Taxi Driver Online

yes i made that up though i find it hard as does everyone else to tell the differance between it and youre posts

It didn't take much reading did it? Then again, for the money Edinburgh council paid for the survey you can't really expect much. A few video cameras, a few phone calls, the occasional item of out of date information from DfT stats and few stats of their own that don't add up. One report, twenty grand profit, no wonder Jacobs are shy about answering questions.

Back to Mr 187ums, how about you answer the questions that he couldn't answer seeing as how stuck your oar in? Aren't you an expert on the Jacobs report? You still agree with Jacobs that each cab does 12 jobs on a Friday and 12 on a Saturday?

Earlier I referred to the fact that you have a remarkable resemblence to a character named Gateshead Angel, If you aren't him you sure are a card board cutout of the original.

Do you think we might get an answer to the Jacobs question before the weeks out or is it too difficult for you?

Regards

JD

Well,at least now you are quoting the right poster, that last post you made was so YOU, a few details, attribute them to whoever suits your cause and off you go trying to make others beleive your lies, its not big you know

187ums is big enough to answer on his own thank you very much, my "oar" as you put it was more about your poor attempt to bully him.

And as for the "gateshead angel" comment, I can be anyone you want me to be bigboy

At the end of the day, I don't think jacobs has much to worry about from this forum or it's posters, stop bleating about it and challenge it if you think it's flawed, somehow I don't think that will happen

_________________
Who's been "Editing" my mailbox then ...lol

For someone who tries to be so precise and criticises others who may err from time to time, you shock me by wrongly attributing 2 of the above quotes to the wrong person. I am also dismayed to note that when your errors were pointed out, you still failed to note them, correct them or even acknowledge them!!

The lack of accuracy in this post casts doubt on the accuracy of your other research findings, does it not? Or are you not man enough to admit your failings?

I am neither dogmatist nor gentile and like many others, I believe in my right to hold my opinion but unlike you, I will not try to force it on others.
But then you are never wrong, are you? - unlike us lesser mortals who admit when they err.

You fond of the word "lies" are you?

In respect of the realcabforce business, it may have escaped your attention but I don't discriminate between the two of you. I don't know which is the original and which is the copy, or who is trying to mimic whom? The only thing I know is that whoever is behind these nicks are not averse to replying on each other's behalf. Would you like an example? So if there is more than one realcabforce then they are rather silly to mimic each other. Most people on here associate a connection between the two nicks therefore you can hardly blame them for not really giving a chit who replies to their post.



If 187ums felt he was being bullied he has my heartfelt sympathies, it was very noble of you to come to his aid. I suspect you contemplated inviting 187ums over to your place to eat some humble pie? Perhaps humble pie is not to his liking and that is why he wouldn't answer the questions I put to him. As a matter of fact I don't see you answering the questions either. I can't say I'm surprised because you never were amenable to facts.

I notice you have a fetish about Jacobs and me, I must admit I'm highly flattered. Do you have available any additional facts that I might use in my report? Do you think I should mention the cockup they made in the Liverpool report or should I keep that under the table? If you send me any useful information I could always put joint names on the report, yours and mine? Then again, I might just put your name on it and let you take all the credit. lol



Oh you do have a remarkable resemblance, don't tell me you haven't crossed the road and spoken to Gateshead Angel? If you haven't you must try it sometime, I can just imagine how the conversation would go.

You will notice I didn't raise my voice to you? That is because I find you entertaining, I noticed in a previous thread you had some harsh words to say to some of our colleagues from Scotland, I do hope that is not typical of you? No matter which real cabforce you are?

I have just one observation to make, I wish I could say I live by my results but alas my track record is not very good. Up to now I have only had a hand in 48 councils lifting numbers and by my standards thats a little dissapointing. However I did have a hand in the latest developements in Oldham so perhaps Edinburgh is not as impregnable as you think?

Never under estimate those who walk in silence.

Regards

JD

Indeed, they could be ghosts, and its a well known fact ghosts never pay the fare.

If you care to point out my inaccuracies I will gladly review them and give you my response. I can't be any fairer than that.

Now are you going to answer any of the questions?

Regards

JD

But they always pay the ferryman. lol

Regards

JD

How weak is this reply, and an admission on the intensions of the stupids, theres one thing for sure, your ego far outstrips your talent, and again, challenge the report if you think your interpretation is correct, somehow I think that won't happen

_________________
Who's been "Editing" my mailbox then ...lol

Like it or not, there are two different people using 2 similar but different nicks, yet you CHOOSE to confuse them for some reason (probably because they disagree with your opinions). It has been pointed out to you (twice now) that you have erred, yet you still fail to even acknowledge this.

As I said, doubts are now cast over the accuracy of your research and findings, when you make basic errors in identifying the authors of posts and then subsequently refuse to admit to them.

I must be really getting to you Mr realcabforce?

First let me reiterate, I treat both nicks as one, always have done and I always will do. If there are two separate individuals behind these nicks then I will advise one to change it as soon as possible. Until they do they will not be taken seriously.

I can assure you that most people on this forum like to know who they are talking to and having two more or less identical nicks does not endear them to the characters behind the nicks. If you and the other person think you are being smart by having similar nicks then I'm afraid the idea has backfired on you.

I suggest you both grow up and cast off your Jekyll and Hyde persona and enter the world of reality.

Regards

JD

And that sums you up nicely doesn't it?

Your way or no way!!!!

So, you have taken to speaking for most people on here, how wonderful, it's a shame you are wrong yet again, ego over talent perhaps

_________________
Who's been "Editing" my mailbox then ...lol

Yes I think most people are disenchanted that we have two similar sounding nicks and they can't disseminate between the two at times. Especially when on occasions one nick substitutes a reply for the other.

I know TDO has mentioned it and I've had several inquiries to have one of the nicks banned because they are so confusing.

So you can see the problem you have created. I'm not saying you are not a reasonable person but you might consider changing your nick or at least asking your friend to change his. It would be so much easier for us all.

Regards

JD

My final words on this matter.
You have just written the biggest load of bullshit I've seen and proved your ignorance of this subject. Talked to the author - don't make me laugh.

The database is NOT encrypted. The mod, to which I refer, has been used and tested quite extensively and allows for deletion, reading and archiving of PMs. Your forum (which has lain unused since mid-July) can hardly be relied on as evidence of your "skills" You use a company that does everything for you, you get Jim Taylor to write the words, so what do you actually do?

I have discussed this with several people who actually run busy forums and they use this primarily to keep file sizes down by deleting old PMs (they can and do check them on occasions)

As for other snide remarks made about this, Let it be known quite clearly that I never said this was an integral part of the forum, I did say it "was a straightforward matter for anyone with administrator privileges on this forum to read PMs."

It requires no knowledge of programming, it is freely available and IT COULD BE INSTALLED ON THIS FORUM IF TDO DECIDED TO DO IT. I have never said it is, all I have done is correct an erroneous statement and if members are finding PMs going astray people can only draw their own conclusions from what is available to them. TDO deny any knowledge of this facility BUT it exists.

What you believe is up to you!!!