Taxi Driver Online
http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Surveys
http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2401		 Page 5 of 5
Author:  Sussex [ Thu Aug 25, 2005 2:14 pm ]
Post subject: 
Realcabforceforum wrote:
There are times "sussex" when you can be so hurtful :cry: :cry:

I much prefer truthful. :wink:
Author:  Realcabforceforum [ Fri Aug 26, 2005 2:03 pm ]
Post subject: 
Sussex wrote:
Realcabforceforum wrote:
There are times "sussex" when you can be so hurtful :cry: :cry:

I much prefer truthful. :wink:


Try giving it a go then :wink:
Author:  Skull [ Mon Aug 29, 2005 4:44 pm ]
Post subject: 
Realcabforceforum wrote:
Sussex wrote:
Realcabforceforum wrote:
There are times "sussex" when you can be so hurtful :cry: :cry:

I much prefer truthful. :wink:


Try giving it a go then :wink:



Your wasting your time with him sussex one brain cell tripping over the other.

:twisted:
Author:  JD [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:47 pm ]
Post subject: 
In a recent licensing report to committee regarding their recent survey the LO decided to question the legal reasoning of the survey company TPI in suggesting the survey had a shelf life of 3 years. I'm afraid TPI were miserably found wanting.

1 PURPOSE OF REPORT

1.1 The purpose of this report is to inform the members of the findings of the ???? City Council, Hackney Carriage demand Study. The objectives of the study were to:

? Determine whether or not there exists a significant unmet demand for Hackney Carriage services in ???;

? Determine the number of licences required to meet any unmet demand in ????;

? Determine how, if at all, present quantity controls benefit consumers in the City, by establishing the effect of the controls on taxi availability, waiting times and consumers’ choice and safety;

? Identify what, if any, special circumstances in ????, justify the retention of quantity controls;

?State the expected lifetime of the survey and provide sound evidence to support this.

When questioned about their reasons for believing the survey had a shelf life of three years TPI could not provide any evidence to support their statement. This prompted the Licensing officer to write the following details in his report to committee.

5.5 The author of the report concludes (paragraph 11.5) that the anticipated useful life of the survey is 3 years but provides no evidence to support this.

Regards

JD
Author:  Sussex [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 6:32 pm ]
Post subject: 
JD wrote:
In a recent licensing report to committee regarding their recent survey the LO decided to question the legal reasoning of the survey company TPI in suggesting the survey had a shelf life of 3 years. I'm afraid TPI were miserably found wanting.

I would have loved to seen the faces of the survey folk when that question came to them from ??????? council. :D

But it does sum up the survey process, flawed. :shock:
Author:  Guest [ Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:19 pm ]
Post subject: 
our survey down here had a time limit of 3 years.
which mean we are having another one next year.
another 20 grand for adding a few numbers up. [-(
Page 5 of 5 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/