Anonymous wrote:
Some councils dont give a stuff.
But wasnt this the council that banned someone for using a mobile?
But wasnt this the council that banned someone for using a mobile?
Yep
| Taxi Driver Online http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| Would you give this man a badge? http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=754 |
Page 1 of 6 |
| Author: | Nidge2 [ Sat Jul 10, 2004 9:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Would you give this man a badge? |
From a previous thread regarding a driver who has been licensed by Mansfield Council here is his CRB disclosure. Position applied for Taxi Driver Name of Employer Mansfield District Council. Conviction details October 1993. Theft from Dwelling, Theft act 1968 S1 Fraudulently using vehicle excise licence, vehicle excise act 1971 S.26 Handling stolen goods, theft act 1968 S.22 Making of without paying, theft act 1978 S.3 Theft shoplifting, theft act 1968 S.1 Theft shoplifting, theft act 1968 S.1 Obtaining property by deception, theft act 1968 S 15 Theft of vehicle, theft act 1968 S.1 Obtaining property by deception, theft act 1968 S.15 Burglary and theft from a dwelling, theft act 1968 S.9 Fraudulently using a vehicle excise licence, vehicles excise act 1971 S.25 Handling Stolen goods, theft act 1968 S.22 Making off without payment, theft act 1978 S.3 Attempted theft, theft act 1968 S.1 Going equipped for burglary, theft act 1968 S.1 No insurance, road traffic act 1988 S.143 Handling stolen goods, theft act 1968 S.22 Obtaining property by deception, theft act 1968 S.15 Failing to surrender to bail, Bail act 19786 S.6 Attempt/ obtaining property by deception, theft act 1968 S.15 Gross indecency with child (boy) indecency with children act 1960 S.1 (1) Gross indecency with child (boy) indecency with children act 1960 S.1 (2) Gross indecency with child (girl) indecency with children act 1960 S.1 (3) Would you give this man a badge? Nigel Marchant |
|
| Author: | Guest [ Sat Jul 10, 2004 11:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yes,I would give him two. One for each lapel. Left lapel H.M.P. Right lapel PARKHURST. Back of jacket,Not to be let out,until Dead. This is an absolute shambles on behalf of the council,and more so the Police who did not stop this man getting his badge. Fit and proper person,my ar-e. yours in the trade, Hangemhigh. |
|
| Author: | Guest [ Sat Jul 10, 2004 6:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Some councils dont give a stuff. I think whatever firm the bloke works for should be named and shamed locally. If he works the ranks only. Then his plate number should be made available so people can bypass him. But wasnt this the council that banned someone for using a mobile? |
|
| Author: | Nidge2 [ Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Anonymous wrote: Some councils dont give a stuff.
But wasnt this the council that banned someone for using a mobile? Yep
|
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Sun Jul 11, 2004 4:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hasn't someone asked why they think that a lad driving with a phone in his hand, is worse than a dirty pervert. 
|
|
| Author: | Nidge2 [ Sun Jul 11, 2004 5:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sussex wrote: Hasn't someone asked why they think that a lad driving with a phone in his hand, is worse than a dirty pervert.
Yep |
|
| Author: | cab controller [ Mon Jul 12, 2004 10:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i would not give this man a licence at all |
|
| Author: | Guest [ Thu Jul 15, 2004 5:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Would you give this man a badge? |
Nidge wrote: From a previous thread regarding a driver who has been licensed by Mansfield Council here is his CRB disclosure.
Position applied for Taxi Driver Name of Employer Mansfield District Council. Conviction details October 1993. Theft from Dwelling, Theft act 1968 S1 Fraudulently using vehicle excise licence, vehicle excise act 1971 S.26 Handling stolen goods, theft act 1968 S.22 Making of without paying, theft act 1978 S.3 Theft shoplifting, theft act 1968 S.1 Theft shoplifting, theft act 1968 S.1 Obtaining property by deception, theft act 1968 S 15 Theft of vehicle, theft act 1968 S.1 Obtaining property by deception, theft act 1968 S.15 Burglary and theft from a dwelling, theft act 1968 S.9 Fraudulently using a vehicle excise licence, vehicles excise act 1971 S.25 Handling Stolen goods, theft act 1968 S.22 Making off without payment, theft act 1978 S.3 Attempted theft, theft act 1968 S.1 Going equipped for burglary, theft act 1968 S.1 No insurance, road traffic act 1988 S.143 Handling stolen goods, theft act 1968 S.22 Obtaining property by deception, theft act 1968 S.15 Failing to surrender to bail, Bail act 19786 S.6 Attempt/ obtaining property by deception, theft act 1968 S.15 Gross indecency with child (boy) indecency with children act 1960 S.1 (1) Gross indecency with child (boy) indecency with children act 1960 S.1 (2) Gross indecency with child (girl) indecency with children act 1960 S.1 (3) Would you give this man a badge? Nigel Marchant no convictions for over 20 years, he has a right to be considered. |
|
| Author: | Guest [ Thu Jul 15, 2004 6:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
That is a valid point, but I wonder if he disclosed all those incidents to the council prior to having to do it via an enhanced CRB. If he hadn't then he is also a liar, if he had, then this problem should have been sorted years ago. |
|
| Author: | Nidge2 [ Fri Jul 16, 2004 1:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Would you give this man a badge? |
Anonymous wrote: no convictions for over 20 years, he has a right to be considered.
Wrong, his last conviction was 6 years ago. |
|
| Author: | Gateshead Angel [ Fri Jul 16, 2004 3:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Anonymous wrote: That is a valid point
No it is not a valid point, the man shouldn't even have the right to walk the streets. Maybe when this pervert attacks his next victim you would like to go and visit their family and explain to them why you think this peice of [edited by admin] deserved to be part of a trusted profession. No wonder you post without giving your name, by allowing people like this to "blend in" with normal society the public are at risk, and you would be as guilty as them for allowing it. Mr Guest you are a disgrace. B. L .......... on the other hand don't |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Fri Jul 16, 2004 4:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
But if you took that to the logical conclusion then the Birmingham Six, the Guildford Four and the other hundreds that have been locked up wrongly, should still be inside. On this occasion you might be right, and the council shouldn't license him. But if they gave him a license and he hasn't transgressed since, then the council have little option but to re-issue. Whether we like it or not. |
|
| Author: | Nidge2 [ Fri Jul 16, 2004 5:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Andy do you think this man has transgressed? I don't think he has, 3 charges of gross indecency against children, once a pervert always a pervert. |
|
| Author: | Nidge2 [ Fri Jul 16, 2004 5:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Anonymous wrote: That is a valid point, but I wonder if he disclosed all those incidents to the council prior to having to do it via an enhanced CRB.
If he hadn't then he is also a liar, if he had, then this problem should have been sorted years ago. I'll send him up your way for a job then hey? |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Fri Jul 16, 2004 5:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Nidge wrote: Andy do you think this man has transgressed? I don't think he has, 3 charges of gross indecency against children, once a pervert always a pervert.
My point was, if he has transgressed since being licensed then the council could easily get rid of his license, if they so wish. But if he hasn't, then the council are in an awkard position. At some time they must have deemed him 'fit and proper'. Now if he hasn't done anything wrong since then, then how can the council suddenly decide he is not 'fit and proper'? |
|
| Page 1 of 6 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|