Sussex wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Sussex you have behaved on this thread not only like a very bad loser, but rather like those scare story merchants that you once so powerfully downed with phases like "cost of surveys will double" what crap you will soon find the surveys are a thing of the past, at least the surveys you mean, if OFT did one thing they killed Halcrow Fox.
No local authorities will have to provide a batch of statistics on Governmental forms and publish thier intent in the local transport plans.
Where it says authorities will adhere to best practice, it means authorities will be shown as a shining example to others.
That's not very nice, I thought I have been very contrite.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/wink.gif)
I disagree with the fact that Halcrow have been killed off. Someone has to survey, to get the figures. They must be independent, thus the council can't do it.
Now the likes of Halcrow wont be able to just count the heads at ranks. They pretend to use assess latent demand by customer surveys, but they never use that data to assess SUD. Now they will have to.
Yes 'best practice' could be a good thing, but it will still need to be assessed.
no I believe OFT destroyed the Halcrow machine, the forms of survey, police reports on town dispersion can be used, and only a single judge ever said the reports be independent.
however halcrow are not idependent they are paid by the council (from drivers funds but that part is hidden)
you buy shares in Halcrow Sussex, but I tell you what your money could be better invested in the 3.45 at Lingfield
Geoff