Sussex wrote:
I'm a licensed PH owner-driver, and have been for too many years. I look forward to the day when I'm a license HC owner-driver. I can afford to buy a plate, but wont, I can afford to buy a WAV, and will.
I think that if a driver meets whatever criteria a council sets, then they should be given a HC plate, if they so wish. If they wish to carry on as a PH owner, or as a HC jockey, then good luck to them. But let it be their choice, no-one else's.
You see this is where we have a problem Sussex because some people don't have the same choices you have because of their personal circumstances.
If a driver meets whatever criteria he is given a badge, it is only when he can produce a vehicle which meets the councils criteria that he can obtain a plate.
If the councils criteria is set so that you can afford to purchase a vehicle but excludes as many as restrictions did from doing so because of financial restraints, do you claim a victory in "driver choice" or equality.
There is no way we are going to comply with legislation and be fair to everybody, derestriction doesn't make it fair to everyone but you champion the cause for derestriction because it allows you a plate as you are in a more fortunate financial position than most.
The only fair way to distribute plates would be to just distribute plates to fit and proper people who's own private vehicle passes an MOT.
Any other way involves large financial investment, and although you may be able to afford it, just think of all the people who will complain that you got a plate because you could afford it and the fact that they couldn't wasn't fair, even though they had their badge.
Deresriction allows only those with adequate finances to enter the trade, the thing that stopped them buying a plate was their principles therefore taking a plate for free and working as and alongside people who disgust them show how strong their principles really are.
B. Lucky