TDO wrote:
Gateshead Angel wrote:
You, TDO, have isolated a word within a post, then mis-quoted the author way out of contect by not quoting what preceeded or followed the use of the word.
Of course the word was isolated, because it was the use of this paricular word that was being questioned.
If I was quoting out of context, then why not point out how this was.
The answer is that I wasn't - you used the word free in a particular sense, and then when others used the same word in the same sense, you said that they weren't being accurate - pots, kettles and black, and that kind of thing.
Hey TDO, your having a laugh.
You state that plates are issued free by the council but holders demand premiums up to £70k for them.
You don't however explain that the majority of current plateholders didn't obtain the plate for free from the local authority but had to pay the previous holder of the plate for the rights to it, in turn the previous holder had to pay for it and in most cases you have to go back through many holders before you actually get to the first holder who obtained the licence free from the council.
The termanology used suggest that every one of the current plateholders got their plate for free, and that quite simply isn't true.
JD is being accurate in his figures why can't the report be accurate in its explaination or summary.
Could it be because it weakens your argument
B. Lucky
![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)