Sussex wrote:
cab happy wrote:
3.5 The Department for Transport (DOT), whilst not agreeing with the OFT report, has written to local authorities indicating that the LA’s should consider removing any policy that they have with regard to numerical restrictions of hackney carriage licences. However, the Government stance is that local authorities should keep numerical restrictions on the issue of hackney carriage licences if it is considered appropriate to do so.
Is that right?
Did the DfT not agree with OFT, or did they agree but decided, at the mo, to leave it to councils to decide for themselves?
![Think :-k](./images/smilies/eusa_think.gif)
I suppose that the statement could be justified, but then again it's essentially misleading. The writer has obviously heavily spun things to misrepresent the true position in some ways, but has done so in a manner such that a case could be made to justify the claims.
I would say that the DfT essentially agreed with the OFT re the desirability of restricted numbers, thus to that extent the first statement is wrong, but to the extent that the DfT disagree about making derestriction mandatory then the statement is correct
The claim that the Govt said that LAs should keep restrictions when appropriate to do so is also vaguely correct since the Govts stance was that restrictions might be justified, but only where derestriction led to consumer detriment, so the Nottingham statement perhaps implies a bit more leeway for LAs than the Govt intended.