Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 4:23 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 1:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
greenbadgecabby wrote:
Well thats news to me.

I joined the trade in the eighties and all I recall is questions why the London Minicab trade was the only un-licensed PH in the country.

Perhaps it was the TGWU?

Why would we oppose a bill that wiped out 15'000 of the opposition in one sweep?

Why would we oppose a bill that upped their costs, to the extent that most of the large firms charge the same or more than Licensed Taxi's?



Good questions, but that's what the rest of us have been saying for years.

But I think the answer lies in the 'legitimisation' argument.

After all, if PH had been regulated years ago, a lot of the stuff you post on here might never have arisen.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 1:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
greenbadgecabby wrote:
Screeaamm!

How can I take advantage of the situation by working a day I was working regardless.

The ones that took advantage were the ones that were RIPPING people of, overcharging people who had no choice.



So you're saying that if I came across a car crash and took one of the parties home and charged them for it, the I wouldn't be taking advantage if I'd have been working that day anyway?

Surely you 'took advantage' if you took people home who would otherwise have went by bus or tube? #-o

As I said, we all take advantage, it's just a question of degree, but while the mincab drivers charging hundreds were way OTT, surely even saint GBC (O:) ) was taking advantage, even if only a teensy-weensy little bit?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 1:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
greenbadgecabby wrote:
TDO wrote:
As for the 'war zone' business, that may be a slight exaggeration, but why was everyone heading away from central London that day, and the buses weren't operating at all, for example?


Because they thought they would'nt get home otherwise.

Hardly running scared from 3 underground incidents and a Bus.

The Buses were stopped by the 'Code Red' alert issued under the London resillience plan, but that was lifted in the afternoon and all the Buses and Trains were operating again by 5.


Oh yes, everyone in London just carried on regardless of the ' 3 underground incidents and a bus'. :-s

So why was central London deserted in the late evening if all the buses and trains were operating by late afternoon and your night colleagues were doing jack?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 1:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
greenbadgecabby wrote:
:shock: 3 days and no replies? I'm getting worried.

Ah! Dusty's on Holiday.............. 8)


On holiday from this thread maybe ](*,)

But you'll be glad to hear that I'm taking a permanent holiday from this thread, because never the twain shall meet :D

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
TDO wrote:
Oh yes, everyone in London just carried on regardless of the ' 3 underground incidents and a bus'. :-s

So why was central London deserted in the late evening if all the buses and trains were operating by late afternoon and your night colleagues were doing jack?


The point I was trying to get across, was that if all the buses and train stations had been allowed to remain open, as they were at the height of the IRA atrocoties, people (The Majority) would have continued their lives as per the norm.

You forget most of us down here has been there seen it and got the proverbial T-Shirt.

As for Saint GBC, good point. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 3:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
TDO wrote:
[
No, it was a speech in the Commons by the sponsor of the Bill to license minicabs - you'll see that he cites the opposition of the black cab trade on two seperate occassions regarding 1989 and 1994.





Not according to this Journalist.

5th para down.






22 January 1998


SLT calls for support for London's minicabs bill


Diana Lamplugh, Director, The Suzy Lamplugh Trust, the national charity for personal safety, will be at the House of Commons tomorrow to call for full parliamentary support for Sir George Young's Private Members Bill, proposing legislation for minicabs in London. The bill, which will mean that all the capital's minicabs be licensed through the Public Carriage Office, gets its second reading in the House of Commons on Friday 23 January.

A conference organised by the Trust at Stringfellows last week found that while 51% of Londoner's have no idea that minicabs are not regulated (Which? Magazine, September 1997), more than one rape a week occurred in a London minicabs in 1997 (Met. Police).

"We're calling on MPs and peers to consider their mothers, sisters, friends and daughters when they vote for this bill," says Diana Lamplugh OBE. "Last week's conference showed that we cannot risk any more assaults or rapes by unlicensed minicab drivers," explains Mrs Lamplugh. "Black cab and minicab representatives were unanimous in their support of legislation, understanding that the detail of the regulations could be agreed at a later stage."

The Trust has been campaigning for regulation of minicabs in the capital for ten years, knowing there are real dangers for everyone, particularly the most vulnerable - retired, elderly and disabled people, young children, teenagers and women travelling on their own, as well as tourists and visitors to London.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 3:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
But that's 1998, innit?

And it's the third paragraph, not the fifth - there's only four anyway :wink:

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 620 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group