Taxi Driver Online :: View topic - New Legislation? Do we need it?

We are all on about a single-tier system, but the truth is, we had one until July 2002.

The ultimate in single tier licensing was for us all to have licensed our taxis as PSVs, and operate to consistent national legislation.

So, in fact, the ultimate single tier was actually removed by Sec 265 of the 2000 Transport Act.

If they had not done that, we really could all have been equal. Because before the Sec was introduced, you could operate as a Hack or PH under the former PSV rules.

Are we therefore not now going backwards?

Anonymous wrote:

no we are stopping our scottish cousains abusing rules and regs
as well you know it.

Yorkie wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

no we are stopping our scottish cousains abusing rules and regs
as well you know it.

Please elaborate Yorkie

Do we need new legislation?

Taking into account that taxi laws go back to before the combustion engine was invented, then you could say yes. :shock:

Well in that case, I've no problem with them being restricted.

Just let the ones with engines be freed up.

Author:	Guest [ Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:57 pm ]
Post subject:	New Legislation? Do we need it?
We are all on about a single-tier system, but the truth is, we had one until July 2002. The ultimate in single tier licensing was for us all to have licensed our taxis as PSVs, and operate to consistent national legislation. So, in fact, the ultimate single tier was actually removed by Sec 265 of the 2000 Transport Act. If they had not done that, we really could all have been equal. Because before the Sec was introduced, you could operate as a Hack or PH under the former PSV rules. Are we therefore not now going backwards?

Author:	Yorkie [ Tue Mar 16, 2004 1:51 am ]
Post subject:	Re: New Legislation? Do we need it?
Anonymous wrote: We are all on about a single-tier system, but the truth is, we had one until July 2002. The ultimate in single tier licensing was for us all to have licensed our taxis as PSVs, and operate to consistent national legislation. So, in fact, the ultimate single tier was actually removed by Sec 265 of the 2000 Transport Act. If they had not done that, we really could all have been equal. Because before the Sec was introduced, you could operate as a Hack or PH under the former PSV rules. Are we therefore not now going backwards? no we are stopping our scottish cousains abusing rules and regs as well you know it.

Author:	Guest [ Tue Mar 16, 2004 2:37 am ]
Post subject:	Re: New Legislation? Do we need it?
Yorkie wrote: Anonymous wrote: We are all on about a single-tier system, but the truth is, we had one until July 2002. The ultimate in single tier licensing was for us all to have licensed our taxis as PSVs, and operate to consistent national legislation. So, in fact, the ultimate single tier was actually removed by Sec 265 of the 2000 Transport Act. If they had not done that, we really could all have been equal. Because before the Sec was introduced, you could operate as a Hack or PH under the former PSV rules. Are we therefore not now going backwards? no we are stopping our scottish cousains abusing rules and regs as well you know it. Please elaborate Yorkie

Author:	Yorkie [ Tue Mar 16, 2004 3:50 am ]
Post subject:	Re: New Legislation? Do we need it?
Anonymous wrote: Yorkie wrote: Anonymous wrote: We are all on about a single-tier system, but the truth is, we had one until July 2002. The ultimate in single tier licensing was for us all to have licensed our taxis as PSVs, and operate to consistent national legislation. So, in fact, the ultimate single tier was actually removed by Sec 265 of the 2000 Transport Act. If they had not done that, we really could all have been equal. Because before the Sec was introduced, you could operate as a Hack or PH under the former PSV rules. Are we therefore not now going backwards? no we are stopping our scottish cousains abusing rules and regs as well you know it. Please elaborate Yorkie certainly, the problem arose in one of the scottish commission areas where the local council had high license fees, and they were turning the plates in and using the buses.(abusing single fare schemes) thiis was never as intended by the law at that time, indeed drivers did not even need a badge under 8 seats. So the law was "clarified" in so doing many rural services had to be suspended. just one of those wheezes by smart alecs where instead of interpreting the law broadly they drove a coach and horses through it.

Author:	Guest [ Tue Mar 16, 2004 5:11 am ]
Post subject:
Thank you for that yorkie, very intresting

Taxi Driver Online http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

New Legislation? Do we need it? http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=490	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Sussex [ Tue Mar 16, 2004 7:54 am ]
Post subject:
Do we need new legislation? Taking into account that taxi laws go back to before the combustion engine was invented, then you could say yes.

Author:	Guest [ Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:18 pm ]
Post subject:
Sussex wrote: Do we need new legislation? Taking into account that taxi laws go back to before the combustion engine was invented, then you could say yes. we have been through this beffore, not all of Britains hackneys are engine proppelled. something we often miss Yorkie

Author:	Sussex [ Wed Mar 17, 2004 9:05 pm ]
Post subject:
Well in that case, I've no problem with them being restricted. Just let the ones with engines be freed up.

Author:	Guest [ Wed Mar 17, 2004 9:34 pm ]
Post subject:
Sussex wrote: Well in that case, I've no problem with them being restricted. Just let the ones with engines be freed up.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/