Taxi Driver Online
http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Response to the response to the response to the report.
http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=471		 Page 1 of 5
Author:  Sussex [ Thu Mar 11, 2004 5:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Response to the response to the response to the report.
As clear as mud. :shock:

http://www.parliament.the-stationery-of ... /41803.htm
Author:  Guest [ Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:19 pm ]
Post subject: 
Its not difficult SM.

The OFT are standing by what they said and so are the Select Committee.

B. Lucky :twisted:
Author:  Sussex [ Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:46 pm ]
Post subject: 
Well I know that, it's just that I couldn't wait to write that heading. :wink:
Author:  captain cab [ Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:08 pm ]
Post subject: 
children in the playground

if the oft respond again, will it be a response to a response to the response of a response?

the oft report was shot into pieces because it forgot the trade is different in different areas.

the tdo myth and reality piece, compiled at a fraction of the £250k the oft report cost (he he), was far more relevent to the trade we know

regards

captain cab
Author:  Sussex [ Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:13 pm ]
Post subject: 
captain cab wrote:
if the oft respond again, will it be a response to a response to the response of a response?


I don't think they will, to me they seem very confident in the outcome. :shock:
Author:  captain cab [ Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:16 pm ]
Post subject: 
hitler was confident, physicotic, but confident :lol:

regards

caprtin cab
Author:  Guest [ Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:22 pm ]
Post subject: 
captain cab wrote:
the tdo myth and reality piece, compiled at a fraction of the £250k the oft report cost (he he), was far more relevent to the trade we know


I couldn't agree more, but I fear it will not be considered.

The minister may never respond to the OFT report, apparently he has no duty to, unless he intends the findings to form some legislationary change. The earliest he will report now, if ever, will be the end of this month.

I think that the OFT are confident in standing by their findings, however as more and more better written papers are produced the government will have to consider whether the OFT investigation would be used to form government reccomendations to local authorities as it doesn't seem it would be possible to base any legislationary changes on the findings of the OFT.

I think that people looking for saviours should got to church, instead of Beachy Head.

B. Lucky :twisted:
Author:  Guest [ Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:24 pm ]
Post subject: 
Sussex Man wrote:
I don't think they will, to me they seem very confident in the outcome. :shock:


Not as confident as you are in wrecking the H/C trade though Sussex.

B. Lucky :twisted:
Author:  Sussex [ Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:34 pm ]
Post subject: 
Anonymous wrote:
Not as confident as you are in wrecking the H/C trade though Sussex.


An interesting comment.

I want all licensed drivers to have the same opportunities, and that means wrecking the HC trade. :?
Author:  captain cab [ Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:38 pm ]
Post subject: 
sussex,

leave us to it, we can wreck it ourselves :shock:

thanks

captain cab
Author:  Sussex [ Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:41 pm ]
Post subject: 
captain cab wrote:
leave us to it, we can wreck it ourselves :shock:


Now I was going to say something like that, but I'm far too reserved. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Author:  Cgull [ Fri Mar 12, 2004 8:11 pm ]
Post subject: 
My response to the response to the respoonse to the rteponse is to p*** off and leave us alone. :shock:
Author:  2old4this [ Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:19 pm ]
Post subject: 
Some explain to me what the above report means it it in favour of open market or not :wink:
Author:  Guest [ Sat Mar 13, 2004 3:21 am ]
Post subject: 
2old for this, the answer is not.

amazing quip from mick there that the minister does not have to respond!

Ministers Mick dont have to do anything pal, it amuses me when they say they have this and that responsibility, they dont, all responsibilities are vested in permanent secretaries.

the only responsibility they have is speaking for thier department in the commons, and then they are given the speach.

Geoff
Author:  Guest [ Sat Mar 13, 2004 7:03 am ]
Post subject: 
Thank you for confirming my post Geoff, and for offering further explaination.

B. Lucky :twisted:
Page 1 of 5 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/