Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun Apr 26, 2026 6:25 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 5:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:12 am
Posts: 590
Location: North Of The Tyne
skippy41 wrote:
gusmac wrote:
If the TX4 is that good a vehicle, it should have no problem selling on the open market.

So why do LTI have to rely on the PCO and certain councils' rules to make their money?

Why do LTI go to so much trouble to preserve their monopoly?


=D> =D> =D> =D> Well said guss
Me an all =D> =D> =D>

_________________
www.youtube.com/watch?v=z07K29Fc15U


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 3:01 am
Posts: 147
Location: FifeCentral
scousemouse wrote:
I probably should have written a bit more in that last post. It sounds irrelevant. It is my first WAV, and BTW I plated it for Glenrothes, Fife.

It's the first one in the area. Very happy with it.


Really? You are hiding this new tx4 very well in Glenrothes :shock: When can we expect to see this "new" taxi down the rank? Should be easy to spot because we only have 43 public hire plates here. Last WAV on our rank was a new style Scudo some 8 weeks ago

Mr mouse? Mr mouse? Can you come out from behind the skirting and answer please? :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:17 am
Posts: 102
There's never been a TX on Glenrothes as far as I know. I visit fairly regularly as I have family there. I've only seen Scudos and the odd Euro-type taxi. Other than that it's all saloons.

I think he's pulling our leg. It's not even as though he said Fife (there are TXs in Kirkcaldy), he distinctly said Glenrothes.

By the way - The taxi drivers in Glenrothes are always great. I've used Murray's and a few others over the years and always been pleased with the service.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
broxibear wrote:
scousemouse wrote:
I probably should have written a bit more in that last post. It sounds irrelevant. It is my first WAV, and BTW I plated it for Glenrothes, Fife.

It's the first one in the area. Very happy with it.


Really? You are hiding this new tx4 very well in Glenrothes :shock: When can we expect to see this "new" taxi down the rank? Should be easy to spot because we only have 43 public hire plates here. Last WAV on our rank was a new style Scudo some 8 weeks ago

Mr mouse? Mr mouse? Can you come out from behind the skirting and answer please? :mrgreen:


Its probably flecked already, that's if its not a figment of his :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: imagination :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
skippy41 wrote:
scousemouse wrote:
What is meant by that? Have you owned a TX4?


I take it you have not read the posts on here regarding the TX range,
and all the problems with them.



I've only ever owned LTI Taxi's.

I've not had any problems.

As Jimbo says Skippy, what PB Taxi's have you owned from LTI, and what problems have you encountered? :-k


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
baloo_bear wrote:
:lol: no the w/chair and passenger were both taken by a very unhappy car driver :x ,so in this case the wav was correct by going by the drivers agreement as i thought,if the person was wheelchair bound the argument would never of took place,in this case the car driver did not really want the job and was spouting nonsence :shock:




...... and next time she will book a PH.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
GBC wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
scousemouse wrote:
What is meant by that? Have you owned a TX4?


I take it you have not read the posts on here regarding the TX range,
and all the problems with them.



I've only ever owned LTI Taxi's.

I've not had any problems.

As Jimbo says Skippy, what PB Taxi's have you owned from LTI, and what problems have you encountered? :-k











I see you've already answered that. :oops:

As MrT and others have pointed out, The FX range is a far cry from the Nissan engine that was introduced in 1989. Apart from the issue with the turbo hoses, I can't say i've met a dissapointed driver that owns the new model. I suspect by the time I buy mine (2008?) the minor problems should have been resolved.

I've covered 280K in my TX1, apart from water pump, radiator and some other minor bits and bobs, it's still going strong. (The Hudsons are still going in case anyone wondered)

Competition would always be welcomed in London, so long as the alternative will stand up to non-stop work, door's opening and closing dozen's of times during a shift, and the front suspension is up to the job of supporting my money bag.

:D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 4:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:20 am
Posts: 2948
Location: Over here!
I still cannot get my head around as to why the OFT have never got involved re LTI.

Funny hand shake gang must be at work :shock:

_________________
if you cannot be yourself, then who can you be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
cabby john wrote:
I still cannot get my head around as to why the OFT have never got involved re LTI.

Maybe it's because no-one has asked them. :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
cabby john wrote:
I still cannot get my head around as to why the OFT have never got involved re LTI.

Funny hand shake gang must be at work :shock:


And I can't get my head round why you think the OFT should get involved.

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 4:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:20 am
Posts: 2948
Location: Over here!
jimbo wrote:
cabby john wrote:
I still cannot get my head around as to why the OFT have never got involved re LTI.

Funny hand shake gang must be at work :shock:


And I can't get my head round why you think the OFT should get involved.


It is quite simple, Red Ken insists on LTI cabs only for London to the exclusion of any other make. That in itself is an unfair trading practice, hence why I say the OFT should be involved.

To my mind if it were not for him - LTI would not be anymore, as it would seem that the bulk of their trade has been done through London.

_________________
if you cannot be yourself, then who can you be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
cabby john wrote:
jimbo wrote:
cabby john wrote:
I still cannot get my head around as to why the OFT have never got involved re LTI.

Funny hand shake gang must be at work :shock:


And I can't get my head round why you think the OFT should get involved.


It is quite simple, Red Ken insists on LTI cabs only for London to the exclusion of any other make. That in itself is an unfair trading practice, hence why I say the OFT should be involved.

To my mind if it were not for him - LTI would not be anymore, as it would seem that the bulk of their trade has been done through London.


You are, simply put, wrong.

Any manufacturer can build a vehicle to meet the present Conditions of Fitness, as Metrocab did.

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:20 am
Posts: 2948
Location: Over here!
jimbo wrote:
cabby john wrote:
jimbo wrote:
cabby john wrote:
I still cannot get my head around as to why the OFT have never got involved re LTI.

Funny hand shake gang must be at work :shock:


And I can't get my head round why you think the OFT should get involved.


It is quite simple, Red Ken insists on LTI cabs only for London to the exclusion of any other make. That in itself is an unfair trading practice, hence why I say the OFT should be involved.

To my mind if it were not for him - LTI would not be anymore, as it would seem that the bulk of their trade has been done through London.


You are, simply put, wrong.

Any manufacturer can build a vehicle to meet the present Conditions of Fitness, as Metrocab did.


Jimbo you are missing the point that you raised concerning "OFT." I am not arguing against the right to build any vehicle, what I am saying is that they "LTI" have a unique/cartel trading privilege signed by "Ken."

This should be looked at by the OFT because as it stands they can charge what they like for the vehicles. As it is, they charge an extortionate price, and that is not right because London taxi drivers cannot purchase any other vehicle.

Oil companies,Supermarkets, Microsoft have all been taken to task over having a monopoly of their respective markets along with price fixing.

You have exactly the same situation with LTI, no competition allowed, so they can and do charge what they like.

_________________
if you cannot be yourself, then who can you be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
Maybe he's just safeguarding the jobs of his red comrades in China :lol:
We all know how environmentally friendly they are. :lol:

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
cabby john wrote:
jimbo wrote:
cabby john wrote:
jimbo wrote:
cabby john wrote:
I still cannot get my head around as to why the OFT have never got involved re LTI.

Funny hand shake gang must be at work :shock:


And I can't get my head round why you think the OFT should get involved.


It is quite simple, Red Ken insists on LTI cabs only for London to the exclusion of any other make. That in itself is an unfair trading practice, hence why I say the OFT should be involved.

To my mind if it were not for him - LTI would not be anymore, as it would seem that the bulk of their trade has been done through London.


You are, simply put, wrong.

Any manufacturer can build a vehicle to meet the present Conditions of Fitness, as Metrocab did.


Jimbo you are missing the point that you raised concerning "OFT." I am not arguing against the right to build any vehicle, what I am saying is that they "LTI" have a unique/cartel trading privilege signed by "Ken."

This should be looked at by the OFT because as it stands they can charge what they like for the vehicles. As it is, they charge an extortionate price, and that is not right because London taxi drivers cannot purchase any other vehicle.

Oil companies,Supermarkets, Microsoft have all been taken to task over having a monopoly of their respective markets along with price fixing.

You have exactly the same situation with LTI, no competition allowed, so they can and do charge what they like.



So call the OFT and ask them to investigate.

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1596 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group