall we organise centenary celebrations for the London 25 Feet turning circle next year? Or will you continue with your myth, rather than reality? |
|
| Author: | TDO [ Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
jimbo wrote: You say why not de-restrict, if no one wants a plate, I say why deristict if no one wants a plate. But why bother opposing it if no one wants a plate anyway? The answer is clearly that there are people who want a plate, but you don't want us to know that  Quote: Shall we organise centenary celebrations for the London 25 Feet turning circle next year?
Or will you continue with your myth, rather than reality? Why bring that into it? I can't remember the last time I even mentioned the turning circle 
|
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
jimbo wrote: I say why deristict if no one wants a plate.
I would say a £15/20/30,000 survey every three years is reason enough. 
|
|
| Author: | jimbo [ Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sussex wrote: jimbo wrote: I say why deristict if no one wants a plate. I would say a £15/20/30,000 survey every three years is reason enough. Survey carried out 12 months ago. we may as well get our money's worth out of it. |
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|