RealCabforce wrote:
Who the f u c k does JD think he is? What right does he have to criticise the Jacob's report for making suppositions and basing findings on errors, when his methodology is highly suspect and uses his own suppositions.
You are quite at liberty to point out any errors I have made? The difference between Jacobs and myself is that I pursue the facts and they pursue the agenda of Edinburgh council.
I think there is one thing you should know about this website before we go any further and that is, TDO has always pursued the "Facts and the Truth" no matter who gets injured along the way and what's more it always will do. We do not devote countless hours of our time and resources just to pat the trade on the back and say well done keep up the good work. If we feel the truth and facts are being buried or misrepresented then TDO will always endeavour to make sure the facts are known.
TDO makes no apology for highlighting discrepancies in survey reports, this website holds the belief along with the OFT and many others that surveys are flawed and are nearly always manipulated to achieve the result that the survey commissioner desires. We on TDO were dissecting surveys long before Edinburgh came along. The problem you have is that you don't like the truth.
When the truth doesn't suite, you are quite happy to bury it.
Jacobs said Edinburgh Radio Jobs amount to 7,750 per week. The actual amount is over 45,000.
The other day you boasted you know all about the Edinburgh Taxi trade, I'm beginning to doubt you were ever in the Edinburgh Taxi trade.
Quote:
The conclusion of the Jacob's report that there is no unmet demand is valid as anyone living and working in Edinburgh is well aware.
I'm not remotely interested about whether or not unmet demand does or does not exist in Edinburgh. My interest lies in evidence being portrayed as fact and a council administering its duty under the law. When a council decides on a policy and it needs a special report to sustain that policy then it should make every effort to make sure that the report is accurate and factual. I am sure you agree with that. When the report is found to be inaccurate then no matter what the inaccuracies are that report is flawed.
If you were in a court of law and the opposing side presented evidence that was flawed you would no doubt expect the bench to throw that evidence out would you not?
Quote:
yes there are always the morons that say there are not enough taxis - they're usually the ones that want a taxi at peak, and only, peak times.
I don't know what con trick JD is using to trick hotel staff into giving him their opinion, but no doubt it will be some dishonesty going by the way that he is trying to manipulate his findings to fit in with his own beliefs of numerical derestriction.
My oh my, I can see you have a dark side. You can always phone these hotels up yourself and ask them what con tricks JD used to get them to divulge the information of whether or not they have a direct line to a Taxi or Private hire company? It is hardly a top-secret information?
I must inform everyone that has read the Jacobs report that the names in the first field to the left-hand side of the Table of Hotels are the names of the contact person. It will interest you to know that Jacobs contacted these people by telephone and what's more they were either the concierge or the receptionist. So now you know why they only contacted eight hotels out of the hundred plus in Edinburgh, it is because they were concerned about their telephone bill.
At least three of those persons contacted no longer work at the Hotels in question. Their names are Minna, Holiday Inn, David Black, Macdonald Roxburgh and Charlene, The Glasshouse hotel.
Of the others The Sheraton Hotel has never heard of Alan Down, perhaps the next time you guys in Edinburgh are at the Sheraton you might wish to enquire about Mr Down because it seems he is a mystery man. There is an Alan Brown but I spoke to him and he has never heard of Jacobs and they certainly didn't contact him about a Taxi survey. So there you have it.
Quote:
Christ, this site is flawed enough without him making it worse.
The fact is that he must be a really sad bar-steward poking his nose in to matters about which he knows absolutely nothing and believing all that skull and his band of arselicking f uckwipes tell him.
I don't think there is any need to resort to this kind of language, do you? It really does you no favours and just highlights the fact that at times you have a propensity to explode into rages of anger.
Regards
JD