Taxi Driver Online

more likely he cant explain it dont you think???

It's a biscuit you put cheese on, "jacobs cream crackers"

_________________
Who's been "Editing" my mailbox then ...lol

what rubbish and the word is not trying but succeeded

you think its all about fullfilling a contract you just havent a clue m8


i dont believe you have any so perhaps here is a good place to start

do you have anythingvalid to say realcabforceforum or are you just going to subject us to more of youre boyish pish
if this is this best you can do then perhaps jasbars right you need to be ignored

One will wait with great anticipation, and "We" will be there

As for your "friends" snipe, well Lets just say I'd rather have "none" than yours!

_________________
Who's been "Editing" my mailbox then ...lol

Try giving it a go I doubt you can though, "jasbar" theres another name from the archives

_________________
Who's been "Editing" my mailbox then ...lol

try giving what a go

So what's your excuse for evading the question this time? Is it the fact that you have to eat humble pie or is it because you don't have the intelligence to understand the contents of the Jacobs report?

You say you have read section 5.6 of the report but having read it you haven't a clue what it means. You are that confused with the contents that you made a complete fool of yourself by confusing 53,000 passenger trips with vehicle trips. It's a good job you stopped digging a hole for yourself because it would have made you look an even bigger clown than you have so far demonstrated.

JD

Calm down old man Just because he doesn't believe your lies, there is no need for name calling, having said that, it is always a clear sign someone is getting closer to the truth when you start getting nasty.

_________________
Who's been "Editing" my mailbox then ...lol

going by youre own logic and the fact that youre posts are hardly polite or constructive, doesnt that mean we must be very close to the truth ????

Funny, I've been thinking that about you for weeks

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

Now let me see, are you not the dogmatist who said this:



And then after being shown the error of your ways you said this:



It seems you were converted from dogmatist to a gentile in one easy lesson. It now appears you are back to being a dogmatist? Perhaps the humble pie you ate on that occasion was not to your liking.

Seeing as how you agree with Mr 187ums perhaps you can answer the questions which he wouldn't? I take it you have read the Jacobs report?

Knowing your dislike for the truth perhaps you can go one step further than Mr 187ums and juggle the flaws in the Jacobs report to fit in with your version of the facts. When you have done that I shall serve you up another helping of your favourite humble pie.

My money is on you evading the questions because you’re the type of person who can't stand to be proven wrong. In fact, in that respect you bear a remarkable resemblance to Mister Gateshead Angel, just like you he has habit of not digesting the facts, and also like you he frequently loses his composure when forced to eat humble pie. I can see he has bequeathed his belligerence to you, then again, perhaps you are he?

Regards

JD

My favourite quote from Jacobs. Taxis in Edinburgh do 12 jobs in 24 hours

I've only ever driven a taxi, so I'm not sure what you mean by 'wannabee'.

As for Jacobs, all these reports are nonsense, that's why they won't answer any searching questions that are asked about them. I had to laugh at Nigel saying that Jacobs had given JD the cold shoulder - that's one way of putting it

I've barely looked at the Edinburgh report, but since the methodology employed is the normal one, there's not really much point. But given the fact that the holes picked in the minutiae by others has elicited little in the way of response, either from yourselves or Jacobs, then there's clearly more holes in it than the Meadowbank Thistle defence (what happened to them again?)

Perhaps you could answer a fundamental question of the type that totally discredits Jacobs, Halcrow et al.

If it was concluded that an identified SUD meant that supply had to be increased by 5%, and the released 63 new plates (ie 1,260 x 5%), how much would supply actually increase?

I'll give you a clue - it's a lot less than 5%.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

You may want to go back and check this rubbish over and start again if you want to have a go at me, I can see now how the "jacobs" report was to much for you

_________________
Who's been "Editing" my mailbox then ...lol

I suppose I should be flattered you have been thinking of me for weeks, your a STRANGE person indeed

_________________
Who's been "Editing" my mailbox then ...lol