Taxi Driver Online http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
how often is a hackney hailed on a typical shift of say 8hrs http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=650 |
Page 3 of 3 |
Author: | Guest [ Fri Jul 02, 2004 11:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Sussex wrote: If being a trade unionist means supporting quotas, which leads to discrimination and in-illequality. a trade unionist
Then you can stick it. ![]() Geoff shouldn't profess to being a trade unionist then give advice which is against union ethic, he again has shown clearly the he is a hypocrite. The man's word should not be trusted as he never provides a source on which his argument is based. I now have no doubt that the right decision was made when we banned him from our site, he is a serial forum abuser and a parasite on the legitimate taxi trade. I now know that anything starting with Taxib....... is something to be wary of. B. Lucky |
Author: | Guest [ Sat Jul 03, 2004 3:27 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Gateshead Angel wrote: Yorkie wrote: ok, lets get this right are you sayig trade unionists dont work? are you saying trade unionists are not disciplined? let me tell you something Mick trade unionists I know are come of the hardest working, disciplined perfectionists I know you posting is the disgrace for portraying them as something else in this case disloysal to regular customers and voting the customers down the river. in this example there was no evidence they were trade unionists at all but its good to have a demonstration of how you think Geoff mate, get a grip of yourself please, As a trade unionist yourself, your advice given to a fellow employer/parasite to get tough with his employees by "getting tough with them" contradicts union ethic. To try and "spin" the argument to your favour by misquoting, and attempting to have your personal asumptions and interpritations percieved to be the truth are a reflection of your own self serving attitude. At no time did I ever suggest that trade unionists weren't hard working or professional in thier work. Now formulate your argument using the truth, if you can, otherwise I will just ignore your lies. B. lucky you implied Mick exactly what I said you implied, you implied these people were trade unionists they were not, you implied I told an employer to get tough I did not I told an employee! nowthen pal get a grip of the facts for a change. or learn to read! |
Author: | Guest [ Sat Jul 03, 2004 3:33 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Anonymous wrote: Sussex wrote: If being a trade unionist means supporting quotas, which leads to discrimination and in-illequality. a trade unionistThen you can stick it. ![]() Geoff shouldn't profess to being a trade unionist then give advice which is against union ethic, he again has shown clearly the he is a hypocrite. The man's word should not be trusted as he never provides a source on which his argument is based. I now have no doubt that the right decision was made when we banned him from our site, he is a serial forum abuser and a parasite on the legitimate taxi trade. I now know that anything starting with Taxib....... is something to be wary of. B. Lucky we must have given you on various forums 1000s of sources and I have e-mails here sent privatly to proove it but publicaly as well. you have said you aint the time to read it and anyway, you argue the law should be changed. never has such been wasted on anyone but you, so Mick matey you are on your own, because if you cannot spare the time neither can I. |
Page 3 of 3 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |