| Taxi Driver Online http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| working for UBER http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=41675 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | grandad [ Fri Aug 01, 2025 11:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | working for UBER |
Can a Hackney driver who has his badge and vehicle license in one area where UBER does not hold an operators license work for UBER using the same badge and license in another area where they do have an operators license for instance using a badge and license issued by Melton Borough Council to work for UBER in Leicester? |
|
| Author: | heathcote [ Fri Aug 01, 2025 5:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: working for UBER |
I would say NO. |
|
| Author: | Chris the Fish [ Fri Aug 01, 2025 5:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: working for UBER |
I don't like it, but I think yes. A Hackney (Driver and Vehicle) is PH anywhere, and the UBER booking is, in effect, PH. |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Fri Aug 01, 2025 6:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: working for UBER |
grandad wrote: Can a Hackney driver who has his badge and vehicle license in one area where UBER does not hold an operators license work for UBER using the same badge and license in another area where they do have an operators license for instance using a badge and license issued by Melton Borough Council to work for UBER in Leicester? I would say yes unless his home council requires him to work within his licensing area predominantly. An increasing number of councils now require that confirmation when re-licensing. He could also be viewed as plying for hire in any area that he isn't licensed in. I would also caution hackney drivers, doing as you say above, over what they charge. They must have an agreement with the person who books if the fare exceeds the home tariff. I'm not sure a Uber booking can be classed as an agreement, given Uber is the principal and sets the fare, not the driver, as stated in the acts. I'm also surprised Uber is inviting hackneys to their app, given the issues with pricing. |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Sun Sep 21, 2025 7:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: working for UBER |
yes but. uber rates apply not meter |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Tue Feb 03, 2026 3:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: working for UBER |
a hack can work anywhere as a PH as i understood it the caveat is the "intended useage" clause |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Tue Feb 03, 2026 8:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: working for UBER |
wannabeeahack wrote: a hack can work anywhere as a PH as i understood it the caveat is the "intended useage" clause And the set metered rate rule. |
|
| Author: | heathcote [ Wed Feb 04, 2026 1:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: working for UBER |
A hack is a hack 24/7 and is always a hack can never be a private hire vehicle |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Thu Feb 12, 2026 5:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: working for UBER |
Sussex wrote: wannabeeahack wrote: a hack can work anywhere as a PH as i understood it the caveat is the "intended useage" clause And the set metered rate rule. only within its own licensed area or sections of |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Thu Feb 12, 2026 5:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: working for UBER |
heathcote wrote: A hack is a hack 24/7 and is always a hack can never be a private hire vehicle But can WORK as a PHV via any PH base in England or wales unless, as stated, its LA has the "intended useage" caveat in its policy |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|