Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed Jun 26, 2024 12:07 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2004 12:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Cleary a newspaper columnist in Liverpool wasn't too impressed by the council's evidence to the Transport Committee, according to this in the Echo:

HOW dare large parts of the media and numerous commentators describe the Hutton Report as a "whitewash"?

When something costs pounds 2m and takes more than six months to produce, one should at least have the decency to call it Snowflake White gloss, with a hint of rose.

With his keen eye for the truth, I wonder if Lord Hutton was behind a recent report to the Office of Fair Trading about why Liverpool does not need any more taxis.

The report states: "In the city centre, taxicab users do not have to wait for a taxi. A taxicab can always be found on rank. The population of Liverpool and its visitors find no difficulty in obtaining taxicabs."

Yes, that's right. And Saddam could have launched a nuclear attack within 45 minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2004 3:09 am 
What a shoddy attack on Lord Hutton, you are no better than the countrys gutter press.

as for the evidence about attack in 45 minutes what very short memories most people have.

cannot anyone remember the churchill-matrix, and Astra saga?

let me remind you it was known as the supergun affair. the government then tory, put directors of arms companies on charge for illegaly supplying weapons to iraq, then it was discovered that under the official secrets act vital evidence was witheld to the defense side.

in smart words that government were to send directors to prison, for suppling arms which the government had ordered and given credit lines for.

so there is a cleft stick, do you declare weapons of mass destruction found
and then find that they were actualy built in Britain, or not declare any?


of course iraq had weapons of mass destruction we built the bloody things thats how we know!


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2004 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54377
Location: 1066 Country
I think you have missed the point Mr Guest.

If even the local press doesn't believe what the Liverpool contingent told the Select Committee, why should we? :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2004 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37029
Location: Wayneistan
churchill-matrix, was that that film?

Liverpool, that place accoring to latest reports from the city council, has birds singing, the sun in the sky, people drinking expensive wine alfresco from wine bars, and taxi and private hire drivers living in perfect harmony.

I'd like to teach the world to sing, in perfect harmony.....

Regards

Captain Cab


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 12:04 am
Posts: 725
Location: Essex, England
Yorkie wrote:
What a shoddy attack on Lord Hutton, you are no better than the countrys gutter press.

as for the evidence about attack in 45 minutes what very short memories most people have.

cannot anyone remember the churchill-matrix, and Astra saga?

let me remind you it was known as the supergun affair. the government then tory, put directors of arms companies on charge for illegaly supplying weapons to iraq, then it was discovered that under the official secrets act vital evidence was witheld to the defense side.

in smart words that government were to send directors to prison, for suppling arms which the government had ordered and given credit lines for.

so there is a cleft stick, do you declare weapons of mass destruction found
and then find that they were actualy built in Britain, or not declare any?


of course iraq had weapons of mass destruction we built the bloody things thats how we know!



Gosh, Yorkie.

We were one of the transport companies that carried it, and yours truly was one of the drivers. However, Supergun was not a weapon of mass destruction, and it was passed out through Dover Customs with the minimum of formalities.

The truth about Supergun, is that it was Oil Pipeline equipment. It said so on our T.I.R. carnets.

Methinks the idea was simple. Iraq was gonna fire oil at Israel from the Sueprgun, to avoid having to ship it through the Suez Canal.

Note: No-one from our Company was ever called to give evidence to the Commons Select Committee enquiry. Paul Ashwell (the guy who got arrested in Greece) was not, as far as I am aware, ever questioned by committee either. Clearly, thats because we were too thick to know anything about it.

All I remember, is that one Sunday night, all the remaining trailers had to shipped to Calais on the double, so that Matrix Churchill and Sheffield Forgemasters could draw down on their Letters of Credit.

As I recollect, and my memory is (necessarily) vague on such things, a few months before Supergun, we had another job carrying weapons systems and the like down to Portsmoth to be loaded on an Exhibition shp due to sail for the mddle east (Iraq). It was one of the Townsend Thoresen ships. Viking Voyager or something like that. The name did amuse me as I remember.

Oh for the good old days....

_________________
There is Significant Unmet Demand for my Opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 08, 2004 5:38 pm 
The Hutton report was out on the day of the OFT slating, a bad day turned into a good one IMHO :D :D :D


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 08, 2004 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54377
Location: 1066 Country
You know what, I really think you actually believe that. :? :? :? :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 1:49 am 
Andy7 wrote:
Yorkie wrote:
What a shoddy attack on Lord Hutton, you are no better than the countrys gutter press.

as for the evidence about attack in 45 minutes what very short memories most people have.

cannot anyone remember the churchill-matrix, and Astra saga?

let me remind you it was known as the supergun affair. the government then tory, put directors of arms companies on charge for illegaly supplying weapons to iraq, then it was discovered that under the official secrets act vital evidence was witheld to the defense side.

in smart words that government were to send directors to prison, for suppling arms which the government had ordered and given credit lines for.

so there is a cleft stick, do you declare weapons of mass destruction found
and then find that they were actualy built in Britain, or not declare any?


of course iraq had weapons of mass destruction we built the bloody things thats how we know!



Gosh, Yorkie.

We were one of the transport companies that carried it, and yours truly was one of the drivers. However, Supergun was not a weapon of mass destruction, and it was passed out through Dover Customs with the minimum of formalities.

The truth about Supergun, is that it was Oil Pipeline equipment. It said so on our T.I.R. carnets.

Methinks the idea was simple. Iraq was gonna fire oil at Israel from the Sueprgun, to avoid having to ship it through the Suez Canal.

Note: No-one from our Company was ever called to give evidence to the Commons Select Committee enquiry. Paul Ashwell (the guy who got arrested in Greece) was not, as far as I am aware, ever questioned by committee either. Clearly, thats because we were too thick to know anything about it.

All I remember, is that one Sunday night, all the remaining trailers had to shipped to Calais on the double, so that Matrix Churchill and Sheffield Forgemasters could draw down on their Letters of Credit.

As I recollect, and my memory is (necessarily) vague on such things, a few months before Supergun, we had another job carrying weapons systems and the like down to Portsmoth to be loaded on an Exhibition shp due to sail for the mddle east (Iraq). It was one of the Townsend Thoresen ships. Viking Voyager or something like that. The name did amuse me as I remember.

Oh for the good old days....



Well thats what the court case was about, apparently gun steel isnt used on oil pipelines.

and a local firm here made something for it it was definitly a WOMD.

the government said so.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:24 am 
Sussex Man wrote:
You know what, I really think you actually believe that. :? :? :? :?


When the delegaton turned up at the house of commons it was full of the press covering the Hutton report, when the press was asked, are you here for the OFT report??? The press said what??? Oh happy days :D :D :D :D :D :D


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54377
Location: 1066 Country
And your point is? :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 3:10 pm 
Suspect, nobody knows anything about the OFT report in the house of commons, thats why it's been a waist of money. [/b]


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 4:09 pm 
Nidge wrote:
Suspect, nobody knows anything about the OFT report in the house of commons, thats why it's been a waist of money. [/b]


Nige
I cannot believe anybody can believe that this report will be put on a shelf and forgotten.

this is the height of optomism on your part.

action will be taken on this report, we can only speculate what action that will be.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 4:34 pm 
Nidge wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Nidge wrote:
Suspect, nobody knows anything about the OFT report in the house of commons, thats why it's been a waist of money. [/b]



The report has already been welcomed by the government
will it be acted upon?
it is being now in local authorities up and down this land.
Nige, you either dont understand the mechanisms of political control or you are being eternally blind.

anyway didnt you say you were leavibg the trade?

with this behaviour you soon will, by choice or otherwise.

Nige
I cannot believe anybody can believe that this report will be put on a shelf and forgotten.

this is the height of optomism on your part.

action will be taken on this report, we can only speculate what action that will be.


The hight of optmisim is will it be accepted???? Will it heck as like.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54377
Location: 1066 Country
Nidge wrote:
Suspect, nobody knows anything about the OFT report in the house of commons, thats why it's been a waist of money.


Firstly, the government has to reply by March 9th. Look for the words 'guidance' in the short term, and 'statutes' in the long term.

Secondly, the fact that nobody in the house knows nothing about OFT is hardly surprising, just look at those on the select committee. :shock:

But if what you say is true, then that's evidence itself that the T&G is full of s***.

All I have been reading in CTN, all the trade press, and on taxi forums, is that the T&G have umpteen MPs that follow the T&G agenda.

Well if they know nothing, then that must be the T&G agenda, nothing. :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 9:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 12:04 am
Posts: 725
Location: Essex, England
Supergun was a gun. Not a WOMD.

It would only become so, if you used nuclear or bacteriological warheads.

I may well be wrong, but I dont `think' we supplied any of those things.

Who knows, stranger things have happened.

_________________
There is Significant Unmet Demand for my Opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 98 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group