Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 11:38 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 253
Location: Crawley
grandad wrote:
They just amended the 1976 act to remove the contract exemption so why couldn't they do something with this?


Because there are a lot of lawyers out there waiting for the cheques to start rolling in!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :wink:

_________________
Our safety is Paramount


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
grandad wrote:
They just amended the 1976 act to remove the contract exemption so why couldn't they do something with this?

It would appear they didn't feel the need.

And I'm quite happy with the ceremony bit. :D

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
grandad wrote:
They just amended the 1976 act to remove the contract exemption so why couldn't they do something with this?


I think its fairly obvious that they didn't realise it presented a problem.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:32 pm
Posts: 552
Location: london/croydon
BUT why is there an exemption at all, why should wedding and funeral cars be exempt.. They are both a commercial vehicle with paid drivers or owner drivers..? and is it not the same risk having an unsafe wedding car on the road as any other hire car. the funeral car is the same only there is no danger to the passenger in the hurse....only other road users.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
no tips wrote:
BUT why is there an exemption at all, why should wedding and funeral cars be exempt.. They are both a commercial vehicle with paid drivers or owner drivers..? and is it not the same risk having an unsafe wedding car on the road as any other hire car. the funeral car is the same only there is no danger to the passenger in the hurse....only other road users.
The funeral exemption covers the family cars, not the hearse which doesn't carry a fare paying passenger. (A corpse is "goods in transit" :wink: )

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:32 pm
Posts: 552
Location: london/croydon
gusmac wrote:
no tips wrote:
BUT why is there an exemption at all, why should wedding and funeral cars be exempt.. They are both a commercial vehicle with paid drivers or owner drivers..? and is it not the same risk having an unsafe wedding car on the road as any other hire car. the funeral car is the same only there is no danger to the passenger in the hurse....only other road users.
The funeral exemption covers the family cars, not the hearse which doesn't carry a fare paying passenger. (A corpse is "goods in transit" :wink: )


So why is an exemtion needed ,its stright hire & reward..even though its going to a graveyard.as with wedding cars ..anyone can go on Ebay and buy a wreck and can legally the next day be taking brides to there weddings. The excemtions should all be stopped.and a license as with any other hire vehicle be needed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
no tips wrote:
BUT why is there an exemption at all, why should wedding and funeral cars be exempt..

Because they lobbied really well back in 1975. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 141 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group