Taxi Driver Online • View topic - Edinburgh, Jacobs report

Board index » General » Restricted taxi numbers

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Edinburgh, Jacobs report

Page 25 of 34

[ 504 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 34 Next

Print view

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

Sirius

Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:29 pm

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:03 pm
Posts: 280

Anyway on with thread, why does everyone keep saying that the plates do not belong to the person who paid for it, surely they are intangibles and are therefore part of the business.

Top

TDO

Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:33 pm

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet

Sirius wrote:

This could all be ended once and for all, why all the secrecy and confusion, it seems to have caused more speculation and upset than is normal.

That's a bit rich coming from someone who's clearly intent on stirring things.

The only confusion I've seen over the last few days is from the people who don't like an opposing argument about the trade being put forward for once.

I would get used to it

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

Top

TDO

Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:37 pm

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet

Sirius wrote:

Well for something so contentious, why dont you identify yourselves, that would bring it to an end, everyone would then know there is nothing in the claims made by others.

Why don't you ask them for evidence?

The fact is that they can think of nothing better to say.

Another thing, one of them threatened to go round and have a word with the solicitor (that was when he was in hospital) that's the one that brags about keeping a truncheon in his boot.

Maybe that's why you stay anon as well, just in case you fall out with them [-o<

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

Top

TDO

Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:41 pm

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet

Sirius wrote:

Anyway on with thread, why does everyone keep saying that the plates do not belong to the person who paid for it, surely they are intangibles and are therefore part of the business.

I'm not sure if anyone has actually said that the plates don't belong to the person who paid for it?

But, anyway, as Sir Christopher Bellamy said in the Wirral case, the license is still there, even after derestriction, the thing that is lost is the premium, which is attributable solely to the policy of the council at any particular point in time.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

Top

Sussex

Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:42 pm

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54423
Location: 1066 Country

Sirius wrote:

Steady on Sussex, It was just an idea :roll:

It's a great idea and I look forward to you reporting back what TDO's so-called owner has to say.

I will give you a reminder tomorrow if you wish. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH

Top

Sirius

Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:53 pm

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:03 pm
Posts: 280

TDO wrote:

Sirius wrote:

This could all be ended once and for all, why all the secrecy and confusion, it seems to have caused more speculation and upset than is normal.

I will just not bother then, theres no point in it.

Top

TDO

Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:57 pm

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet

No point in what?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

Top

187ums

Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:32 pm

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 7:33 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: City of dreaming spires

exactly! you have gone for the lowest common denominator.

Top

Realcabforceforum

Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:36 pm

Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:25 pm
Posts: 230

TDO wrote:

Sirius wrote:

This could all be ended once and for all, why all the secrecy and confusion, it seems to have caused more speculation and upset than is normal.

He has been stirring it,

"people don't like an opposinging argument?"

Your an absoulute star "tdo",maybe we as in "edinburgh" do not like the lies you spout from this site, indeed, today your cohort spouts more rubbish, he has undoubtly spent hours trying to pick holes in the jacob survey, but to what end? the FACT of the matter is that "jacobs" fullfilled their contract with "cec", they worked to the criteria they were given and supplied the results, so whats the problem, wrong results for you? Give it a go,TAKE THEM TO COURT? , but YOU won't will you :lol:

: "put up or shut up" springs to mind, so, I beg to differ, "sirius" is not the stirrer, YOU are!

As for anyone not likeing an opposing argument, Do we really look like we are here to make friends with you wannabee cabbies :lol:

_________________
Who's been "Editing" my mailbox then ...lol

Top

Realcabforceforum

Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:44 pm

Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:25 pm
Posts: 230

Sussex wrote:

Sirius wrote:

Well for something so contentious, why dont you identify yourselves, that would bring it to an end, everyone would then know there is nothing in the claims made by others.

I couldn't give a f*** if you believe me or not.

But this is the chap that the liars says owns and runs TDO:

Mr David Spencer from Davies Arnold Cooper 60, Fountain St Manchester M2 2FE : 0161 839 8396

Give him a ring and ask him, then come back and tell us what he said. :lol:

We just did, and he confirms we don't like it up us, but YOU do :wink:

is he a CLOSE pal of yours?

_________________
Who's been "Editing" my mailbox then ...lol

Top

187ums

Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:45 pm

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 7:33 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: City of dreaming spires

basically JD you needed to read the report just a little bit further and you might not have taken it all out of context.

Top

ALI T

Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:49 pm

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh

187ums wrote:

basically JD you needed to read the report just a little bit further and you might not have taken it all out of context.

why dont you explain it for us??

Top

ALI T

Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:51 pm

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh

Quote:

We just did, and he confirms we don't like it up us, but YOU do Wink is he a CLOSE pal of yours?

the quality of youre posts are begining to get better realcabforceforum

Top

Realcabforceforum

Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:54 pm

Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:25 pm
Posts: 230

ALI T wrote:

187ums wrote:

basically JD you needed to read the report just a little bit further and you might not have taken it all out of context.

why dont you explain it for us??

Because he doesn't have an axe to grinde, he like us knows that its just a small part of the bigger picture, and he knows like us that he doesn't have too :lol:

simply put, yer f.u.c.k.e.d, if your whole argument is based on discrediting "jacobs" then your "cream crackered" :lol:

_________________
Who's been "Editing" my mailbox then ...lol

Top

ALI T

Post subject:

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:56 pm

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh

please explain oh wise one

Top

Page 25 of 34

[ 504 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 34 Next

Board index » General » Restricted taxi numbers

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum