| Taxi Driver Online http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| Duty of care minicabs http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=3910 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | JD [ Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Duty of care minicabs |
(Rogers v Night Riders (CA (Civ Div)) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) c.1983 [1983] R.T.R. 324 Summary Subject: Negligence Minicab firm; duty to provide drivers and vehicles fit for the purpose; whether delegable A minicab firm who undertook to the general public to convey a passenger to her destination owed that passenger a duty to take reasonable steps to ensure that the vehicle provided for her is properly maintained and reasonably fit for that purpose. D were firms which operated a minicab service: they hired radios to car-hire drivers, and ensured that drivers on their list held a licence for two years and had their own private hire insurance. The drivers owned, maintained, and controlled their own vehicles. P asked for a minicab from D and a vehicle arrived. During the journey the door on P's side flew open, hit a stationary vehicle, and rebounded hitting P. She sued them for damages in negligence. The driver of the vehicle could not be traced and the action against him was discontinued. The judge found that the driver had been negligent in failing properly to maintain his vehicle, but that the relation between him and D was that of independent contractor and principal, and so D were not liable for his negligent acts. He dismissed the action. Summary: Held, allowing P's appeal, that on the facts D had held themselves out to the general public as a car-hire firm undertaking to provide a vehicle to convey P to her destination. They could foresee that P might be injured if the vehicle provided for her was defective and accordingly owed her a duty to take reasonable steps to ensure that the vehicle was properly maintained and reasonably fit for that purpose. That duty could not be delegated to a third party such as the driver, whether an employee or an independent contractor, so as to evade responsibility for breach of that duty. Citations to the Case Considered by Aiken v Stewart Wrightson Members Agency Ltd, [1995] 1 W.L.R. 1281; [1995] 3 All E.R. 449; [1995] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 618; Times, March 8, 1995 (QBD (Comm)) |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|